Kathleen Kennedy Declares Star Wars Can Move On Without Luke Skywalker!

by

Kathleen Kennedy doesn’t think the future of Star Wars lies in honoring its past.

Kathleen Kennedy, President of Lucasfilm, is facing criticism from devoted Star Wars enthusiasts once more. This time, it’s due to recent comments she made during a promotion event for a unique cinema screening of the 1977 Star Wars film at the BFI Film on Film Festival in London. The event showcased the original version of the movie, a cut seldom accessible through contemporary home media. Interestingly, the screening seems to have taken place despite George Lucas’s persistent refusal to release the untouched versions of his films.

However, Kennedy was not merely present to unveil the movie; she also offered intriguing insights about the potential direction of Star Wars and, notably, aspects that Lucasfilm might choose to abandon in the coming times.

She expressed her belief that our current situation has expanded the range of narratives and filmmakers we can invite to share meaningful tales. These stories don’t necessarily need to align with every aspect of Star Wars, but rather can serve as independent tales that eventually interconnect to form a larger narrative.

The assertion mirrors Mark Hamill’s more recent political statements, who is renowned for his role as the legendary Luke Skywalker.

As a film aficionado, I find myself at a loss for words when it comes to the idea of returning. To phrase it more clearly, I feel that with all the captivating narratives yet untold, Luke’s presence seems unnecessary in their grand tapestry of storytelling.

When speaking on the TODAY Show, he expanded on this.

He remarked that his character’s ending in the sequel trilogy seemed final. In other words, all loose ends were tied up neatly for his character.” He further suggested that attention should be shifted towards fresh narratives and added, “They could explore genres such as Westerns, mysteries, or comedies. I believe it’s high time for something new.

It’s worth mentioning that Hamill was well-known for his criticism of how Luke Skywalker was handled in the Star Wars sequels. He even stated that the only way he could tolerate the portrayal was by envisioning himself as a different character named Jake Skywalker instead.

Collectively, Kennedy and Hamill’s remarks give us a vivid understanding of where Lucasfilm intends to steer the course. This new path seems to move away from the Skywalker saga’s heritage and the intricate narrative structure that was once synonymous with the Star Wars franchise.

Of course, that approach has already been tested—and failed.

Kennedy’s bold move for artistic liberty surfaced in the sequel trilogy itself, as she opted against establishing a unified, consistent narrative. Instead, she entrusted two directors, J.J. Abrams and Rian Johnson, each with distinct visions. They shaped the story according to their individual interpretations, without a definitive blueprint for the plot. The outcome was a trilogy that was internally contradictory. While The Force Awakens revisited familiar territory, The Last Jedi dismantled it, and The Rise of Skywalker attempted to reassemble the pieces frantically.

As a devoted film enthusiast, I must confess that the latest Star Wars trilogy left me utterly puzzled. The motivations of characters seemed to shift dramatically from one movie to another, plotlines were left hanging, and the once inspiring legacy of Luke Skywalker was twisted into a tale of failure and bitterness. Instead of weaving a saga that resonated deeply with Star Wars fans, it felt like Lucasfilm was more concerned with fulfilling their own artistic aspirations, rather than preserving the integrity of the franchise.

Kennedy’s recent remarks imply she hasn’t been taught from her past errors, as she continues to advocate for Star Wars to serve as an open platform for storytelling, instead of maintaining it as a long-standing mythology that reflects consistent themes, mood, and characters cherished by fans spanning generations.

Critics suggest that Kennedy’s use of language like “stories that hold significance for [the filmmakers]” might be why recent Star Wars media seems more fragmented in tone. Instead of prioritizing narratives that connect with viewers, it appears the franchise is being used as a platform for directors to convey their personal beliefs, which can sometimes disrupt continuity or alienate fans.

It’s worth mentioning that it’s significant that Kennedy showed the 1977 original cut of Star Wars – a movie associated with Lucas, whose ideals she now appears keen to disassociate herself from. However, it should be noted that Lucas did not endorse this particular presentation and has been well-known for his reluctance to release the untouched original trilogy officially.

For those longing for a revival of the original spirit in the Star Wars universe (a rekindling of respect for the history, characters, and clear morals as envisioned by George Lucas), it appears increasingly uncertain that under Kathleen Kennedy’s leadership at Lucasfilm, this will be achieved. Instead, Star Wars seems to have shifted away from being centered on Luke Skywalker, and is now more about whatever narrative the next filmmaker chooses to explore.

Whether that vision resonates with the audience… remains to be seen.

Read More

2025-06-16 15:56