Movies based on classic monsters vary greatly in form, but the 2014 film titled “Victor Frankenstein” starring Daniel Radcliffe, Bill Nighy, and Miranda Otto, failed to offer anything fresh in the tale of Mary Shelley’s iconic character. In fact, it ranks among the lowest-rated Frankenstein films ever made. As a result, it’s perfect for revival on the free streaming platform, Tubi.
This specific adaptation of Shelley’s novel is inspired by the comic book series created by Kevin Grevioux. It serves as an imaginative continuation of the initial storyline. In essence, this summary refers to.
In a time two hundred years following Dr. Frankenstein’s creation, the creature, now named Adam (Aaron Eckhart), continues to live. He finds himself caught in a conflict between two eternal species: gargoyles, who traditionally guard humanity, and malevolent demons. Since Adam is neither human nor demon, both the gargoyle queen Leonore (Miranda Otto) and the demon prince Naberius (Bill Nighy) seek him for their own intentions. It falls upon Adam to uncover his true human nature and understand why he persists in existence.
Three years down the line, the remake of “The Mummy,” starring Tom Cruise, would nearly spell doom for classic monster movies, being widely panned due to its massive budget and poor box office performance. Compared to that, I, Frankenstein seemed like a potential Academy Award winner in my eyes.
How Bad is ‘I, Frankenstein?’
In terms of feedback on the film “I, Frankenstein“, which boasts many aspects that could make for an engaging fantasy movie with a well-known character, it’s safe to say that the reviews are far from favorable. Critics have been particularly critical, describing the movie as “boisterous, disjointed, and lacking in dramatic tension”, and they’ve labeled it as “an exceptionally uneventful fantasy adventure that fails to ignite any real enthusiasm or curiosity about its characters.
Chris Stuckmann’s critical review, labeled as a “D-“, candidly outlines the movie’s flaws. In essence, he comments that the special effects are subpar, the dialogue is cringe-worthy, and despite Aaron Eckhart’s commendable efforts, it all comes across as a low-budget TV production. On the other hand, Donald Clark of The Irish Times expressed a strong opinion about the movie, albeit not in a favorable manner. He stated that the film received an emphatic thumbs-down from him.
If another movie as bad or even worse than ‘I, Frankenstein’ emerges in 2014, it would be fitting to preserve it for display.
Despite the fact that critics heavily criticized the movie “I, Frankenstein,” with a mere 5% Tomatometer score, it sometimes receives more favorable reviews from audiences. However, its 38% Popcornmeter rating seems to suggest that the harsh criticism from critics might have been largely warranted in this instance. Some viewers felt that the visual effects were unfairly criticized, while others appreciated the action-oriented twist on the classic Frankenstein tale more than it typically received praise. Nevertheless, it’s evident that even with renewed interest on free streaming platforms over a decade after its release, “I, Frankenstein” remains a poorly crafted film overall.
Read More
- PI PREDICTION. PI cryptocurrency
- Gold Rate Forecast
- WCT PREDICTION. WCT cryptocurrency
- Guide: 18 PS5, PS4 Games You Should Buy in PS Store’s Extended Play Sale
- LPT PREDICTION. LPT cryptocurrency
- Elden Ring Nightreign Recluse guide and abilities explained
- Despite Bitcoin’s $64K surprise, some major concerns persist
- Solo Leveling Arise Tawata Kanae Guide
- ETH Mega Pump: Will Ether Soar or Sink Like a Stone? 🚀💸
- Shrek Fans Have Mixed Feelings About New Shrek 5 Character Designs (And There’s A Good Reason)
2025-05-28 02:07