‘Jurassic World Rebirth’ Has ‘Spirit of the First Movie’

The author of Jurassic Park, David Koepp, hinted that Jurassic World: Rebirth will capture the essence or feeling of the original film.

The writer who crafted “Jurassic Park” (1993) and its sequel “The Lost World: Jurassic Park” (1997), in collaboration with director Steven Spielberg, is set to revisit the franchise for its upcoming film, suggesting that “Rebirth” will pay tribute to the original while introducing a fresh, new mood to the series.

During an interview with TheWrap, Koepp expressed their intention to embody the essence of the initial film, aiming for a similar mood and atmosphere they find most fitting.

Keeop found the concept of a new beginning that inspired him to take up writing again for the work titled Rebirth once more.

He mentioned that opportunities like the one he’s referring to, with minimal instructions other than including dinosaurs, aren’t common.

As a passionate movie buff, I must confess that prior to his agreement to rejoin the Jurassic universe, Koepp had a set of conditions he presented to Universal Studios that needed to be addressed.

As a dedicated movie enthusiast, let me share my thoughts on this cinematic masterpiece:

1. First and foremost, the continuity of the events in the first six films is non-negotiable – I can’t stand retconning.
2. Secondly, any scientific elements portrayed should be grounded in reality.
3. Last but not least, a good dose of humor is essential for a breathable viewing experience.

Speaking about rejoining the franchise, Koepp found it “strange and disorienting” to return to a time 30 years ago for the movie Rebirth.

He added: “It even smelled the same.”

“It felt low pressure, even though Universal might be horrified to hear that.”

Reflecting on the films Jurassic Park and The Lost World, Koepp expressed that crafting these initial movies ranked among his most enjoyable professional moments yet.

He commented: “Blending thrilling adventures with authentic science perfectly suits my interests. Additionally, the opportunity to establish a fresh approach every few films, by altering the tone and characters within a series, feels appropriate after about three movies.

Working exclusively with Steven was enjoyable, as we were able to collaborate on creating a unique story, introducing fresh characters, and experimenting with a distinct narrative style.

In the film titled “Jurassic World: Renaissance,” featuring Scarlett Johansson, Jonathan Bailey, and Mahershala Ali, the story unfolds five years post-2022’s “Dominion.” The plot revolves around a group of researchers in a rush to collect DNA samples from three dinosaurs. Their aim is to discover a remarkable medical advancement.

Earlier on, the director of the movie “Rebirth”, Gareth Edwards, expressed his aspirations that his upcoming 2025 project would initiate a fresh trilogy.

The Worst Movies of 2024

12. Argylle

In the same vein as Matthew Vaughn, director of Argylle, I’m a fan of spy movies from the ’60s and ’70s, including those with a touch of kitsch or cheesiness. I don’t demand that every action-thriller be serious; in fact, I appreciate it when they aren’t, given how many do nowadays. Argylle, for me, represents a refreshing change with its unique character and over-the-top action sequences.

However, unlike the classic movies I adore, Argylle seems to lack several elements that make those films so captivating. The stunning locations, jaw-dropping practical stunts, genuine sexual tension, and authenticity are absent here. Instead, we find a talented cast caught in an intricate, confusing narrative that seems to borrow heavily from superior movies. Additionally, there’s an excessive use of green screen shots, which is disappointing. To top it all off, the post-credits scene was one of the most perplexing I have ever encountered in my cinematic journey.

11. The Crow

You might assume that remakes given extensive time in development would produce the finest results. The revival of the ’90s goth symbol, initially announced back in 2008, is a prime example. With fifteen years at their disposal, one would think they could have perfected a new Crow movie, wouldn’t they? Yet… Despite the intrigue of incorporating a vast amount of opera into this remake of the ultimate Hot Topic property and the action in the 2024 version of The Crow being quite intense, the build-up to that point was an arduous journey. Bill Skarsgard, who made an unforgettable impact this year as the new Nosferatu, fell short in his portrayal of the new Crow, a character returning from the dead after an untimely demise to seek vengeance for his lost love while brooding shirtlessly. My personal opinion is that this Crow remake is not significantly inferior to the original, although it’s also not as good as the original.

10. Lift

At this point, people like to make easy jokes about how bad Netflix movies feel like they were extruded from some data port by a malfunctioning AI, but Kevin Hart’s downmarket Ocean’s 11 knockoff Lift really seemed like it was assembled from a checklist of things all Netflix blockbusters must possess, including…

A generic title of no more than three words.
Bland digital photography without style or panache.
Big-name stars who are not too big to take a low-effort, high-salary paycheck.
A plot that involves a bunch of international locations in countries where Netflix sells subscriptions.
At least one sequence where they clearly never went to said international location and shot the entire thing on an obvious green screen instead.

9. IF

In today’s cinema landscape, it’s quite uncommon to come across movies like John Krasinski’s “IF” that are seldom produced these days. The primary motivation of Hollywood seems to be preserving and expanding the worth of intellectual property rather than creating art. Many blockbusters undergo rigorous focus-grouping and testing, stripping them of any unique character or charm they might have had. They are carefully designed to appeal to the largest potential audience.

Conversely, “IF” is a film that lacks a clear target demographic. The story revolves around a girl who loses her mother and discovers she can communicate with imaginary friends of other children. This narrative is too leisurely and somber for children and too sentimental and cloying for adults. While it urges audiences to enjoy themselves, it fails to deliver any fun experiences itself. (Even the “IF” IHOP menu wasn’t particularly appealing.)

