Batman v Superman: The Smartest Movie You're Probably Missing

Important Note: This article was initially written in 2016 as a critique and exploration of Batman v Superman’s Ultimate Edition. The content below has not been altered since its original publication.

Discussing “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice” will always be a topic of discussion. Director Zack Snyder delivered on the long-awaited screen appearance of both Batman and Superman, but in his own distinctive style – which seemed to have divided opinions. While it initially excited fans, the movie has received heavy criticism for its complex and apparently overblown narrative since its release in theaters. The home version of “Batman v Superman: The Ultimate Edition” reignited that debate once more.

In the Ultimate Edition of “Batman v Superman”, while it doesn’t completely resolve all the narrative issues with the original film, it does offer a more expansive and precise thematic journey. This transformation takes a seemingly trivial superhero confrontation and transforms it into a profound socio-political allegory that feels relevant for today, but also seems to foreshadow future events.

Here’s Why Batman v Superman Is Smarter Than You Think.

True Edition

For the sake of our conversation, let’s make sure we’re on the same page: In my opinion, it’s crucial that we focus on the Ultimate Edition of the film Batman v Superman, as I believe this is the most significant version for our discussion. While some might argue that special editions or director’s cuts don’t represent the “true” movie, and only the original theatrical release counts, my focus here isn’t about debating what constitutes a film’s canon. Instead, when assessing Batman v Superman‘s value as intelligent cinema, I feel it’s essential to consider Zack Snyder’s complete vision, rather than (as we’ll explore later) the Warner Bros. version that was edited for theater sales.

Moving forward, our conversation will revolve around Batman v Superman: The Ultimate Edition. If you haven’t watched this version of the film and find the theatrical cut so disappointing that it deters you from revisiting the movie, then we may not have much to discuss as it suggests you hold a negative opinion towards this film.

For individuals who’ve watched both adaptations, or are willing to consider an alternative perspective on their previously viewed movie, let’s dive into it together.

The American Now

One key point to grasp about “Batman v Superman” is that it’s not merely a film based on comic books. While the tale of Batman and Superman learning to respect each other despite their differing views on heroism is indeed present, it’s not the central thematic thread that dominates the movie. To fully appreciate the thematic storyline of “Batman v Superman”, it’s essential to revisit “Man of Steel” first.

In Zack Snyder’s reboot of Superman, there was just as much debate as in Batman v Superman – especially concerning the final act where Metropolis was devastated during a fight between Superman and General Zod’s Kryptonian troops. The “Battle of Metropolis” upset and enraged many viewers who thought it was out of character for Superman to allow such destruction, and in a broader sense, saw it as a cinematic reflection of post-9/11 American anxieties. It wasn’t unexpected that the controversy surrounding The Battle of Metropolis would serve as the spark for the Batman vs. Superman conflict in Batman v Superman during its development stage.

In the movie BvS, many viewers can see director Zack Snyder’s response to his critics within the storyline. However, Chris Terrio’s script, which delves into the Battle of Metropolis and its 9/11 parallels, evolves these comparisons into a comprehensive socio-political critique, using two iconic American figures as its vehicles. Essentially, it’s portraying this complex commentary on society and politics in film form.

Batman symbolizes a hardline response following 9/11, reflecting an America that prioritizes security over civil liberties. He embodies the Bush-era mindset of thwarting threats preemptively, enforcing harsh punishment on criminals, employing high-tech weaponry to mercilessly eliminate adversaries, and hailing from the wealthy elite while targeting the impoverished in Gotham. In essence, Batman is a grittier and more aggressive portrayal of America, shaped by the trauma of 9/11. He represents the bitter fruit of unchecked anger and powerlessness, much like many felt after that event. The actions inspired by these feelings can be likened to a misguided war, as Alfred puts it.

In a different take, Superman isn’t just a character in the narrative, he serves more as a symbol – a symbol that embodies progressive, liberal American ideals. Superman personifies traditional American values such as optimism, fairness, and ethics for everyone; he feels it is his duty to monitor the world and shield the vulnerable, regardless of their nationality. In his Clark Kent persona, a significant part of the movie revolves around him advocating for the civil rights of the criminal labeled by Batman – an individual whom Clark perceives as embodying the poverty and despair that underlies Gotham’s criminals, a compassion he believes Batman lacks when dealing with those he punishes so sternly. Clark is also unafraid to voice his opinions on the role of media and the ethical obligations of journalists – a departure from Clark Kent’s “clumsy nerd” persona in earlier portrayals, but a clear allegory nonetheless.

