You have used all your credits for this month. Please add more credits to continue.

by

The films “The Godfather” and its initial sequel are universally recognized as classics, yet opinions differ on which is the superior film. Although both frequently appear on lists of the greatest movies ever made, they each possess unique qualities that make them stand out, allowing viewers to form their own preferences based on these individual strengths and focal points.

Today, both The Godfather and its sequel, The Godfather Part II, remain highly relevant and well-regarded. While the third film, released 16 years later, may not have achieved the same level of popularity, it has not diminished the pristine reputation of the original two films. Regarding the ongoing discussion about which is superior between The Godfather and The Godfather Part II, no definitive answer may ever be reached.

10. Part I – Marlon Brando’s Oscar-Winning Performance Has Gone Down In History

The Godfather Is Arguably Brando’s Finest Hour

By the time Marlon Brando took up the role in “The Godfather”, he was well-established as a cinematic icon. However, many believe his portrayal of Vito Corleone is his finest and most memorable performance. He masterfully combines an air of menace with genuine sincerity in this role, subtly suggesting that there are deeper layers to his character than he often reveals.

The star-studded cast of “The Godfather” is filled with exceptional actors, but only the initial film features Brando’s portrayal of Corleone. Even with minimal screen time, Brando was awarded the Oscar for Best Actor for his performance. It’s difficult to dispute this recognition due to its significant impact. Indeed, Brando’s presence casts a long shadow over the subsequent two Godfather films.

9. Part II – Robert De Niro Shines As A Young Vito

Not Many Actors Could Have Followed Marlon Brando

In a notable portrayal, Robert De Niro skillfully steps into the role previously held by Marlon Brando, taking on the younger incarnation of Vito Corleone in The Godfather Part II. He masterfully incorporates some of Brando’s distinctive traits in his performance as Vito, including his leisurely tone and calculated actions, all while infusing the character with his own distinct flair.

In the absence of Marlon Brando or James Caan, The Godfather Part II might have struggled to maintain the raw charisma that permeates the initial film. Although other performers make significant contributions, Robert De Niro’s portrayal is pivotal, and he skillfully ensures that the flashback scenes are just as captivating as Michael’s narrative.

8. Part I – The First Movie Has More Iconic Moments

Most Of The Godfather’s Most Memorable Scenes And Quotes Come From The Original

The original “Godfather” film is where most of the franchise’s memorable scenes and quotable lines originate, possibly due to its freedom from the responsibility of carrying on a narrative. Many iconic quotes from “The Godfather” can be attributed to the first movie, with Marlon Brando earning numerous instances with his unique portrayal of Vito.

Francis Ford Coppola’s direction is particularly noteworthy in The Godfather Part II, but it’s the first film that features the famous scene with the horse’s head in the bed, introduces Vito at his daughter’s wedding, includes the baptism sequence at the end, depicts Sonny’s death, and more. Although The Godfather Part II is longer, it doesn’t quite pack as many shocking or memorable scenes compared to the original film.

7. Part II – Part II Presents A Gritter View Of Organized Crime

The Second Movie Corrects One Of The Common Criticisms Aimed At The Godfather

Initially lauded by critics upon its release, The Godfather faced criticism for apparently glorifying criminal activities such as the mafia. The brutal deeds committed by the Corleone family often occur off-screen, and the methods through which they acquire wealth remain somewhat unclear at times.

The second installment of “The Godfather,” titled “The Godfather Part II,” offers a grittier depiction of organized crime compared to its predecessor. Not only does it delve deeper into Michael’s tale and Vito’s ascension, but it also presents more instances of violence, deception, and shady political maneuvering. Whereas the initial film leans towards a somberly comic family saga, “Part II” provides a slightly unveiled glimpse into the underworld.

6. Part I – Part I Tells A Perfectly Contained Story

Part II Requires Some Backstory To Really Enjoy

As a film enthusiast, I’d say that while The Godfather Part II is an exceptional movie, one could still derive a satisfying cinematic experience solely from watching The Godfather. The original Godfather stands alone as a fully developed tale without any immediate need for a sequel. It chronicles the transformation of Michael Corleone, from his initial reluctance to engage in the family business to his eventual assumption of the role of Don Corleone following his father’s demise.