8. Trigger Warning

In the movie “Trigger Warning” (wink wink), Jessica Alba stars as a top CIA agent who goes back to her small town, only to uncover a plot involving a lucrative mine and a corrupt senator. With Redbox gone, it seems these mediocre thrillers have found their new home on the “Since You Liked Rebel Ridge” section of Netflix. (Important note: Even if you enjoyed Rebel Ridge, I strongly advise against watching this.)

7. Kraven the Hunter

As a film enthusiast, have you ever pondered the origins of Kraven’s furry vest? If so, let me introduce you to the movie that might just satisfy your curiosity – “Kraven”. Unfortunately, if you’re not particularly intrigued by Kraven’s wardrobe, this lengthy and meandering Spider-Man spinoff (absent of Spider-Man) might not offer much. The film focuses on a hunter of men, portrayed by Aaron Taylor-Johnson, whose notable features are his physique. His battles include a struggle with his father (Russell Crowe, delivering a flamboyant and heavily Russian-accented performance), and the Rhino, who in this universe is a bumbling Russian criminal, always seen carrying a child-sized backpack filled with medicine to prevent him from transforming into a large, gray-skinned monster. It’s rumored that “Kraven” was the breaking point for Sony’s Spider-Man spinoff universe regarding the Rhino. For that, I will forever be thankful to it. Yet, it still left much to be desired in terms of quality.

6. Rebel Moon — Part Two: The Scargiver

The initial part of Zack Snyder’s reimagined Star Wars, released towards the end of 2023, was enjoyable due to its team-building narrative set across various strange sci-fi worlds filled with unique aliens and devices. However, the second half, titled “Rebel Moon – Part Two: The Scargiver,” turned out to be a lengthy battle scene, made even more tedious by Snyder’s excessive slow-motion shots. It was essentially a nap-inducer; I had to watch it three times because the artistic violence kept making me sleepy. At least the Scargiver leaves quite an impression with its scars. I assume that the director’s cut – “Rebel Moon – Chapter Two: Curse of Forgiveness” – is superior. (I must admit, I haven’t attempted to watch it yet.)

5. Night Swim

In a nutshell, I believe that any subject can be used to make an excellent film, as long as it’s executed well. However, the execution in “Night Swim” could have been better, and I question whether it truly instills fear when its horror story revolves around a family’s haunted swimming pool. Despite various unsettling events like almost drowning, injuries while cleaning the pool, the disappearance of their cat near the pool, and ghostly arms emerging from filters, wouldn’t you eventually decide to stop using the pool? Frankly, “Night Swim” fails to frighten me; I face daily challenges similar to having two kids without a pool in bustling New York City during August. In contrast, the lack of a creative title like “Pooltergeist” adds to my disappointment. It’s perplexing; they didn’t even attempt to create a more appealing concept for this film.

4. Red One

In simpler terms, the user is questioning the target audience and creative decisions behind the movie “Red One.” Specifically, they find it odd that a Christmas film would contain profanity, scary monsters, and sexually suggestive content. They also express concern about the high production cost and quality of the film.

The user is puzzled about who the intended audience for “Red One” is, as the movie seems to combine Christmas themes with inappropriate content such as swearing, frightening creatures, and explicit imagery. They are also confused by its high production cost and poor quality.

3. Borderlands

> In a potential future book chronicling Cate Blanchett’s illustrious career, her transition from scoring the ‘Monster Hunter’ soundtrack, a move seemingly driven by financial necessity for some, to starring in this seemingly soulless video game adaptation, will surely make an intriguing contrast. Admittedly, the film adaptation of the ‘Borderlands’ franchise is far from impressive (to say the least), but after a series of relatively respectable video game adaptations on screen and television, it was refreshing to witness such a consistently subpar production. It appears that nature may indeed be healing itself.

2. Madame Web

In a similar vein to many Marvel films prior to the Marvel Studios era, “Madame Web” appears to be somewhat self-conscious about its comic book origins. This sentiment seems to extend to Dakota Johnson, who portrays the title character, despite the fact that her character isn’t actually referred to as “Madame Web” within the movie. Instead, she is known as Cassie Webb. With only a solitary exception, she also doesn’t don a superhero costume in the film. It seems everyone involved is somewhat sheepish about their role. Given the circumstances, this isn’t entirely unexpected.

On the other hand, it’s so absurd, strange, and occasionally confusing that “The Amazing Spider-Man” looks like a model of clarity in comparison. But envision watching it alongside Kevin Feige – now that would be entertaining!

1. Megamind vs. the Doom Syndicate

In this animated sequel, I found myself questioning the financial resources of the major studio that produced it. The quality of a mockbuster from The Asylum, mimicking Megamind, wouldn’t have looked any more economical than this film. Scene after scene unfolded in the supposed bustling city of “Metro City,” but it appeared flat, dull, and completely devoid of inhabitants. With the exception of one dance party scene, there were no pedestrians or onlookers to be found anywhere. Instead, Megamind and the Doom Syndicate seemed to be battling for control over a deserted town, which resembled a less foggy version of the Nintendo 64 game “Superman.” It took them 14 years to create a sequel to Megamind, and this is what they delivered? What went wrong in the process?

2025-01-14 04:10