Is OpenAI’s new ChatGPT-4o image generator the end for graphic designers? — Weekend discussion 💬

by

Recently, there’s been quite a buzz surrounding OpenAI, and it’s not solely due to its recent $40 billion funding by SoftBank. Instead, it’s primarily because of ChatGPT-4o’s innovative image generator that has been making waves on social media, particularly with the Ghibli memes it produces.

In the realm of technology, AI-generated images are no longer novel; people have been able to produce intricate artwork using tools like Microsoft Copilot and ChatGPT, which utilize the image generation capabilities of OpenAI’s DALL-E 3.

Initially, the capabilities of generating images with these tools were nothing short of remarkable. However, users found ways to circumvent the limitations set in place, which originally prohibited the creation of explicit depictions featuring public figures such as Taylor Swift. As a result, stricter censorship measures were implemented, which some argue had the unintended consequence of significantly restricting the tools’ creative potential, almost to the point of artistic impairment.

As a tech enthusiast, I’ve noticed an intriguing trend: AI-driven tools such as Midjourney and ChatGPT have been making waves in architectural and interior design sectors due to their impressive image generation capabilities. However, it’s fascinating to learn that while these tools can whip up complex structural designs in a blink of an eye, they seem to stumble when it comes to creating simple white images. This suggests that while AI is advancing rapidly, there’s still room for improvement and human creativity remains irreplaceable in certain areas.

Instead, it appears that the latest ChatGPT-4 image generator by OpenAI has mostly quelled concerns in this regard. For example, this tool is now capable of depicting a glass overflowing with wine, whereas previous AI tools could only generate glasses that were either half-full or half-empty, depending on one’s perspective.

The unfettered and unrestrained quality of ChatGPT appears to be a significant attraction, as it managed to amass more than a million new users in just an hour upon release. During the launch, OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, highlighted this characteristic.

Our goal is to ensure that the tool generates content that isn’t offensive without your permission. However, if you explicitly ask it to produce something potentially offensive, we strive to do so, as long as it’s appropriate and reasonable.

According to our model’s specifications, we believe empowering users with intellectual freedom and control is a proper decision. We’ll monitor its progress and remain responsive to societal feedback.

It appears that OpenAI allows users to quickly create their own recipes, and people are using Studio Ghibli memes extensively on social platforms. Even Sam Altman requested users to calm down as the GPUs are overheating, and the team requires rest.

More recently, I suggested that the unlimited image generation capability of ChatGPT-40 might not last long due to potential censorship issues. However, it appears that this isn’t a significant worry for many users; instead, they seem more focused on job security concerns.

ChatGPT-40 is an impressive advancement in comparison to DALL-E 3, nearly capable of producing images resembling real life. However, it tends to make errors with mathematical calculations and its output appears somewhat artificial or CGI-like.

Will ChatGPT-4o image generator replace graphic designers?

Among the countless social media posts sharing beloved Studio Ghibli artwork, I’ve also come across numerous discussions from creators expressing anxiety about their employment stability within the artistic sphere, given the growing influence of AI-powered tools like ChatGPT-40’s image generator.

Based on the posts I’ve come across, it seems like users find themselves in a sort of dual reality. On one side, they express profound fear that their jobs might become obsolete due to advancements in AI, potentially within a few years.

In contrast, certain users appear to have integrated AI tools into their daily tasks and are even considering enhancing their skills in AI. A Redditor humorously hinted at his own choice of career path: “And I’m only half joking – it looks like I should start learning about AI, right?

Welp that’s my 4 year degree and almost a decade worth of Graphic Design down the drain… from r/singularity

The idea that AI might replace human jobs is nothing novel. Previously, programmers found themselves under scrutiny, being labeled as the initial professions potentially at risk of being impacted by AI developments.

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA, hinted that coding might not be the best choice for future generations due to the rapid growth and integration of Artificial Intelligence. Instead, he suggested careers in biology or farming as viable alternatives. Notably, Cursor AI recently declined a user’s request to generate code, stating that producing code for others could result in dependence and lessen opportunities for learning.

Artists are swift to identify flaws in images produced by AI, which could be seen as an obvious showcase of their skills and expertise compared to AI technologies.

As an observer, I find it apparent that the angle seems off, almost as if it depicts someone flipping a pancake. Your interpretation of this AI-generated image certainly lends itself to a clearer understanding. However, it’s important to note that most people might not perceive or be concerned about such details.

End of graphic designers….. from r/OpenAI

Regarding this matter, it is still uncertain how AI will affect jobs, but Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates thinks that AI could take over most tasks, potentially leading to a scenario where professionals work for only two days a week.

From my perspective as a researcher, Elon Musk, the visionary behind X Corporation and a renowned entrepreneur, posits that artificial intelligence (AI) may displace human jobs, effectively transforming work into a pastime or leisure activity. According to him, people might continue working primarily for personal satisfaction rather than financial necessity.

It’s clear that in the age of AI, jobs are swiftly changing. However, as one Reddit user points out, AI doesn’t signify the demise of engineers, animators, or designers.

Or, more concisely:

AI might be transforming jobs, but it’s not eliminating professions like engineering, animation, and design.

Instead of employing four designers, companies might opt for two, as they can both leverage AI to complete tasks more swiftly and efficiently. This doesn’t mean traditional design roles are obsolete; rather, they’re adapting and evolving, much like they have done over the past 30-40 years.

I’d be interested to hear your opinions about the future role of graphic designers and illustrators given the rise of advanced AI-driven tools such as ChatGPT-4 for generating images. What do you think their future might look like in this context?

Read More

2025-04-04 22:09