As a true fan, I can confidently say that the second part is undeniably one of the greatest sequels ever crafted. However, much like any other sequel, it leans heavily on its predecessor for context and understanding. Consequently, for a newcomer to fully appreciate the brilliance of the second installment, they would first need to watch the initial movie. While this isn’t inherently a disadvantage, The Godfather stands out because it is often enjoyed by many upon their first viewing without requiring any additional context, thus making it more accessible to a wider audience.

5. Part II – Part II Contrasts Michael’s Story With Vito’s Rise To Power

Michael And Vito’s Stories Play Out Simultaneously

Viewers often find that watching The Godfather Part II enhances their understanding of the initial film, as it delves into Vito’s journey to power, which serves as a compelling parallel to Michael’s storyline in the first movie. Comparing and contrasting these two characters results in an intriguing examination of character development.

How Different Review Aggregation Websites Rank The Godfather Movies
Website The Godfather (1972) The Godfather Part II (1974)
Rotten Tomatoes 97% 96%
Rotten Tomatoes (Audience Score) 98% 97%
IMDb 9.2 9.0
Metacritic 100 90
Ebaster 9.3 9.0

In the second segment, the ascent of Vito and the descent of Michael are depicted concurrently. While Michael concludes Part II by strengthening his control, he achieves this at a cost to his personal connections. Unlike Michael, Vito refrains from killing his own brother and ruining his marriage because family values drive him to commit violent and desperate acts. This distinction is less noticeable in the initial film.

4. Part I – The Original Has A More Unpredictable Narrative

Part II Is A Little Easier To Anticipate

As a devoted cinephile, I can confidently say that The Godfather is the type of exceptional drama film that keeps you guessing from start to finish. It’s far from clear whether Michael will step into Vito’s shoes or if the entire tale isn’t a cautionary narrative about the Corleone family’s descent. Shocking twists, such as Vito’s assassination attempt and Apollonia’s untimely demise, only serve to heighten the suspense.

In Part II, although it still carries an element of unpredictability, being a sequel makes it somewhat simpler to discern the main outlines of the story. However, the flashbacks to Vito’s past may be more foreseeable, even as the intricacies remain captivating.

3. Part II – Fredo Is More Interesting In Part II

John Cazale Takes On A Bigger Role

John Cazale’s debut film was “The Godfather,” and it marked the beginning of an impressive streak of five consecutive Best Picture nominations for him. Unfortunately, his career was tragically cut short when he passed away at 42 years old. However, his portrayal in the “Godfather” films remains a lasting proof of his exceptional acting abilities. Although Fredo is not a significant character in the first movie, he develops more prominently in “The Godfather Part II.

As Sonny and Vito depart the scene, the bond between Michael and Fredo assumes a fresh, intriguing dimension for me as a film enthusiast. Fredo begins to harbor feelings of being overlooked, and ultimately plots against Michael and our entire family. It’s not just Fredo who becomes more significant in Part II, as Kay also develops a new depth and complexity.

2. Part I – Part I Ends With A Flawless Final Shot

The Ending Wraps Up A Perfect Film

In my perspective, one of the most poignant scenes in “The Godfather” is subtly saved for last, leaving an indelible impression of Michael and Kay being torn apart. The climax of this masterpiece serves to underscore Michael’s metamorphosis into a ruthless Mafia chief, as he deceives both Connie and Kay by orchestrating the demise of Connie’s husband, a truth hidden beneath layers of falsehoods.

In addition, The Godfather Part II boasts a striking finale, largely due to its strategic use of flashbacks that contrast Michael’s leadership as Don with earlier times, as depicted in the initial film. Yet, it’s challenging to recreate the profound symbolism encapsulated in the concluding scene of the first movie, which masterfully wraps up the entire complex storyline.

1. Part II – The Sequel Expands Its Scope

Part II Has Broader Concerns Than The Original

In my perspective, the opening scene of “The Godfather” subtly hints at Francis Ford Coppola’s intention to portray America through this film, but it’s in “The Godfather Part II” where this concept truly takes shape. Compared to its predecessor, the sequel carries a broader perspective, using the interwoven narratives of Vito and Michael to shed light on some unsettling realities hidden within American society.

In addition to delving into political and historical aspects within its plotline, “The Godfather Part II” also touches upon some profound universal truths about the human condition. Certain elements from Michael’s tale appear strikingly similar to biblical narratives or the annals of the Roman Empire, lending a grandiose feel that surpasses the original film.

Read More

2025-05-27 17:12