Oh dear, Crypto.com’s in a spot of bother! It seems they’ve decided to reissue a whopping 70 BILLION Cronos (CRO) tokens that were previously given a lovely funeral pyre in 2021 π«π. The crypto community is having a right old meltdown about it, and we can’t say we’re surprised π.
Enter ZachXBT, the blockchain Sherlock Holmes, who’s taken to X (because, where else?) to accuse Crypto.com of being, well, a tad scammy π€. His exact words?…
βCRO is no different from a scam.β Ouch, harsh words, Zach! π³
Apparently, the initial token burn was meant to be, you know, PERMANENT π, reducing the circulating supply and all that jazz. But now, it seems Crypto.com’s all, “Nah, let’s just bring them back, shall we?” π€·ββοΈ. ZachXBT’s not having it, claiming this U-turn goes against the community’s wishes and concerns about centralized control π«.
This drama unfolds just as Crypto.com’s announcing a fancy partnership with Trump Media to launch some US crypto ETFs π. One can’t help but wonder if this token re-issuance is a case of “growth at all costs” π€.
Crypto.com’s CEO Tries to Calm the Storm βοΈ
Kris Marszalek, the CEO, jumped into an AMA (because crisis management is all about swift action, right? π) to defend the re-issuance. His explanation? The initial burn was just a defensive move during crypto’s “war” days π‘οΈ. Now, with the new US administration being all crypto-friendly π€, it’s time to get aggressive and grow, grow, GROW! π
β…the war on crypto is over… Thereβs a need for an aggressive investment to win.β π
He also assured everyone that this is what the community wants and needs to compete globally π. Though, one might argue, it’s a bit rich coming from a company that might just have a teensy bit too much control over the voting power π€«.
The Great Governance Debate π£οΈ
A report by Unchained has raised eyebrows, suggesting Crypto.com’s validators control a whopping 70% of the voting power on the blockchain π¨. It appears two major voters (allegedly controlled by Crypto.com, because why not? π) swung the decision with their massive CRO holdings. The proposal passed, but with a significant chunk of voters abstaining π€.
Critics are, understandably, up in arms about the lack of decentralization and transparency π«οΈ. Because, what’s crypto without a bit of democracy and openness, eh? π€·ββοΈ
Read More
- OM/USD
- Carmen Baldwin: My Parents? Just Folks in Z and Y
- Solo Leveling Season 3: What You NEED to Know!
- Jellyrolls Exits Disneyβs Boardwalk: Another Icon Bites the Dust?
- Despite Strong Criticism, Days Gone PS5 Is Climbing Up the PS Store Pre-Order Charts
- Solo Leveling Season 3: What Fans Are Really Speculating!
- The Perfect Couple season 2 is in the works at Netflix βΒ but the cast will be different
- Disneyβs βSnow Whiteβ Bombs at Box Office, Worse Than Expected
- Netflixβs Dungeons & Dragons Series: A Journey into the Forgotten Realms!
- Joan Vassos Reveals Shocking Truth Behind Her NYC Apartment Hunt with Chock Chapple!
2025-03-25 19:08