Why Russell Crowe’s Master and Commander Failed Despite 17 More Books Ready to Adapt

by

In 2003, Russell Crowe featured in a strategic war film that aimed to launch a new series, but despite having 17 additional books to draw from, only one movie was ever produced based on it. The film, titled “Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World“, cast Crowe as Captain Jack Aubrey and Paul Bettany as Dr. Stephen Maturin, the ship’s doctor. This film was a cherished project for Fox executive Tom Rothman, who enlisted Peter Weir (known for “The Truman Show“) to direct it.

The film “Master and Commander” narrates the journey of Aubrey’s ship as it chases a French warship across the waters of South America during the Napoleonic Wars. The production of this movie involved building replica ships at an expensive cost of $150 million. Despite being a modest box-office hit, with earnings of $212 million domestically, it didn’t generate enough revenue to warrant a sequel for “Master and Commander.” This was disheartening since “Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World” was also critically acclaimed, boasting an 85% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes and earning 10 Oscar nominations, including a nod for Best Picture.

Russell Crowe’s Master & Commander Only Adapted 3 Out Of 20 Books It’s Based On

The First Movie Was Mostly Based On The Tenth Book

Although “Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World” is a single movie, it’s important to note that it spans over two hours and surprisingly combines elements from three books in the Patrick O’Brian series. The film draws its name from the Aubrey-Maturin series, which are characters portrayed by Russell Crowe and Paul Bettany. However, this movie may have left some hardcore fans of the novel series perplexed as it did not adapt one specific book but instead was based on three novels, primarily following the plotline of the tenth book in the series titled “The Far Side of the World”.

To clarify, the film “Master and Commander” shifted the conflict from the War of 1812 to the Napoleonic Wars, effectively casting France as the antagonist instead of the United States. However, only parts of the first and 10th books were incorporated into the movie, with an additional 17 novels in the series potentially offering material for more films. The narrative of the first book commences at the dawn of the 19th century during the War of the Second Coalition, while the last book is set post-Napoleonic Wars and forms part of the struggle for Chilean independence from Spain, spanning from 1818 to 1820.

Why Master & Command 2 Never Happened (& Will It Ever?)

The Movie Didn’t Make Enough At The Box Office

As a movie reviewer looking back, I must admit that Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World left me with a sense of “one-and-done.” Despite its modest box office success and Oscar nominations, it seems unlikely we’ll see any more films based on the Aubrey-Maturin series. This isn’t to say that the movie wasn’t deserving of awards – far from it! However, it was up against a behemoth like Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, making any competition a tough battle.

The main reason for the lack of follow-ups lies in the film’s disappointing box office performance and the uncertainty of future success due to the law of diminishing returns. Simply put, the initial earnings didn’t meet expectations, and predicting continued success became a gamble that producers weren’t willing to take.

It’s been over two decades since the initial film, making it impossible for Russell Crowe and Paul Bettany to continue playing their roles. Consequently, any future film would need to start anew with a fresh take on the franchise. In 2017, Crowe hinted at potential sequel discussions, but those plans didn’t materialize. Fox initially considered a prequel to Master and Commander, but that idea also didn’t come to fruition.

The reason for the movie’s failure can be attributed to a significant shift in Hollywood during that period. While Russell Crowe had achieved immense success with Gladiator, the landscape of popular cinema in 2003 was markedly different. Major hits that year were predominantly family-oriented films such as the final Lord of the Rings movie, Spider-Man, and Pirates of the Caribbean. Master and Commander, being an adult-focused film, found itself competing against these blockbusters. Despite its counterprogramming strategy, it failed to resonate with audiences significantly. This was further exacerbated by the departure of Tom Rothman from Fox, who had been a key supporter of the franchise. Consequently, the Master and Commander series came to an end with only one movie produced.

Read More

2025-05-19 03:10