The movie clearly shows that neither Batman’s nor Superman’s principles are flawless. Batman’s anger and thirst for vengeance lead him to ignite an unwarranted conflict, which inadvertently nurtures more dangerous adversaries. Although Superman’s intentions are honorable, his excessive compassion and preoccupation with upholding moral standards in the public eye cause international unrest; this distraction prevents him from averting a devastating terrorist attack. Moreover, his fixation on judging Batman hinders both heroes from recognizing the imminent danger they both face. By the time they become alert to the threat, it has grown into a monstrous problem, and Superman’s selfless act is required to destroy it at the cost of his life.

Following the departure of a cherished ideal (Superman), both the world and his former adversary undergo change, striving to uphold the value so it doesn’t fade completely into oblivion. The striking relevance of this narrative for our current times is uncanny, and this parallel extends to the antagonist often despised in this thematic story.

Lex Luthor

In a less favorable review, it’s been noted that Jesse Eisenberg’s portrayal of Lex Luthor in “Batman v Superman” was widely criticized. However, despite appearing eccentric and odd, his character aligns precisely with the film’s thematic focus.

In simpler terms, Lex Luthor symbolizes the ruthless individuals who took advantage of the chaos and conflict following 9/11 for their own benefit. His criminal activities, though sometimes hard to follow in the storyline, are thematically linked to real-world issues that have arisen since then, such as arms trading, human trafficking, uncontrolled military expansion, political manipulation, bioweapon development, corporate misconduct, and more.

The main idea is: Lex appears to be a cunning businessman who exploits political differences for his own advantage. Considering the current state of American politics, Terrio and Snyder might as well have crystal balls and work as fortune tellers instead of being ridiculed, given how accurately they seem to predict today’s political landscape.

On a more intimate note, Lex opens up about his traumatic childhood marked by abuse from his East German father, who felt helpless due to being forced to comply with oppressive rulers. For Lex, Superman symbolizes an unsettling shift in societal and political structures, where he (as part of the elite 1%) would face a significant diminution of power and influence – a change that Lex finds unacceptable. Although some find it overly complex, there’s a striking similarity to real-life situations, as this powerful businessman orchestrates events in foreign lands, prisons, politics, and capitalizes on public anxieties.

Eisenberg’s performance might seem overly eccentric, possibly diluting some of the intellectual metaphors in his character. However, this doesn’t detract from the fact that the filmmakers have created a thought-provoking structure – one that is deeper than many viewers give credit for. In essence, Batman v Superman can be seen as an exploration of America’s post-9/11 divide, and Lex Luthor’s role in the film, while seemingly chaotic, makes thematic and character sense in the context of this narrative. Similarly, his master plan’s unraveling follows a logical progression.

The Martha Moment

Based on our chosen theme, let’s discuss the controversial ending of Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.

When Batman and Superman, representing different sides of American political thought, get into a fierce fight, it’s as if all rational discussion has vanished. Each man, being a hero in his own right, views the other as an enemy to be defeated. Batman sees Superman as an uncontrollable danger, while Superman sees Batman as a bully he needs to stand up against, as portrayed in ‘Man of Steel’. The movie ‘Batman v Superman’ aims to give depth and importance to their battle, so its outcome is crucial.

In the movie, a pivotal scene known as “The Martha Moment” has become familiar to all who’ve watched it: Batman, poised to fatally stab Superman with a Kryptonite blade, is halted upon hearing Superman exclaim, “Are you really going to let him murder Martha?” It turns out that Martha refers to Lois Lane’s mother, but the revelation of their shared maternal name – Martha Wayne being Batman’s mother’s name – triggers a memory in Batman. This emotional connection between them leads to an immediate friendship.

The idea behind “The Martha Moment” fits well within the overall story’s theme (it’s actually quite clever because many comic book fans might not have linked Martha Kent and Wayne before). However, the execution of this moment is disappointing, which weakens the intended thematic impact significantly.

