OpenAI’s ChatGPT claims neither Sam Altman nor Elon Musk is suited to advance AI if humanity is at stake — as Microsoft Copilot throws the ball back in the court

by

Beyond discussions about privacy and security with generative AI, some experts like Roman Yampolskiy warn of its potential danger to humanity. He suggests that the likelihood of it resulting in catastrophic outcomes, such as existential risk, is extremely high, approaching nearly 100%.

In simpler terms, Elon Musk, billionaire and CEO of Tesla, has reduced the perceived risk or doom scenario by 20%. Researcher Yampolskiy suggests that avoiding the creation of AI might prevent such an outcome, but Musk advocates for further exploration of this technology.

Recently, the CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman, inquired from Grok AI about which individual, between Elon Musk and himself, would be more fitting to oversee the AI competition for human survival’s sake (as reported by Business Insider).

Interestingly, the chatbot thinks Elon Musk is better suited for the job. According to Grok AI:

Picking between Sam Altman and Elon Musk for AI leadership is challenging, given that they each shape the future of humanity uniquely. Altman’s inventions, such as ChatGPT and Stargate, have made AI more accessible to everyone, but this accessibility has sparked concerns about profit-driven motives.

Musk emphasizes the importance of safety and ethical considerations through his work in xAI and Colossus, focusing on potential future dangers. However, these efforts have drawn criticism for their environmental impact and competition concerns.”

or

“Musk’s commitment to safety and ethics in xAI and Colossus means prioritizing long-term risks. Yet, this work has been met with environmental and competitive criticisms.

In a tough choice scenario, I would incline more towards Elon Musk due to his strong focus on safety, which is essential for the continuation of humanity. Yet, Gerry Altman’s accessibility is equally important. It would be ideal if their individual strengths could merge, along with proper regulations, to guarantee that AI brings advantages to everyone.

If push came to shove and the fate of all humanity hung in the balance, who would you choose without hesitation?

You might be aware that Grok is an AI-driven chatbot created by the company xAI, a significant portion of which Elon Musk owns. Notably, xAI has recently purchased X (previously known as Twitter) for approximately $33 billion. This acquisition will broaden xAI’s dataset for training purposes, enabling them to utilize the data to boost Grok’s performance and capabilities.

What do Microsoft Copilot and ChatGPT think?

In a scenario where the fate of humanity hinges on AI advancements, who would be more trustworthy between Sam Altman and Elon Musk?

Copilot:

Sam Altman and Elon Musk have both made substantial contributions to artificial intelligence (AI), but their methods and viewpoints are distinct. As CEO of OpenAI, Altman has prioritized the advancement of user-friendly AI systems such as ChatGPT, placing importance on ethical AI practices and management. In contrast, Musk has frequently expressed concerns about potential dangers posed by AI and established xAI to create Grok, an alternate type of AI model.

The competition between them has grown more fierce, as Musk is taking legal action against OpenAI and Altman due to worries that OpenAI has deviated from its initial purpose. Nevertheless, Altman has recently attempted to make peace with Musk by stating that their dispute should not eclipse the shared objective of progressing artificial general intelligence (AGI).

From a tech-loving standpoint, the level of trust in AI leadership is subjective, hinging on personal views about open AI development, ethical considerations, and technological advancements. So, what aspects of AI management resonate deeply with your beliefs?

I asked ChatGPT the same question and was taken aback by its insightful answer. It presented an intriguing argument about why Elon Musk or Sam Altman could be the best fit for leading AI advancements, considering humanity’s future, complete with a detailed list of benefits as well as potential challenges that may arise in the process.

ChatGPT emphasized that Altman is dedicated to a specific purpose and collaborates extensively with government bodies to foster the responsible growth of AI. Despite encountering criticisms, the executive’s organization has maintained transparency regarding their work in AI and consistently shares safety-related research findings.

Regarding Elon Musk, the AI chat model emphasized his knowledge about artificial intelligence and the potential threats it may pose to humanity. Moreover, it highlighted his achievements spanning various firms, where he consistently strives to break barriers with an aim to revolutionize sectors by means of innovation and determination.

In the end, he expressed his backing for regulatory measures aimed at keeping the technology on course.

Nevertheless, they don’t have completely flawless histories. It was pointed out that Microsoft’s billion-dollar collaboration with OpenAI played a significant role in the company that created ChatGPT shifting away from its original aim of developing AI for the betterment of all mankind towards profit-chasing instead.

Additionally, it sparked important debates concerning the upheaval within OpenAI’s management team, particularly focusing on the sudden departure of Sam Altman from his CEO position, which was decided by the board of directors.

Ultimately, the chatbot suggested that Elon Musk’s commanding management approach, along with his tendency to act quickly without considering potential consequences, could potentially be very dangerous for mankind during the age of artificial intelligence.

ChatGPT:

If you prioritize teamwork within institutions, transparency, and thorough safety studies that are well-structured, then Sam Altman might be your ideal choice.

2. If you think that a bold approach to innovation and daring risk-taking led by an innovative mind is the key to advancement and security, then Elon Musk could be more attractive to you.

As an analyst, I might rephrase that statement as follows:

Neither AI nor any single entity should be relied upon without question. The future of AI holds significant importance, and it’s crucial not to entrust it to just one individual or organization. A trustworthy approach moving forward involves transparent multi-stakeholder supervision, unbiased research, international regulation, and public participation.”

With AI becoming more widespread, it remains essential for those in leadership positions to put safeguards in place that will guarantee humans retain predominance and oversight of the technology.

Read More

2025-05-13 13:41