U.S. behind in stablecoin regulation? Former CFTC execs weigh in

  • Stablecoin adoption grows, but complex US regulations hinder progress.
  • Tether’s influence raises concerns about US regulatory and taxation disparity.

As an analyst with a background in financial regulation and experience working in the crypto industry, I believe that while stablecoins offer significant opportunities for the US economy, their growth is being hindered by complex regulations.


There’s been a significant shift in attitudes towards cryptocurrencies in the US economy. This change was initiated with the green light given to Bitcoin [BTC] and later Ethereum [ETH] exchange-traded funds (ETFs). More recently, the crypto sector has gained even greater prominence due to its impact on the presidential election.

As an analyst, I’ve observed a noticeable shift in the US regulatory stance towards the cryptocurrency industry. With each new development, it becomes increasingly clear that the US approach is softening. However, this raises an intriguing question: what impact will these evolving regulations have on stablecoins?

In a recent episode of the “Unchained” podcast, Daniel Gorfine, who previously held the position of Chief Innovation Officer at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in the United States, highlighted the significant potential for the US to enhance its financial influence through stablecoins that are supported by the US government.

Nevertheless, he pointed out that the United States has yet to establish comprehensive federal rules for stablecoins.

“Numerous countries around the world are currently implementing regulations on stablecoins, including dollar-pegged ones, before the United States takes any action at a federal level.”

Furthermore, despite the challenges posed by cryptocurrencies to the financial system, Gorfine emphasized that Bitcoin was instrumental in sparking debates about innovative financial structures such as stablecoins and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

The need for stablecoins

As a crypto investor, I’ve learned that the unpredictability of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin can be challenging. However, I’ve found solace in investing in stablecoins. These digital assets maintain their value since they are linked to traditional currencies such as the US dollar. Therefore, when market volatility strikes, I can count on my stablecoin holdings to remain relatively steady.

It’s clear that the use of these coins is on the rise, as major companies like Stripe and PayPal now support popular stablecoins like USDC for standard transactions.

Adding to the fray, Former CFTC chairman Chris Giancarlo in the same conversation noted, 

“Stablecoins present a potential solution to the worldwide need for accessing the value of the US dollar.”

Stablecoin discourses underscore their potential to disrupt conventional payment systems and preserve the US dollar’s dominance on the global stage.

As a crypto investor, I’ve been excited about the potential growth of stablecoins. But let’s not forget that the US regulatory landscape is intricate and poses challenges in this regard. These hurdles can impact the expansion plans for stablecoins significantly.

US’s regulatory framework in question

As a crypto investor, I believe Gorfine’s proposal of implementing a dual banking system is an effective solution. This model incorporates regulations from both the state and federal levels. By doing so, we can ensure a robust and comprehensive framework for overseeing our investments in this dynamic market.

As a crypto investor, I believe simplifying the oversight of stablecoin issuers isn’t as challenging as we might think. We can achieve clear and consistent regulation in this area with careful planning and collaboration among industry experts and regulatory bodies.

Although countries such as Singapore effectively regulate the issuance of USD-backed stablecoins, the US faces challenges in creating a unified regulatory structure for managing its own fiat currency.

Read More

2024-06-05 14:15