Among the superhero movies in the past decade, very few have been as criticized by fans as “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice”. Intended to help the DC Extended Universe compete with the Marvel Cinematic Universe, this overloaded sequel to “Man of Steel” attempted to accomplish too much at once and nearly sunk the Snyderverse before it even started. Although a longer, clearer director’s cut was released later, which somewhat salvaged the film, most DC enthusiasts believe that “Batman v Superman” represented a cinematic nadir for its two principal characters. Moreover, one of the movie’s major flaws was that it was often hard to follow and make sense.
In fairness, some of the puzzling aspects of the film “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice” were addressed in the “Ultimate Edition”. For example, spectators initially couldn’t understand how Lex Luthor could falsely accuse Superman for shooting a group of innocents in Africa. The “Ultimate Edition” revealed that one of Lex’s henchmen used a flamethrower to char the bodies, mimicking Superman’s heat vision. Regrettably, despite the additional 30 minutes added to the director’s cut of “BVS”, there are still many aspects of the movie that remain inexplicable. Even nearly a decade after its release, these three points continue to perplex viewers.
Why Don’t Batman and Superman Explain Themselves?
In the film “Batman v Superman”, a significant number of plot points revolve around the main characters failing to communicate effectively. The movie portrays Batman’s dislike for Superman as stemming from the damage he causes and his potential to become evil and rule over Earth. On the other hand, Superman harbors hostility towards Batman due to his belief that Batman’s methods are excessively violent, which is ironic given Superman’s own history of lethal actions. For instance, in “Man of Steel”, Superman snapped Zod’s neck and likely killed the warlord holding Lois captive in “Batman v Superman”. It’s possible that he could have restrained the man without resorting to violence, but it seems unlikely.
Despite their differences, one might expect that the initial move toward resolving their disputes would be a conversation. Batman gets a prime opportunity for this when Superman halts the Batmobile during a high-speed chase and removes its roof. All Bruce needed to initiate a discussion was to casually inquire of Clark, “What’s your issue with me?” However, he elects to ask the Steel Man an unusual question, “Do you bleed?” Given Batman’s exceptional intellect and investigative skills, this seems like an unwise query. After all, if Superman’s other physical attributes resemble ours, wouldn’t it be logical to assume that he has some sort of fluid coursing through his extraterrestrial veins?
Later on, when the two protagonists encounter each other for their major battle, it falls upon Superman to initiate a dialogue first. A straightforward “Hold on! Your plan is to kill my mother,” could have prevented an excess of visually impressive but ultimately unnecessary fighting. Most crucially, it would have saved the world from the infamous “Martha” moment.
Why Doesn’t Wonder Woman Use the Kryptonite Spear on Doomsday?
It’s well-known that Superman meets his end in the movie “Batman v Superman,” but despite this, his death could have been prevented. For those unaware of the film’s finale, Superman picks up a Kryptonite spear crafted by Batman and stabs Doomsday with it, both the monster and he perishing as a result. One might wonder why he did this when he could have simply thrown the spear at Doomsday, which is how such weapons are typically utilized. More crucially, though, why did he approach the spear – a weapon made of his one fatal weakness – in the first place?
It boils down to the fact that they’re not talking enough. Even amidst their intense battle, it wouldn’t take long for Superman to call out to Wonder Woman, “Hey, that green stone could harm me. Could you use it to pierce Doomsday instead?” Interestingly, Kryptonite doesn’t affect Amazonians and she has the strength to endure as much damage from Doomsday as Superman can. Leaving Diana without delivering the decisive blow to the film’s main antagonist seems like a case of sloppy writing.
Why is it Batman v Superman and not Batman vs Superman?
Zack Snyder’s decision to use a single lowercase “v” rather than the usual “vs” in the movie title “Batman v Superman” drew criticism from fans before it was even released. To them, the title resembled a court case like Smith vs Johnson, which is not what they were anticipating for a battle between two iconic superheroes. Instead of excitement for an epic showdown between these heavyweights, fans were left imagining a Law and Order episode.
Zack Snyder explained to USA Today before the film’s premiere that employing “v” instead of “vs” was intended to steer clear from a conventional “versus” movie, even in the slightest manner. Interestingly, the final product turned out to be precisely a “versus movie,” which leaves Snyder’s decision to title it Batman v Superman puzzling, despite the fact that BVS is more visually appealing and streamlined as an abbreviation compared to BVSS.
If you’re curious about the confusing parts of “Batman v Superman”, you can now stream it on Max.
Read More
- Solo Leveling Season 3: What You NEED to Know!
- Owen Cooper Lands Major Role in Wuthering Heights – What’s Next for the Young Star?
- AUCTION PREDICTION. AUCTION cryptocurrency
- `Tokyo Revengers Season 4 Release Date Speculation`
- How to Install & Use All New Mods in Schedule 1
- ETH PREDICTION. ETH cryptocurrency
- Solo Leveling Arise Amamiya Mirei Guide
- Shocking Truth Revealed: Is Cassandra Really Dead in Netflix’s Terrifying Mini-Series?
- `Kylie Kelce Spills the Tea on Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift’s Relationship`
- Jimmy Carr Reveals Hilarious Truth About Comedians’ Secret Competition on Last One Laughing!
2025-03-22 22:11