As a seasoned investigator with decades of experience under my belt, I must say that the Ramsey case has been one of the most intriguing and perplexing mysteries I’ve encountered. The behavior of the Ramsey family during those initial stages of the investigation struck me as peculiar, to put it mildly. It was almost as if they were playing a game of chess with us, always a step ahead or hiding something significant.
Alex Hunter, Boulder District Attorney, stated on Feb. 13, 1997: The pool of potential suspects is getting smaller and smaller. Before long, only your name will remain on the list.
JonBenét Ramsey would have turned 34 years old on Aug. 6. But she never even made it to 7.
In the afternoon of December 26, 1996, approximately eight hours after Patsy Ramsey dialed 911 in a panic, reporting the alleged kidnapping of their 6-year-old daughter, John and Patsy Ramsey’s youngest child was discovered lifeless in the basement of their Boulder, Colorado residence.
At approximately 5:30 a.m., Patsy stumbled upon a messily written, two-and-a-half-page ransom note at the base of the stairs. The note warned that her child would be harmed if her parents didn’t pay $118,000 to an unknown foreign group, who threatened to carry out the act of beheading.
In the afternoon around 1:30 PM, shortly after his second search of the house that had already gathered police and family acquaintances, it was John who found JonBenét’s body. He carefully picked up the child, who was still wearing the pajamas from the previous night, and ascended the stairs, eventually placing her next to the Christmas tree in the living room.
JonBenét had been strangled and her skull was fractured from a blow to the head.
Later on, the medical expert identified signs of trauma in her private areas and there were regions that seemed to bear traces of what appeared to be blood on her undergarments. However, bloodstains detected on her body didn’t align with the locations of these stains.
Initially, events unfolded as if they were heartbreaking and terrifying beyond belief. However, it soon became a mystery of bewildering circumstances: Why was there a ransom note when JonBenét didn’t seem to have been taken from her home? Or had she? Was the basement window tampered with or not? There were no footprints in the snow outside the house if an intruder was responsible. No one found her during the initial search of the house, which included a family friend briefly peeking into the wine cellar where she was eventually discovered, but did not turn on the light. Under such circumstances, how could a thorough forensic investigation ever be carried out, given that numerous people entered and exited the Ramseys’ home even before John moved his daughter’s body, potentially contaminating evidence?
Currently, a collection of books, news reports, documentaries, and TV films are delving into, scrutinizing, and re-enacting the investigation. As stated by the Boulder Police Department, they’ve examined over 1,500 pieces of evidence, which includes 1,000 DNA samples, their Major Crimes Unit has investigated and pursued 21,016 tips, letters, and emails, and detectives have conversed with more than 1,000 individuals across 19 states.
Even after 27 years have passed, I find myself still grappling with the mysteries surrounding the tragic death of JonBenét Ramsey. Despite countless investigations, her murder remains an enigma that has yet to be solved, leaving me and countless others yearning for answers.
Have there been any recent developments in the JonBenét Ramsey murder case?
No one has faced charges for her death; however, a single individual admitted guilt and was apprehended, yet his confession was later deemed false. Over time, various suspects have been suggested, but no evidence has led to a definitive conclusion.
Elizabeth Vargas, who hosted A&E’s 2019 special “Hunting JonBenét’s Killer: The Untold Story,” expressed to TopMob News that there is a strong possibility the truth behind JonBenét’s murder may never come to light. She personally believes that it’s highly unlikely one person committed this crime, instead suggesting at least two individuals were involved. This means that at least two people out there hold the secret about what really happened. It astonishes her that these individuals have managed to keep their silence for so long, considering how difficult it is to maintain such a secret and that others in their lives might know the truth. She points out that many cold cases have been solved decades later, and she thinks this could be one of them.
Ahead of the 25th anniversary of JonBenet’s death in 2021, the Boulder Police Department announced that they’ve modernized over 750 DNA samples using cutting-edge technology, expressing optimism about finding a match in the future.
John Ramsey, aged 80, who featured in the January 2021 Discovery+ documentary titled “JonBenét Ramsey: What Really Happened?“, shared with USA Today that despite his involvement, he found it extremely challenging to watch the entire program due to its emotional intensity.
He shared that the death of JonBenét temporarily extinguished his will to live. The police’s actions disrupted his normal life significantly, and this prolonged abnormality in how he was treated and mistreated affected him for a considerable time.
