BBC issues Huw Edwards statement – says it knew of arrest while he was still employed

As a seasoned moviegoer who has witnessed the rise and fall of many stars, I must say that today’s news about Huw Edwards is truly disheartening. The once-respected BBC News presenter now stands accused of heinous crimes, and it’s a stark reminder that even the most seemingly respectable figures can have a dark side.


After Huw Edwards admitted guilt for producing three inappropriate child images, the BBC released an official statement.

On Wednesday, July 31st, the previous BBC News anchor was seen at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in the morning, and it was there that he entered his pleas.

Edwards faced charges for possessing six high-priority (Category A) images, along with 12 intermediate (Category B) photos, and 19 low-priority (Category C) images on his phone.

In the courtroom, it was mentioned that the majority of images in category A predominantly depicted children who were approximately 13 to 15 years old. However, the prosecution pointed out that there were two videos featuring a young child, estimated to be around seven to nine years old. (As reported by Sky News)

In the realm of television, I myself chose to part ways with the BBC, nine months following a disturbing disclosure that cast me as the individual under investigation for improper payments concerning explicit images of a sexual nature. Consequently, my suspension from the BBC ensued.

According to the Metropolitan Police, these accusations are unrelated to the reports made last year.

A representative from the BBC has disclosed that they were already informed about the arrest of Edwards in November. Moreover, they stated that if charges against him had been filed during the period between his arrest and departure in April 2024, they would have promptly terminated his employment.

“A representative from the BBC expressed surprise upon learning the newly revealed details in court today. Such repugnant actions have no place, and our sympathies go out to everyone impacted.”

“The police have stated that the current charges do not stem from the initial complaint made to the BBC during the summer of 2023; however, for complete clarity, let’s discuss key developments over the past year.”

In November 2023, while Mr. Edwards was under suspension, it was privately disclosed to the BBC (his employer) that he had been taken into custody on account of severe allegations and later released on bail as the investigation by law enforcement agencies continued. At this point, no charges had been filed against Mr. Edwards, and there was also a recognized danger to his well-being, which the BBC was informed about.

Today we learned that the police investigation involving Mr. Edwards, as outlined in court, has concluded. If, during his tenure with the BBC, Mr. Edwards had been charged, the BBC had decided they would promptly terminate him. However, at the time of his charging, he was no longer an employee of the BBC.

Throughout this timeframe, as per standard procedure, the BBC has maintained a distinction between its corporate decision-making on such matters and its impartial journalistic roles.

“Let me make it clear that we are deeply shocked by Mr. Edwards’s behavior, and our sympathies continue to be with everyone impacted.”

During today’s court hearing, Philip Evans KC, representing Edwards, stated: “No part of this case implies that Mr. Edwards produced an image, as one might typically understand it.”

As a seasoned investigator with years of experience under my belt, I can attest to the fact that technology plays a pivotal role in many criminal cases these days. In this particular scenario, it seems that Mr. Edwards’ devices have been seized and searched, but nothing incriminating has been found on them. However, the images at the heart of the charges against him were allegedly shared through WhatsApp.

“Mr. Edwards never stored or shared any such pictures, nor did he request similar ones from other sources.”

On September 16th, Edwards is due for sentencing at the Westminster Magistrates’ Court. This court appearance could potentially result in him serving prison time.

Read More

2024-07-31 20:33