Alan Moore’s Vindication: Why V for Vendetta Deserves a Do-Over

by

Over time, numerous authors have distanced themselves from movie adaptations of their work following their release, but Alan Moore was already critical of the “V for Vendetta” (2005) film before it hit theaters. In a post-release interview with The New York Times, Moore’s stance on the matter was clarified: despite studios claiming that he was eager to see his iconic graphic novel brought to life, Moore had previously made it known that he didn’t feel the same way. Moore may not be the simplest author to collaborate with, but his reservations about “V for Vendetta” as a film are understandable: while the original narrative centered around a dystopian, post-apocalyptic world reflecting real-life British Thatcherism, the movie shifted its concerns to Britain during the War on Terror.

Although the changes made to the movie version of V for Vendetta might have seemed appropriate when it was made, they make the film feel outdated now, and less intense compared to the original graphic novel. Instead of portraying how the UK falls into turmoil after a nuclear winter, as in the comic book, the movie depicts a more cartoonish scenario about what could happen if there’s an extreme response to Islamic terrorism. The film also softened the character of V; he is presented more as a compassionate rebel fighter instead of a fierce, angry terrorist.

Alan Moore Was Right about the V for Vendetta Movie

Read moreHunt: Showdown Permanently Gets Cheaper, but With a Catch

Moore’s most succinct critique might be found in an interview with MTV that is no longer available (archived). In this discussion, he expressed his concerns as follows: “The terms ‘fascism’ and ‘anarchy’ are not used anywhere in the film. It has been transformed into a narrative reminiscent of the Bush era by individuals who lack the courage to establish a political satire within their own country.

It’s accurate to say; there wasn’t a strong reason to fully transform a work addressing British fascism into a more subdued exploration of global uncertainty following 9/11 and the era of George W. Bush in America. The theme of fascism has often been significant in British literature, with George Orwell’s “1984” serving as an early example of such concerns shaping groundbreaking narratives. The original “V for Vendetta,” published between 1982 and 1985, was also part of this tradition, addressing similar issues.

At times, modifying the original content can be justifiable, but in this case, the update misses the essence of V for Vendetta. Instead of serving as a warning tale, it’s more about a thought-provoking dialogue on fascism and anarchism, which appear to be paradoxical concepts. The character of V wasn’t intended to be a hero; rather, he was designed to challenge readers, which might explain why Evey Hammond is the central character in the graphic novel (and film), and she inherits his role in the end… as portrayed in the graphic novel. In the movie, Evey is a troubled young career woman, while in the comic book, she starts as a teenage prostitute who ultimately adopts the persona of V.

The movie appears as it does due to the constraints of Hollywood during the 2000s; it transformed into a more expansive narrative with an abundance of emotional depth and fewer rigid views. Instead of depicting a chilling potential future, it alters contemporary history. Unfortunately, this film seems outdated and inappropriate, as the filmmakers seem to be expressing opinions about America through a British political lens, which doesn’t resonate logically. This dissonance was evident then, and it remains so now.

V for Vendetta Could Use Another Chance

Read moreDeadpool & Wolverine Director Reveals What Part of Making Sequel Was Most Fun

As a seasoned movie critic, I’ve come to realize that Alan Moore will likely remain an enigma in Hollywood’s eyes, but that doesn’t mean we should shy away from attempting another adaptation of his masterpiece, “V for Vendetta.” In contrast, HBO may find it simpler to rework “Watchmen” (2019), considering its American setting and the ability to seamlessly integrate modern-day American issues into the original narrative, as their TV version did.

If a new interpretation of “V for Vendetta” were to be conceived today, it would require a skilled director who is not quick to draw broad parallels between the story’s events and current global affairs. Instead, they should focus on the heart of the story: the complex political-philosophical dilemma that challenges our perception of extremism, regardless of one’s place on the political spectrum.

The small screen might be the ideal platform for a fresh interpretation of “V for Vendetta” – this format would enable a more comprehensive setup of the world at the outset, preventing the main narrative from feeling hurried. Today’s television landscape offers fertile ground for significant political debates; with extended running times compared to movies, TV shows provide ample opportunity to delve deeper into perspectives and challenge viewers’ preconceived notions. While Alan Moore may never embrace an adaptation of his work, the original “V for Vendetta” remains a relevant tale in today’s world.

Read More

2025-03-23 05:40