Steven Spielberg & Tim Burton Produced 1 of the Worst Animated Sitcoms of All Time (& It’s Still a Disaster 32 Years Later)

by

Since the debut of “The Simpsons” in 1989, viewers have been captivated by animated television shows. These programs skillfully challenge and elevate common sitcom stereotypes, while their vibrant style infuses a dash of extra charm and ingenuity. Although some critics claim that series like “South Park” and “Big Mouth” are excessively crude, aficionados of this genre appreciate the freedom this format offers certain shows to push boundaries.

In the late 1980s, Tim Burton, Steven Spielberg, and Brad Bird attempted to create a unique impact in the industry through the show “Family Dog”. However, after years of development, viewers were disappointed by the end result. Despite “Family Dog” being largely forgotten, some fans continue to ponder how such talented creators could produce something so uninteresting.

Family Dog Recruited Some of the Biggest Names in the Business

1993 saw the debut of “Family Dog” on CBS, focusing on the everyday life of the Binsford family, an ordinary American household. As a devoted admirer, I can relate to Skip and Bev, the hardworking parents who constantly strive to maintain order in their bustling abode. Yet, it’s Bev’s dreams of escaping the monotony of the same four walls that resonate deeply with me. The Binsford kids, Billy and Buffy, are a handful, turning their otherwise perfect home into a playground of chaos. However, what truly captivates audiences is the unique perspective we get on this family through their beloved pet, Jonah, the family dog.

The idea for this animated sitcom traces back to 1987, when it was first created by the acclaimed animator Brad Bird. Initially aired on Steven Spielberg’s “Amazing Stories,” “Family Dog” tells the story of a mistreated dog who is often abused by his owners. However, in a twist, the dog exacts revenge by eating the family’s holiday ham while they watch in bewilderment and disbelief. This seemingly simple short film was actually a collaboration between some of the biggest names in the movie industry, including Brad Bird, Danny Elfman (composer), Chris Buck (additional animation), and Scott Menville (voice acting). Consequently, it’s not surprising that Spielberg chose to develop this animated series from the short film, given the involvement of these prominent figures in the world of animation.

Despite boasting an abundance of talent associated with this series, it surprisingly took six years for it to take flight. The sudden departure of Brad Bird from the project left the team without their writer and director, but they remained unfazed due to having another cinema icon at their disposal – Tim Burton, who served as a producer and contributed to character design. Before Family Dog made its debut on TV, viewers and critics eagerly anticipated seeing how Steven Spielberg would modernize the outdated realm of animation. However, he delegated much of the work to Taiwan-based Wang Film Productions. Although this studio was renowned worldwide for their work on numerous popular shows such as DuckTales, The Smurfs, and Inspector Gadget, Spielberg wasn’t satisfied with the quality of work produced. As a result, the show underwent significant changes and requested Nelvana to complete the final three episodes and address any inconsistencies.

It could be said that the delays in releasing “Family Dog” wouldn’t have been such a problem if Steven Spielberg hadn’t publicized the show early. Originally scheduled to premiere on March 20, 1991, it consumed a significant amount of advertising time during the Grammy Awards in February 1991. However, due to the lengthy animation process, the show didn’t actually air until 1993. It might be surprising for fans to learn that a project led by Spielberg and Tim Burton would encounter such difficulties, but the real challenge came during the television broadcast.

The Show Failed Miserably Against Its Competitors

To fully grasp why Family Dog was not successful, it’s crucial for fans to acknowledge the legitimacy of the initial 1987 short. When Family Dog debuted on Amazing Stories, Fox Network was rapidly gaining popularity and introducing viewers to the vibrant universe of The Simpsons. This suggests that if the team had worked more swiftly, Family Dog might have been better received. However, even when it eventually aired in 1993, it faced strong competition from shows like Capitol Critters and Fish Police. Consequently, many argue that due to its late release, Family Dog struggled to make an impact.

Despite high expectations, Family Dog failed to captivate viewers and critics alike, being criticized for its lack of originality and motivation. Critics also pointed out the show’s low production value given its six-year development period. In essence, the main criticism leveled against Family Dog was that it was painfully dull. Both Family Dog and The Simpsons aim to satirize modern life, but while The Simpsons manages to find humor in everyday life, Family Dog portrays existence as pointless. Characters in the show are often discontented, and even when Jonah appears to be the most content, he spends his time longing for other experiences.

Given that each episode of the show cost anywhere from $650,000 to $1 million to produce, fans didn’t hold back on their laughter when it quickly faltered. After only six weeks on television, CBS decided to pull the plug on the series, and Family Dog sank like a stone. Despite attempting to create some buzz by developing a video game, many critics contend that this game for the SNES is one of the worst ever produced.

This Series Proves That Too Many Cooks Spoil the Broth

An intriguing aspect about Family Dog is its lack of distinct character, which might go unnoticed unless viewers are informed. Given that this series was created by two renowned filmmakers, one might anticipate a darker theme or perhaps stop-motion animation. However, what viewers receive are rough sketches and dull environments instead. Similarly, the absence of a defined personality can also be observed in the work of Steven Spielberg.

The show “Family Dog” doesn’t take viewers on fantastical journeys or introduce them to bizarre and captivating creatures. Instead, it’s set in an unnamed town filled with one-dimensional characters that are painfully stereotypical. The protagonist, Jonah, is lackluster and fails to contribute much to the storyline. Unlike Gromit who communicates effectively through silence, or Brian Griffin who’s chatty, Jonah merely directs the audience’s attention rather than propelling the plot forward.

One major reason why Family Dog did not succeed is that it seemed to disregard the essence of animated sitcoms. Even though Matt Groening was relatively unknown before creating The Simpsons, he innovatively portrayed working-class America by making all characters yellow. Similarly, younger shows like South Park demonstrated a larger vision by crafting their characters out of construction paper. However, Family Dog fails to bring anything fresh; instead, it attempts to leverage other genres and claim the credit without offering any originality.

In summary, while the criticisms might seem too severe for some viewers given Burton and Spielberg’s ongoing successful careers, it’s essential to understand that animated sitcoms often face scrutiny due to their controversial nature or comparison to children’s cartoons, which can tarnish their image. Despite having Hollywood heavyweights like Burton and Spielberg, Family Dog didn’t push boundaries enough, instead opting to replicate familiar portrayals of American life dating back to the 1950s. This lack of innovation may have contributed to its failure to captivate a broader audience.

Read More

2025-06-01 04:11