Sarah Michelle Gellar Would Need ‘Plastic Surgery’ to Play Buffy

Sarah Michelle Gellar joked about needing “quite a bit of cosmetic surgery” if she were to take on the role of Buffy once more.

In the years spanning 1997 to 2003, a 47-year-old actress rose to international fame by portraying Buffy Summers on the widely acclaimed supernatural television show known as Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Hinting at a potential comeback, the actress from “Cruel Intentions” has shared her thoughts on reprising her role. She mentioned that the producers might opt for a younger actor instead.

She shared with WHO magazine: “I believe I’d require significant cosmetic surgery, as I no longer resemble a teenager in my appearance. Regarding portraying her again, I’m not sure if my approach would be different. Buffy is an exceptionally beautiful character, and her beauty remains unchanged. However, they may choose someone more youthful if she returns. If people feel that I can still fight battles and save the world, I have no objections to that!

When asked about Buffy’s current whereabouts, she replied: “That question gets asked quite frequently, but I’m still not entirely certain. I prefer to imagine she’s enjoying a fulfilling, tranquil life, no longer burdened by the slaying she once had to do. However, I’m content with how we concluded our journey together. Buffy was a joy to portray, and I take pride in what she represented, what she continues to represent. She was more than just a character; she was part of a positive shift in the entertainment industry, challenging stereotypes.

As a devoted cinephile, I can’t help but reflect on my journey when revisiting Buffy the Vampire Slayer with my own little family, my two cherubs shared with my husband, Freddie Prinze Jr. The role I played in Buffy was more than just an acting gig; it transformed my life in ways I am incredibly proud of.

Asked if she ever revisits the program, she said: “I’ve watched a few with my kids, yeah.”

They adore it, and I’m delighted to join them in watching. Buffy had a profound impact on me. Unlike many series started at a young age that can feel limiting, this wasn’t the case for me. Buffy evolved; she attended college and then took on a maternal role, nurturing all the slayers. I never felt confined because there was so much room to grow. Moreover, I got to portray various characters as well.

10 TV Revivals That Were So Bad They Ruined Their Original Shows

1. Arrested Development (Netflix, 2013)

After being canceled by Fox in 2006 following a three-season run, fans eagerly followed the comedic misadventures of the Bluth family, a dysfunctional clan who arguably were ahead of their time, as their complex narratives would have thrived on streaming platforms rather than cable. This is likely why Netflix chose to revive the show with two more seasons in 2013 and 2018. However, these subsequent seasons fell short of recapturing the original show’s charm. The issue was that Season 3 ended nearly flawlessly, wrapping up all character storylines – Season 4 unfortunately undid all that progress. Critics panned Season 4 for feeling disjointed, leading to the release of a re-edited version that presents the story in chronological order. This isn’t a positive development.

2. The X-Files (Fox, 2016)

In the late 1990s, the revolutionary TV series The X-Files gained immense popularity and rekindled that excitement when it returned in 2016. The tenth season was branded an “event series,” and fans eagerly awaited its premiere. However, Fox’s two-season revival had its bright spots, but overall, the general consensus was that The X-Files had lost some of its luster, struggling to keep viewers engaged. Moreover, the series introduced significant changes to the original storyline, creating a confusing viewing experience for devoted fans. Sometimes, it’s better to cherish a series as a symbol of nostalgia rather than attempting a comeback.

3. The Odd Couple (CBS, 2015)

The TV series “The Odd Couple,” modeled after Neil Simon’s play, was a charming show that aired on ABC in the 1970s for five seasons. It centered around two divorced men with contrasting personalities who lived together, despite their differences. Over the years, several adaptations have emerged, but one that stands out is CBS’s 2015 revival featuring Matthew Perry as Oscar and Thomas Lennon as Felix. However, during its three-season run, “The Odd Couple” failed to resonate with critics, who eventually found the characters’ antics repetitive and even annoying. Keeping on making the same show without any changes? That seems like a form of insanity.