Why were JonBenet Ramsey’s parents considered suspects in her death?
For over a decade, John and Patsy continued as persons of interest, though not always the focus of active inquiry. After battling ovarian cancer, Patsy passed away on June 24, 2006, and was laid to rest beside JonBenét, still enveloped by suspicion.
According to John’s statement in USA Today, the police quickly formed an opinion on that day and the following day, then attempted to gather evidence to support it. However, the evidence they uncovered was actually inconsistent with their initial conclusion. Despite this, they never acknowledged their mistake and spent numerous years and millions of taxpayer dollars trying to prove something different instead.
In December 2003, evidence samples were sent to the FBI for DNA analysis. In a letter made public in 2008, former Boulder County District Attorney Mary Lacy informed John that advancements in DNA technology had led her to believe neither he, Patsy, or their son Burke Ramsey were involved in the crime. Instead, the test results suggested an unidentified male might have been responsible.
She expressed her regret if in any manner our actions could have given the impression that you were involved in this crime. I sincerely apologize for this potential misunderstanding.
Eight years later, an inquiry by Boulder’s Daily Camera and 9 News raised doubts about the reliability of her decision to officially exonerate the Ramseys based on the DNA evidence. In October 2016, they reported that there were three unique genetic markers (previously known about two, this was the first public disclosure of the third) found on the child’s pajamas. The investigative outlets further revealed that the sample used to clear suspects might not have originated from a single person’s DNA, but could potentially be a mix from multiple sources.
“If you’re searching for someone who doesn’t actually exist because multiple individuals are involved instead, it presents an issue,” stated Troy Eid, a former Colorado state’s attorney who assisted in the case review for the governor in 1999, to the newspaper in 2016.
In an interview with ABC News, Lacy spoke about the latest developments and ongoing criticism. She stated, “I’ve faced tougher situations than this…and it pales in comparison to what the Ramsey family has endured as suspects in their own daughter’s murder.” She explained, “I was striving to avert a terrible miscarriage of justice. I was terrified that despite the lack of evidence, no signs of psychopathy, and no motive, the case was like a runaway train, with the Ramseys tied to its track.”
Describing her crime theory, she mentioned the unusual finding during her visit to the Ramsey residence several days after the murder, when she was a deputy district attorney specializing in the Sexual Assault Unit. Specifically, she noticed an imprint resembling a bottom on the carpet outside JonBenét’s bedroom.
Lacy stated, “Everyone noticed it. The whole space remained untouched, except for a spot on the carpet within her room. It seems someone entered, stayed outside while she slept, and committed the murder once everyone was asleep.”
How has the media covered the JonBenét Ramsey case over the years?
Back in 2016, it seemed odd to consider this case as cold, since the ongoing intrigue, the persistent curiosity, the relentless pursuit for answers surrounding JonBenét’s murder remained as fresh and compelling as if it had just happened.
Absolutely, the case was extensively commemorated with two fresh documentaries on TV, including Lifetime’s “Who Killed JonBenét?” which aired 16 years following the initial broadcast of CBS’s miniseries titled “Perfect Murder, Perfect Town: JonBenét and the City of Boulder“. Lawrence Schiller‘s screen version of his book on the investigation featured Marg Helgenberger portraying Patsy and Dyanne Iandoli as JonBenét.
In September 2016, Dr. Phil McGraw created a stir with his extensive interview of JonBenét Ramsey’s older brother – the sole individual residing in the house during her death who had previously remained silent about the case. At the time, he was just 9 years old and though not an official suspect, there had been lingering suspicion regarding him as well.
It seemed that Burke had a conversation with Dr. Phil prior to CBS airing their two-part special, “The Case of: JonBenét Ramsey”. A group of investigators and forensic experts met to delve into the case, going as far as constructing a replica of the Ramsey residence for an exact recreation of the scene at the time of JonBenét’s death. The investigation was structured in such a way that it implicated Burke, including having a 10-year-old boy mimic striking a fake skull with a flashlight to understand the potential impact of the crime.
In response to the CBS program, Burke initiated a defamation lawsuit worth $150 million against Dr. Werner Spitz, labeling the forensic expert (notably a witness for the defense in the Phil Spector murder trial) as someone who craves publicity and repeatedly injects himself into high-profile cases to make unsubstantiated, false, and sensationally harmful statements and allegations.
The dispute between the two parties was peacefully resolved in January 2019, leading to a settlement being declared.
