The Shocking Truth Behind the Belle Gibson Wellness Scandal

A star rating of 4 out of 5.

In this era where misinformation is widespread, it’s now crucial than ever to be discerning about the information you encounter online. The tale of fallen influencer Belle Gibson (portrayed by Kaitlyn Dever) carries a strange prescience in today’s context.

During the early to mid 2010s, which seems further away than just a decade suggests, Belle was gaining recognition on a relatively new social media site named Instagram.

In that setting, she mesmerized a vast crowd numbering in the hundreds of thousands by recounting her extraordinary journey battling brain cancer using diet and wellness practices. Her tale served as a source of motivation for others afflicted with the disease, encouraging them to explore alternative healing methods.

There was just one problem: Belle never had cancer.

In Apple Cider Vinegar, this intriguing tale unfolds as a feud between Belle and wellness guru Milla Blake, portrayed by Alycia Debnam-Carey, who seems reminiscent of the late Jessica Ainscough. This story is vividly depicted in the series.

It seems that the intense hostility and suspicion between them might have been slightly exaggerated for dramatic effect, yet their encounters are a factual account, as documented publicly – and the parallel nature of their narratives is chilling.

Instead of her counterpart, Ainscough genuinely struggled with cancer, and she vigorously pursued unconventional methods such as the Gerson therapy for treatment.

As a dedicated cinephile, I’ve been documenting my journey on the web under the alias Wellness Warrior. Regrettably, my tale sheds light on the heart-wrenching truth for those who completely eschew traditional medical practices.

This pair of interwoven narratives serves as the base for the captivating mini-series titled “Apple Cider Vinegar,” which skillfully portrays the bizarre nature of Gibson’s deceptions, all while not downplaying the pain and sorrow their consequences brought about.

In my opinion, a pivotal factor in achieving success lies in the exceptional performance of Kaitlyn Dever, cast as Belle. To put it gently, Belle is not easily understood, and this role presents quite the challenge for her. In the often blunt world of the internet, she has been subjected to less than flattering descriptions by many.

Apple Cider Vinegar proposes various speculations about what may have led Belle to act in such an unexpected manner, without endorsing these potential reasons as a justification for her dishonesty.

Significantly, the program does not require you to pardon her nor even empathize deeply, but it does suggest that no action happens without cause or context, implying that some trigger likely set off this astonishing series of occurrences.

Viewers are often tasked with forming their own opinions about whether the character’s behavior is driven by greed, loneliness, naivety, narcissism, childhood trauma, mental illness, a combination of these, or something else entirely – it’s possible we may never uncover the truth.

Dever effectively portrays the dual nature of Belle’s character: on one hand, she skillfully depicts the warm, elegant public image that Belle preserved for many years; on the other hand, she convincingly shows a more reserved, private demeanor towards her partner, Clive (Ashley Zukerman), in their intimate scenes.

But the show saves its sympathy for Milla and her family.

Although the character (as well as her real-life analogue) has faced valid criticisms – regardless of good intentions, she did guide some individuals towards alternative medicine instead of traditional practices – there is an emotionally resonant honesty in her struggle.

Debnam-Carey’s performance powerfully illustrates a misguided trust in the extreme fringes of the wellness community, serving as a reminder that individuals who are susceptible, distressed, and yearning for hope frequently turn to unconventional therapies.

In her supporting character as Milla’s mother, Tamara, played by Susie Porter, initially overcomes reservations and ultimately stands behind her daughter’s aspirations, embarking on a challenging journey of her own.

Unfortunately, the parallel narrative about Lucy (Tilda Cobham-Hervey), who’s married to investigative journalist Justin (Mark Coles Smith), and her cancer struggle doesn’t seem to pack as much punch.

Or:

The storyline of Lucy (Tilda Cobham-Hervey), wife of investigative journalist Justin (Mark Coles Smith), fighting cancer alongside him, doesn’t hold the same emotional weight.

Both versions convey the same idea in a natural and easy-to-read manner.

The issue isn’t with Cobham-Hervey and Smith’s acting, which is strong, but rather with the way a specific storyline seems forced or awkwardly added to the series – and unfortunately, it appears that’s precisely its purpose.

In this adaptation, the character Justin shares some similarities with real-life journalist Richard Guilliatt, who was inspired to explore the story of Belle due to his wife’s personal battle with cancer. However, it’s important to note that her diagnosis occurred in 2005, which differs slightly from the depicted timeline in this presentation.

It seems they may have made more changes than just one to her tale, as parts of it seem unrelated and quite distant from the central occurrences – almost as if these sections were added for extra content in what was previously a concise narrative.

Despite the fact that it’s centered around a topic most people strive to steer clear of – cancer – Apple Cider Vinegar will undoubtedly keep your focus throughout its six-episode duration. This is quite an accomplishment for a series on such a subject.

In this tale, while the profound sorrow at its core is always palpable, screenwriters Samantha Strauss, Anya Beyersdorf, and Angela Betzien cleverly balance it out with a sprinkle of dark humor that satirically highlights the grandiose nature of Belle’s stories.

The portrayal is usually appropriate, appearing at suitable points within the narrative, and it doesn’t focus on the experiences of real-life cancer patients. However, some people may find it challenging to approach such a serious matter in a less somber manner.

People who are uncertain might find comfort knowing that, as clarified at the start of every episode, the actual Gibson hasn’t received payment for this reenactment of her tale. This implies that the person portrayed as a convicted scammer won’t gain financially in any substantial manner from it.

2025-02-03 13:34

Read More