4. Gossip Girl (HBO Max, 2021)

The original series of “Gossip Girl” left a lasting impression due to its fashion-forward ensembles, contemporary soundtracks, and the relatable yet extravagant issues faced by its characters, creating a passionate fanbase. When HBO announced a spin-off of “Gossip Girl” years after its finale on The CW in 2012, fans were thrilled. Regrettably, the reboot of “Gossip Girl” struggled to adapt for Gen-Z audiences—the ambitious attempt fell flat. Interestingly, today’s youth seem less interested in the soap opera-like teen themes of “Gossip Girl,” preferring instead emotionally nuanced (and equally visually captivating) shows like “Euphoria.

5. Knight Rider (NBC, 2008)

Multiple efforts have been made to resurrect the popular ’80s show “Knight Rider,” starring David Hasselhoff as Michael Knight, a character who drove an advanced car. The latest attempt was in 2008, featuring Justin Bruening as Mike Knight (the son of the original Michael Knight). Although Hasselhoff appeared in the pilot episode, he didn’t reappear on the series, which soon had its episode order cut from 22 episodes to 17. Unfortunately, the 2008 version of “Knight Rider” turned out to be a time-consuming endeavor that failed to impress both critics and viewers.

6. Charlie’s Angels (ABC, 2011)

In the 1970s, the original “Charlie’s Angels” TV series gained significant popularity. ABC then attempted to reboot the show in 2011 with actresses Annie Ilonzeh, Minka Kelly, and Rachael Taylor portraying the famous angels. Unfortunately, this revamped version failed to engage viewers, leading ABC to cancel it after just four episodes. The final episode was never aired on ABC. Despite the series’ poor reception, Paul Lee, the head of ABC, expressed that while they didn’t fully succeed in reviving the franchise, their effort was a strong one according to an interview with “The Hollywood Reporter.

7. Heroes Reborn (2015, NBC)

After the supernatural drama “Heroes,” which aired on NBC from 2006 to 2010, came “Heroes Reborn.” This series focused on ordinary people discovering they had superpowers, similar to the original. However, unlike the original show, “Heroes Reborn” seemed less fresh and more formulaic — with fewer scenes showing actual use of these supernatural powers. Unlike many other shows on this list, “Heroes Reborn” was always planned as a standalone miniseries. It’s unfortunate that it filled the space where the original series’ captivating concept could have continued to unfold.

8. Fuller House (2016, Netflix)

The TV show “Full House” fulfilled its role during its 8-season run on ABC. Though it wasn’t highly praised by critics, it consistently attracted a large audience due to its heartwarming nature and endearing characters. Nevertheless, its straightforward storylines and lessons lacked the depth required for modern streaming platforms, where viewers seek content that challenges their minds. Netflix’s “Fuller House,” which spanned over 5 seasons, had the advantage of a majority of the original cast except for Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen. Additionally, it altered the show’s initial concept by swapping genders, an element that could have brought freshness. Regrettably, “Fuller House” failed to deliver on this promise. Instead, it leaned heavily on the same jokes and heartwarming moments as its predecessor, but these familiar elements felt tired from the very beginning.

9. MacGyver (CBS, 2016)

A significant factor contributing to the long-lasting appeal of the original “MacGyver” series was its DIY, ingenious nature. The character, portrayed by Richard Dean Anderson, utilized clever engineering solutions instead of resorting to violence to solve problems. The revamped ABC show aired on CBS from 2016 to 2021, but it differed significantly from the original in terms of atmosphere. Lucas Till stepped into the role of MacGyver, yet this version featured a team of skilled operatives instead of just one individual. The reboot seemed more contrived, more conventional, and more focused on spectacle, as criticized by USA Today, which described it as less like “MacGyver” and more like “MacGyver: Impossible.

10. Cupid (2009, ABC)

In a turn of events, when Rob Thomas was given the chance to revisit his previously canceled show “Cupid” by ABC, he eagerly seized the opportunity. Regrettably, he veered off course with this revival. The initial 1998 series had Jeremy Piven portraying Trevor Hale, a man convinced he was Cupid, while Paula Marshall played Dr. Claire Allen, his psychologist. Despite “Cupid” being cut short in its original run, the remake failed to attract the viewership needed for success. The new version essentially followed the same narrative, with Bobby Cannavale stepping into the role of Cupid and Sarah Paulson as Dr. Claire McCrae. Sadly, it only aired for seven episodes, making it last half as long as the first brief run of “Cupid” on television.

2025-01-22 23:55