Burke explained to Dr. Phil, “I understand that many believe I was involved or that my parents were, but we were merely suspects. I intend to pay tribute to her memory through this interview, ensuring she is not forgotten.”
There was no danger of that happening.
Interestingly, despite John and Patsy’s persistent efforts in the public sphere – employing private detectives, even offering a monetary incentive – the real facts of the case continue to elude exposure. It seems we may never uncover the truth completely.
In Nancy Grace’s words to TopMob News in 2016, she expressed her belief that the JonBenét Ramsey case continues to captivate people because it involves the tragic murder of a child, the crime scene suggests staging, and remains unsolved. She emphasized that true justice has yet to be served.
Why has the murder of JonBenét Ramsey remained so fascinating to people?
Reflecting on the captivating nature of the O.J. Simpson trial, which took place over 25 years ago after his acquittal for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, it’s not astonishing at all that so many people are still eager to uncover more information about the Ramsey case.
As a lifestyle expert, I find it fascinating that the mystery surrounding JonBenét Ramsey’s murder continues to captivate us, from armchair detectives to true crime enthusiasts. With the rise of podcasts and the growing popularity of true-crime-inspired content, it seems we all share a common curiosity about this unsolved case.
In my professional opinion, everything about this situation – where the undeniable facts were unsettlingly clear – simply didn’t add up. Reflecting on the forensic analysis, the countless interviews, and the immense resources dedicated to the investigation, one can’t help but question how justice is served in such cases. After all, shouldn’t there have been enough evidence to bring this case to a resolution? Were we dealing with criminal masterminds who outsmarted the system, or was it the audacity of a well-funded lie that gained traction, bolstered by an entrenched social hierarchy?
In this case, there’s always been a captivating debate among authorities regarding the final question. Some strongly believed, either immediately or after many years, that the Ramseys were escaping justice for murder, while others felt that the couple was unjustly accused and the true culprit was still at large, evading capture.
Grace continued, “I still don’t believe Mr. Ramsey was responsible for his daughter’s death, but the idea that someone would pretend to kidnap her, leave a ransom note, only to then decide to kill her and hide the body in the basement is deeply troubling and has left many people feeling uneasy since the incident occurred.”
Who killed JonBenét Ramsey?
From day one, this was going to be a crime that made national news.
The scenario was rich in details: The victim wasn’t just any child, but a charming 6-year-old Caucasian girl from a prosperous family. The location was the idyllic, unusually secure city of Boulder; the tragic death of JonBenét, happening five days before the end of 1996, marked the city’s first recorded homicide that year. Investigations revealed signs of sexual abuse. Often, crime and popular culture share a deep connection, turning the captivating victim into a deeply sad symbol of fame, while the media were at their peak excitement level.
And the weird details just kept coming.
1. In terms of length, the disjointed ransom note stretched over nearly three pages, which was the longest the FBI had ever encountered. An unusual sum of $118,000 was the demand made in this note. After JonBenét’s body was discovered, John attempted to arrange for the family to fly privately to Atlanta that same evening, citing urgent affairs. However, police intervened to prevent this, and they were permitted to depart from town only three days after the incident.
Surprisingly, on New Year’s Day, 1997, John and Patsy conducted a nearly 40-minute interview with CNN, well before they had any extensive conversations with investigators.
“There is a killer on the loose,” Patsy told CNN’s Brian Cabell. Added John, “Absolutely.”
Then the pageant footage started circulating.
Why did the JonBenét Ramsey case put child beauty pageants under the microscope?
In those days, the images of six-year-old JonBenét, which were alongside the headlines, are indelibly linked with her thoughts. She appeared as a tiny doll in some pictures, yet strangely mature in glamour shots, making it hard not to feel that contradiction.
In June 1996, JonBenét participated in the Royal Miss state pageant held in Denver, and in July, she clinched the title of Gingerbread Production of America’s Little Miss Colorado, Mini Supreme division. During this period, JonBenét’s mother desired a professional portfolio for her daughter, resulting in numerous photos featuring heavy makeup that would be widely viewed a few months later. On December 17, she was crowned Little Miss Christmas at the All Star Kids Christmas pageant held at the Airport Holiday Inn on Denver’s outskirts. In an event sponsored by America’s Royal Miss, she made an appearance at a nearby shopping mall on December 22.