The dialogue issue arises when Superman says lines like “You’re letting him kill Martha” or “Save… Martha…“. These phrases sound unnatural and forced because, in real-life situations of desperation, sons typically don’t refer to their mothers by their first names. A line such as “You’re letting him kill my mother“, which Batman could say instead, would have an equally powerful impact and thematic significance. Lois Lane could have provided the “Martha Kent” name that strengthened the emotional bond between the characters.

The essence of “The Martha Moment” lies in discovering a shared aspect between two contrasting characters (representing opposing ideologies), which is not based on their beliefs, but something deeply personal. This revelation serves as the main message or lesson that we, as viewers, should learn and apply to our real lives. However, due to its awkward execution – with dialogue that seems unnatural and Ben Affleck portraying an excessively dramatic intensity (“Why did you mention that name!“), this pivotal moment in the movie fails to resonate effectively, regardless of which version you are watching.

In my opinion, when it comes to crafting narratives and dialogues, the success often lies in the smallest details. If given another chance, I believe that the movie “Batman v Superman” could have effectively conveyed its themes more successfully.

Comic Book Roots

Let’s remember the origins of this tale: From the very beginning of the Batman v Superman production, director Zack Snyder made it clear that Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns storyline (a gritty portrayal of an older Batman returning from retirement to wage a harsher war on crime) served as a significant influence for Batman v Superman. What often goes unrecognized is the extent to which The Dark Knight Returns was a socio-political critique for its era – and how effectively Snyder carries over that theme in his film.

In the mid-80s, during the era of Reaganomics, the War on Drugs, and concerns about nuclear war, “The Dark Knight Returns” was penned. Frank Miller incorporated numerous “flashbacks” from media news segments, reflecting the rise of the 24-hour news cycle, along with personal tales shared by bystanders, to create a rich portrayal of both Batman’s character and the broader phenomenon he represents.

It’s evident that “Batman v Superman” is set in a distinct universe compared to where “The Dark Knight Returns” was conceived. However, the Ultimate Edition suggests that Snyder aimed to embody Miller’s narrative essence by including numerous references to characters, anecdotes, and broadcasts – all serving to explore the identity of Superman in today’s society. Moreover, Miller’s work was undeniably political, and Snyder signals from the start of the Ultimate Edition (through a more extensive depiction of the Lois Lane incident in Africa) that politics are integral to his movie as well (which explains the use of political allegories throughout).

In essence, “Batman v Superman” is often underestimated in terms of intelligence, but it’s also an intelligent portrayal of one of the most esteemed Batman tales.

Does BvS Deserve Another Chance?

No.

Indeed, even after extensively debating a different perspective for over two thousand words, I find myself arriving at this point. Quite unexpected, isn’t it?

In summary, I think “Batman v Superman” is more highly skilled than people typically give it credit for, particularly in terms of its complexity and ambition. However, the way these ideas were brought to life wasn’t always flawless, leading to problems such as The Martha Moment or the murky storyline of Lex Luthor. Moreover, it’s crucial to note that the cinematic version of “Batman v Superman” distorts the aforementioned depth and intricate storytelling into something hardly recognizable due to poor execution.

It appears that Warner Bros. significantly reduced or eliminated several subplots and characters in the movie, which were crucial for expressing its politically charged themes. This streamlining was done intentionally to ensure the audience experiences nothing more than a simple superhero team-up story, avoiding anything too complex or thought-provoking. For those unwilling to watch the extended cut of Batman v Superman: Ultimate Edition, this abridged version may leave a much less favorable impression compared to their experience with the full version.

For those who are still undecided (using an analogy of being on a fence), let me offer a fresh perspective that could sway your decision to enjoy (or re-enjoy) the movie “Batman v Superman” with a new layer of interpretation. This revised viewpoint is intended to enhance your viewing pleasure.

…Alternatively, feel free to reach out to me via Twitter @KofiOutlaw, inquiring about my thoughts and the reason behind writing this piece. I’m well aware of the usual response.

Man of Steel, Batman v Superman, and Zack Snyder’s Justice League are now streaming on Max.

2025-03-26 00:14

Batman v Superman: The Smartest Movie You’re Probably Missing