Love Actually’s Director Only Learned People Thought Andrew Lincoln’s ‘A Stalker’ A Few Years Ago, But Reveals Making The Movie Was A ‘Catastrophe’

As someone who has grown up watching and rewatching Love Actually every holiday season, I can confidently say that it remains one of my all-time favorite Christmas movies. The unique blend of interconnected love stories, each with its own charm, makes this film a heartwarming and memorable experience. However, delving into the making of this masterpiece reveals a different story – one of confusion, learning experiences, and a bit of controversy.

“Indeed, Love Actually stands out as one of the finest Christmas films ever made, offering viewers a unique blend of 10 heartwarming love stories and an intriguing interconnectedness between them. This creative, authentic film serves to remind us all about the magical touch that love lends to the festive season. Yet, in retrospect, director Richard Curtis has referred to the production of this romantic comedy as a “disaster,” and more recently, viewers have questioned the actions of Andrew Lincoln’s character, which some now consider stalker-like.

In your initial viewing of “Love Actually”, the plotline between Mark and Juliet gave the movie an emphasis on unfulfilled love. It was revealed that Mark, being Juliet’s best man at her wedding, acted coldly towards her due to self-preservation to hide his genuine feelings for her. He visited her home with affectionate cards, and she reciprocated with a comforting kiss that helped him move on. Today, many viewers view this scene as Mark’s character exhibiting stalker-like behavior. The director of the Christmas film, Richard Curtis, admitted in an interview with Indiewire that he didn’t realize this concerning aspect of Mark until several years later.

I find it somewhat unusual. To be precise, around seven years ago, I was caught off guard during an interview when they mentioned, “We’re primarily focused on the stalker aspect,” and I asked, “What do you mean by that?” At the time, I wasn’t aware of that term. However, there were many intelligent individuals involved in the production at the moment, and we didn’t perceive it as a stalker scene. But if it holds intrigue or humor for various reasons now, then I guess our evolving world is indeed progressive.

Back in 2003, when “Love Actually” graced our screens, it was easy to empathize with Mark’s predicament – he loved a woman who ended up marrying his friend. His courage in expressing his feelings, even after the marriage, tugged at our heartstrings. The creative use of cue cards to convey love was undeniably adorable and perhaps even sparked Tom Holland’s own heartfelt tribute during the promotions for “Spider-Man: Far From Home”.

In the 2020s, it’s hard not to view Andrew Lincoln’s character’s actions in Love Actually as examples of stalker behavior, given his declaration of love for a taken woman. This is a sentiment shared by the cast, with the British actor himself admitting that the “sign scene” made him appear like a “strange stalker.” Keira Knightley, who played Juliet, experienced the repercussions of this iconic scene, stating that people often mimicked the card gestures for her, which she found both “creepy and sweet”. However, as Richard Curtis once described it, the “excellent stalking” scene was a product of its time. Today, such scenes are behaviors we hope no one emulates in an attempt to win someone’s affection.

Among the many commendable aspects of the film “Love Actually” lies its exceptional handling of an ensemble cast, providing a rich tapestry of diverse love stories that radiate warmth. Yet, weaving together numerous storylines in one movie proved to be quite a challenge for writer-director Richard Curtis.

An intriguing aspect of ‘Love Actually’ is that, upon its completion, it seemed like a disaster. It required six months of re-editing to grasp the lessons about crafting a multi-plot narrative. Initially, when I penned ‘Love Actually’, I believed the narrative would follow A, B, C, D, E, F, G. However, when dealing with multiple stories, the risk lies in not fully investing in any of them, leaving the audience disengaged. Consequently, you might find yourself oscillating between A, B, C, and so on, ultimately concluding a story prematurely compared to others by introducing a twist.

Editing multiple interwoven romantic storylines for a movie like “Love Actually” must have been quite challenging, as it’s not structured like an anthology film with distinct, standalone short stories. Instead, each sequence is presented in a non-linear manner, which means they don’t follow a traditional chronological order. This creative approach allows the audience to gradually get to know an intriguing ensemble of characters. As Richard Curtis noted, presenting the stories out of order helps keep viewers engaged by creating suspense as they wait for the pieces to fit together. I can only imagine how daunting it must have been to piece everything together in the editing room and ensure a smooth narrative flow right up until the end credits.

Despite some modern viewers perceiving the iconic cue card scene in Love Actually as “stalking” and finding the editing of the ensemble Christmas film challenging, it remains one of the most beloved holiday movies of the 2000s. Its enduring popularity is evident by the release of a sequel on NBC for the fundraising event “Red Nose Day” in 2017 and its continued cult following. You can now add this Golden Globe-nominated film to your Christmas watchlist, available on your Amazon Prime subscription.

2024-12-26 04:07

Read More