One week following her death, ABC’s Denver affiliate broadcast videos of JonBenét participating in a Christmas pageant. Later, Sunburst provided additional footage to another television station from the summer. It was the first time many people learned about beauty pageants specifically for young children.
Grace shared with TopMob News that it was captivating for people. She explained that unlike most child victims, there were numerous photos and videos of her available, allowing the public to see her repeatedly. This repeated exposure made people feel as though they knew her personally. As a result, when JonBenét passed away, the public grieved more profoundly because they felt a personal connection with her.
Discussions about the appropriateness of child beauty pageants, such as that of JonBenét, were already heated fourteen years prior to the airing of “Toddlers & Tiaras” on TLC. Some argued it was inappropriate for children so young, despite any talent segments involved, while others saw it as blatant exploitation. Additionally, these pageants often tarnished the images of the participants’ parents, particularly their mothers, raising suspicions and potentially casting them as villainous figures.
“Pam Paugh expressed her sorrow on the ‘Today’ show in 2010, four years following Patsy’s passing. She stated that anyone who experiences a similar situation, as our family did, will face not one but two heartbreaking events: first, the grief of losing your loved one, and secondly, the complete disintegration of the rest of your family due to the unjust persecution they endured.”
Initially, the investigation into the case centered around the couple under scrutiny, but it was later criticized during its early stages. Regrettably, Detective Linda Arndt provided the Ramseys’ lawyer with a set of questions that the police wanted John, Patsy, and Burke to answer. This action aimed to extract information from the family while they were in Atlanta for JonBenét’s funeral, hoping to clarify details like their sleep schedules. However, the district attorney’s office found this move problematic later on.
Initially, there was disagreement between the Boulder Police and the District Attorney’s Office regarding the approach to the investigation. They each had different opinions on how the case should be handled. Despite sharing the common goal of building a case against the Ramseys, allegations of information leaks surfaced, and resentment grew between them.
Patsy and John didn’t speak with investigators in an official setting until April 30, 1997. Immediately following this, they attempted to clarify to journalists why they hadn’t met with the police earlier.
“John made it clear: ‘I didn’t kill my daughter JonBenét.’ He found unfounded rumors about her being sexually abused particularly distressing as a family. These allegations are completely fabricated, he stressed. JonBenét and I shared a very close bond, and I will always deeply mourn her.”
Speaking up here, I firmly state that neither John nor I could ever be associated with such an abhorrent, vile act – the murder of JonBenét. Allow me to clarify, I had absolutely no hand in this tragic event.
At the closing of the news conference, John addressed the camera, expressing firmly, “I promise to track you down. I will locate you. This pursuit is my unwavering goal for the remainder of my existence.”
“Patsy concurred: ‘They’ve given us their word – this mystery will be unraveled by the police and investigators. For now, you might evade capture, but rest assured, your identity won’t remain hidden forever. We’ll track you down.'”
The probe persisted, as the Ramseys’ privilege held a dual impact on them. They managed to hire an elite legal team who eventually proved their family’s innocence. However, their wealth and status also made them attractive targets for media scrutiny, while providing investigators with additional motivation to delve more deeply into the case.
1998 saw Boulder Police submit their case regarding JonBenét’s death to the prosecutors. In September of the same year, these prosecutors began presenting their case to a grand jury. However, by October 1999, the District Attorney’s office announced that there was insufficient evidence to bring charges against either John or Patsy in connection with JonBenét’s death. Remarkably, an unsealed indictment from 2013 revealed that prosecutors had accused the parents of two counts each of causing death through child abuse back in 1999.
Around March 2001, the pair initiated a lawsuit for defamation, amounting to $80 million, against the Boulder Police Department. This legal dispute eventually concluded with a confidential settlement.
Who were people of interest in the JonBenét Ramsey murder case?
Other people who have been linked to the case over the years include:
In April 2006, investigators became aware of John Mark Karr, a former school teacher, due to tips from Michael Tracey, a professor at the University of Colorado who specialized in journalism and documentaries. According to Tracey, Karr had contacted him back in 2002, and over time, a tale unfolded through their correspondence about Karr allegedly having an accidental involvement in the death of a child he was romantically linked to.
Investigators tracked down Karr’s phone calls to Thailand, where he was apprehended and admitted to unintentionally killing JonBenét. Evidence from Karr’s family showed that he was with them in Georgia on the night JonBenét died, and no charges were brought against him after DNA tests failed to connect him to the crime.
