1923’s Shocking Finale: Fans Outraged by Dark Ending and Controversial Themes!

by

1923’s conclusion stirred up much debate, extending the somber and foreboding undertones from its second season. This series is a prequel spinoff of Taylor Sheridan’s Yellowstone, starring Kevin Costner as John Dutton III who seeks to safeguard his children and the Yellowstone Dutton Ranch. In 1923, we delve into the lives of John’s ancestors during the Prohibition Era, with Harrison Ford and Helen Mirren portraying Jacob and Cara Dutton respectively. The prequel effectively conveys the gritty atmosphere of early-twentieth-century American life.

1923 serves as a continuation to 1883, the initial prequel that traced the Dutton family lineage with Tim McGraw and Faith Hill portraying James and Margaret Dutton. Their journey across the Oregon Trail is depicted in the earlier installment, and 1923 unfolds 40 years later, providing insights into subsequent events. Originally planned as a single season set in the 1920s, the tale spans two seasons or 15 episodes, according to Taylor Sheridan’s description. However, the second half of the story, often referred to as 1923 season 2, carried a more somber tone than the first, leaving some viewers feeling somewhat dissatisfied.

1923’s Final Episode Concluded The Show On A Dark Note

Alex Death Doubled Down On 1923’s Dark Themes

1923’s season 1 opens the story with a mix of tension and tranquility. With war looming over the Dutton family and their Montana ranch, viewers follow Jacob and Cara’s efforts to shield future generations, such as Jack (Darren Mann) and Elizabeth Dutton (Michelle Randolph). At the same time, we discover Spencer Dutton (Brandon Sklenar), a war hero and big-game hunter for Kenya’s Protectorate in Africa. In this season, Spencer encounters and falls in love with Alex Dutton (Julia Schlaepfer). Unfortunately, 1923 delivers one of Yellowstone’s most heart-wrenching conclusions to the story of Alex and Spencer.

In the second season of “1923“, Spencer and Alex embark on individual treks to Montana following their separation at the end of season 1. Their paths across America, marked by a war hero and a British immigrant, are fraught with hardships, showcasing the grim realities of the corruption and moral decay prevalent during that era. Unfortunately, Alex Dutton experiences a harrowing journey filled with violence and mistreatment, making it particularly distressing when Spencer’s wife succumbs to hypothermia. Consequently, despite their reunion in the winter of 1924 and beyond, the series concluded on a somber note with Alex’s demise, casting a dark shadow over “1923“.

As a movie critic, I must admit that I’ve found myself in agreement with many viewers who felt somewhat disappointed by the conclusion of “1923”. The digital realm, particularly platforms like Reddit, has become a hub for such discussions. On a recent post from “the-beysh-of-whit”, where a user expressed their dismay over the way the love story between Spencer and Alex was wrapped up, user LichQueenBarbie chimed in with their thoughts:

“I too share the same sentiments of being upset with how they ended the beautiful love story between Spencer and Alex.

This show features an excessive amount of unnecessary writing, coming across as dull, jaded content that seems to serve only cynicism, lacking depth and subtlety.

Bring back hopeful endings. Real life is hateful enough.

In a comment on another post, Reddit user Singer211 expressed dissatisfaction with Alex and Spencer’s conclusion in the series, stating, “It felt forced or unnatural.” The perceived shortcomings of the final episode served to reinforce the criticisms already leveled against the second season of the show, 1923.

1923 Was Already Facing Criticism Due To Other Problems

Abuse Was A Core Theme Of 1923

In the second season of 1923, which premiered in 1923, viewers are immediately confronted with a barrage of abusive behavior from characters such as Donald Whitfield (played by Timothy Dalton). This early onslaught leaves audiences questioning Whitfield’s involvement in the prequel. In the opening episode of 1923 season 2, we find Whitfield living with two sex workers, Lindy (Madison Elise Rogers) and Christy (Cailyn Rice). These scenes sparked immediate controversy as Whitfield and Lindy’s treatment of Christy becomes increasingly cruel, with Lindy binding Christy in a closet for torment.

As a dedicated film enthusiast, I found myself engaged in discussions about the necessity of the violence portrayed in the prequel, 1923. While stars like Rogers defended it as a realistic aspect, others, including me, felt it veered towards sensationalism, bordering on voyeuristic indulgence. The rest of the season failed to substantiate these claims, leaving many viewers questioning the extended screen time devoted to such events with minimal reward.

Alex Dutton’s journey was not spared the horrors of the era, including a harrowing sexual assault aboard a train bound for Chicago. These harrowing experiences served to underscore the harsh realities of the period, but it remains unclear why 1923 chose to devote so much screen time to such events with little apparent payoff.

How 1923’s Series Finale Compared To Yellowstone’s Ending

Yellowstone’s Ending Was More Hopeful

The finale of the series Yellowstone, airing just months before the conclusion of 1923, offered a significantly more optimistic tone compared to the Yellowstone saga set in the 1920s. In the fifteenth episode of Yellowstone’s fifth season, Luke Grimes’ character Kayce Dutton transfers ownership of the Yellowstone Ranch to the Broken Rock Tribe, honoring a commitment made by the family to the land’s original stewards as far back as 1883. Although John Dutton’s demise undoubtedly added a somber tone to the series finale, the joyous resolution for Kayce and Beth (played by Kelly Reilly), liberated from the perilous duty of safeguarding their family’s heritage, served as a healing conclusion to the original show.

Although it was anticipated due to Taylor Sheridan’s predictions for the end of Yellowstone in 1883, the finale still provided the events fitting for the show. However, both Yellowstone and 1923 received similar criticism regarding their finales. The issues were that neither series delivered what they had suggested in their trailers, which promoted the range war between the 1920s Duttons and Beth’s struggle against Jamie (Wes Bentley) as crucial elements of the storyline. In essence, both Yellowstone and 1923 fell short of meeting the expectations set by their trailers.

What The 1923 Finale Got Right

Banner’s War Against The Family

1923’s finale primarily focused on Spencer and Alex’s reunion and Alex’s demise; however, it got several aspects right. The gunfights at the train station and the ranch, though brief, were superbly choreographed and captivating. During the commotion, Cara Dutton’s bravery in defending the family lodge from the attic with Jacob’s elk rifle stood out, as she demonstrated sharp shooting skills that further strengthened Helen Mirren’s powerful and rebellious character. Harrison Ford’s performance was noteworthy too, intervening at the train station to stop Banner, advocating for Alex at the hospital, and transferring the ranch to Spencer.

Surprisingly, the most fully developed and rewarding ending in the series “1923” might well be that of Banner Creighton (played by Jerome Flynn). Banner’s narrative was rich and impactful, tracing the moral evolution of a Scottish shepherd who waged war against the Dutton family. Though he was initially portrayed as the main adversary, Banner’s death held a bittersweet tone, as he had recently demonstrated redemption, championing Jacob and their shared lifestyle in the end, prioritizing their family and values above all else. While Whitfield’s antagonism contributed to the resolution of Banner’s storyline, it’s worth noting that the graphic violence depicted in “1923” can be challenging to overlook, especially when compared to storylines that don’t deliver a similar payoff.

Read More

2025-05-26 04:01