In October 2006, Pam, Patsy’s sister, spoke with CNN, saying, “This is another emotional setback for us, but it seems Lady Justice has made her decision today when Karr was cleared.” She added, “I believe this case isn’t finished yet, and I think it’s wise to be patient and wait for further developments now.”
In August 2022, Gary Oliva was identified by the investigative series “48 Hours Investigates” as a person of interest. This was due to reports suggesting he was near the Ramsey residence on the night of the murder and attended a vigil for JonBenét on the first anniversary of her death. The show mentioned that he had phoned a close friend some time after JonBenét’s passing, expressing remorse by sobbing about doing something terrible.
In June 2016, Oliva was taken into custody for allegedly holding illegal child pornography. Sarah Huntley, Boulder City’s public relations officer, informed the Daily Camera that the police department has had prior dealings with him due to their investigations related to the Ramsey case and his criminal background as a registered sex offender.
As someone who has spent many years working in law enforcement, I can say with confidence that investigations are often complex and require a thorough examination of all available evidence before any conclusions can be drawn. In the Ramsey case, while the police department has found probable cause to make an arrest, they are not yet ready to definitively identify a suspect. It is crucial to remember that every individual has the right to due process and a fair trial. Based on my experience, it’s essential not to jump to conclusions or speculate about who might be involved in such high-profile cases until all the facts have been fully evaluated.
As an ardent admirer, let me share my perspective from the heart. In a captivating conversation within the show, Olivia asserted her innocence, claiming, “I firmly believe she visited me post her untimely demise and unveiled herself to me. I yearn to witness a memorial dedicated to her. To my knowledge, such a tribute has yet to be established, anywhere.”
In 2019, addressing a claim that Oliva admitted in a letter to unintentionally taking JonBenét’s life, the Boulder police declared through a public statement that they had previously conducted a comprehensive investigation on his confessions and found nothing new to report.
Ollie Gray, a private investigator initially hired by the Ramseys for the case, later pursued his own investigation and grew convinced that Michael Helgoth was the culprit. It’s worth noting that Helgoth’s family ran a scrap yard on Boulder’s outskirts during that time. In April 2016, John Kenady, who worked with Helgoth, disclosed to ‘In Touch Weekly’ that he had heard rumors of a tape where Helgoth admitted to killing JonBenét. Kenady claimed that he contacted the police around 20 times in the months following the murder, but did not receive any substantial response.
Helgoth was found dead Feb. 15, 1997.
Two days ago, Boulder District Attorney Alex Hunter delivered a press statement, directly addressing the camera and saying, “I’d like to speak to the individual or individuals who perpetrated this heinous act and stole our baby. The pool of suspects is shrinking. Soon, there will be no one left on the list but you…You have erased any compassion we might have initially felt during this investigation. We are determined that justice will prevail in this case, and you will pay for your actions. We are certain that this will come to pass.”
Helgoth’s death from a gunshot wound was classified as suicide, but Kenady expressed doubts and suggested that another person involved in JonBenét’s murder may have silenced him by killing him instead. However, after further investigation, it was discovered that Helgoth’s DNA did not match the traces found at the crime scene, ultimately clearing his name posthumously.
Is the JonBenét Ramsey murder case still open?
On March 17, 1997, retired Colorado Springs Police Detective Lou Smit, who had solved over 200 cases in his career, was brought into the investigation. He was summoned by Hunter’s office to aid in constructing a case against the Ramseys, but after serving for approximately 18 months, he resigned, stating in his letter, “The Ramseys were not involved.”
Smit compiled a list of alternate suspects during that time, including Oliva.
In an interview with the Denver Post before his passing in August 2010, Smit (portrayed by Kris Kristofferson in Perfect Murder, Perfect Town), asserted that there was never any instance of physical or sexual abuse. He explained, “People don’t suddenly transform into something; usually, there are warnings. John would regularly call his children when he was on tour. His ex-wife stated that he was a good father.” (John had two adult children from his previous marriage to Lucinda Pasch. Their eldest daughter, Elizabeth, tragically passed away in a car accident in 1992.)
Smit pointed out that detectives neglected to carry out specific tests which might have provided more evidence against or cleared the Ramsey family, citing various problems in the initial stages of the investigation as his reason.
He stated, “You’ve got one chance to get it right,” referring to the action at hand. Smith hypothesized that the house should have been properly secured, as the crime scene appeared disorganized. He suggested that the killer likely entered the Ramsey house on Christmas night, killed JonBenét, and may have planned to move her body from the house using a suitcase found near a broken basement window. Contrary to some beliefs, Smith believed there were indications of forced entry through that particular window.
In an interview with The Post, Smit hinted that the killer’s identity could be hidden within the case file due to one of the numerous tips given to the police. He further suggested that by then, the culprit might have been imprisoned for another crime. However, he cautioned against fixating on a single suspect, as doing so would hinder the solution. He also dismissed the notion that the murder was intentionally staged to appear like something other than what it truly was, such as the act of a sexual sadist instead of the consequence of domestic abuse.
However, James Kolar, who served as the lead investigator for the Boulder District Attorney’s office from 2005 to 2006 in the case at hand, did not support the idea that an intruder was involved.
In his self-published book, “Foreign Faction: Who Really Kidnapped JonBenét?”, Kolar wrote: “It seems unwise to base the entire investigation on a single piece of evidence, such as the DNA samples, which might not definitively be connected to the actual kidnapping or murder event.”
Exploring the Ramsey Murder Investigation: Insights from Steve Thomas, the Investigator
Thomas, who collaborated with Lou Smit on this case for a while, similarly found the Ramsey family’s conduct during the initial stages of the probe to be rather peculiar or unusual.
Thomas said to the Denver Post in 2000 that he wasn’t the only one with this viewpoint. The FBI and the police department backed us, except for Detective Linda Arndt. However, it seems that Thomas is the sole person taking a different stance on this matter, as Detective Arndt was the lone voice opposing our position. (Detective Arndt was among the first investigators at the Ramsey residence on Dec. 26, before JonBenét’s body was discovered.)
Throughout, the Ramseys vehemently maintained their innocence, including in their own book, 2000’s The Death of Innocence.
At least 10 books had already been published about JonBenét by then.
On Larry King Live in 2000, John expressed his frustration, shared by the police and the public, about the fact that no one had been held accountable for JonBenét’s murder. He emphasized the public’s need for closure, as they find it unbearable to think that such a monster remains at large. According to him, this is one of the reasons behind the rush to judgment, as people yearn for an answer to this horrific event.
In 2010, investigators carried out new interviews, hoping to uncover some information. According to Ramsey family attorney Lin Wood, they met with Burke and provided a contact card for him to reach out if he wished. However, it was reported that the police had not interviewed Burke themselves.
“Frankly speaking, if there’s any contact between us and Burke, it won’t be related to the case itself, but rather because John and Burke might serve as valuable witnesses in our investigation. As far as I understand, they’ve possibly received a lead that could yield crucial information from Burke.”
In a 2015 interview with Barbara Walters, John expressed that he believed either DNA analysis might reveal the truth about his daughter’s murder or else someone privy to the information could grow frustrated or resentful and ultimately come forward.
Reflecting on the time shortly after JonBenét’s passing, John expressed, “When something deeply unfortunate occurs in your life, pause your life. Hand over your financial matters to a reliable acquaintance. Abstain from taking any significant actions. This is because you may not be able to make sound decisions during such emotional times.”
As a follower dedicated to the case, I can affirm that the statement holds true for each individual associated with it. Stan Garnett, who succeeded Mary Lacy as the Boulder District Attorney, considered her exoneration of the Ramseys in 2008 as having little legal impact. He made this clear to the Daily Camera, expressing that he would not be obligated by her actions should the case progress under his leadership.
In a statement made to the newspaper in October 2016, former state’s attorney Troy Eid remarked, “It’s astonishing how many cases are resolved long after they occur, and as DNA technology advances, it can both clear up uncertainty and introduce new doubts.”
He added, “It’s not too late for justice.”
Watch
TopMob News
Read More
- CYBER PREDICTION. CYBER cryptocurrency
- ZK PREDICTION. ZK cryptocurrency
- LDO PREDICTION. LDO cryptocurrency
- FARM PREDICTION. FARM cryptocurrency
- BADGER PREDICTION. BADGER cryptocurrency
- DOP/USD
- Yellowjackets Season 3 Reveals First Cast Photos and One of Them is Devastating
- JASMY PREDICTION. JASMY cryptocurrency
- DEEP PREDICTION. DEEP cryptocurrency
- AVAX PREDICTION. AVAX cryptocurrency
2024-08-06 15:22