As a huge fan of George R.R. Martin’s world, it’s amazing to see it expanding with shows like House of the Dragon and A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms after Game of Thrones. But honestly, House of the Dragon has been under a lot of pressure since day one. It feels like it’s constantly being measured against its predecessor, having to prove that Westeros can still be compelling without the original characters and storylines. Look, Game of Thrones wasn’t perfect – that ending still stings for many of us – but it reached a level of cultural impact few shows ever do, and it gave us moments we’ll never forget. That makes the job of following it up incredibly tough for House of the Dragon.
Rather than trying to be exactly like the original series, House of the Dragon focuses on a specific conflict – the Targaryen civil war – and a more limited political landscape. This makes for a more focused and intense show, full of drama and harsh moments, but it also means it doesn’t have the same sweeping scale that attracted so many viewers to Game of Thrones. Is House of the Dragon better or worse? It’s not a simple question. Here are three areas where the new show excels, and three where it doesn’t quite measure up.
Makes It Better: Based on a Finished Story
Both series have a similar feel, but the spin-off is a stronger story because it’s based on a complete work. The ending of Game of Thrones was widely criticized, and people are still discussing it years later. This happened because the showrunners had to create the final season themselves, as George R.R. Martin hasn’t finished writing the book series yet.
Unlike Game of Thrones, House of the Dragon is based on Fire & Blood, a complete story with a defined beginning, middle, and end. This gives House of the Dragon a clear sense of purpose in every conflict and political maneuver – nothing feels accidental. Because the story’s foundation is already established, events feel more meaningful and less random, resulting in a more focused and cohesive narrative.
Doesn’t Make It Better: Limited Variety of Characters
While House of the Dragon has a decent cast, it doesn’t quite measure up to Game of Thrones in terms of characters. The show’s focus on the Targaryen family narrows the scope of the story and the number of characters we see. Game of Thrones featured a huge cast with diverse backgrounds and perspectives, but House of the Dragon mainly centers on the Targaryens and their immediate circle, which makes the world feel less expansive and the storytelling less varied.
This focus on fewer storylines also changes how the show feels to watch. With fewer characters and less variety, it loses some of its energy and excitement. The surprising twists and emotional impact we got from characters like Arya, Tyrion, and Daenerys are less frequent. While the story is simpler to follow, it’s also less intricate and feels less vibrant when it comes to character growth.
Makes It Better: A Sensible Ending
Similar to what’s been discussed regarding House of the Dragon knowing its ending from the start, a major strength is that the planned conclusion actually fits the story. The Game of Thrones finale was so divisive because many of the choices made didn’t feel true to how the characters had developed. While some argue a rushed timeline contributed to the issues, the overall storytelling lacked consistency. Because the spin-off has an ending already established by George R.R. Martin, it can build storylines more purposefully, leading to a conclusion that makes sense.
This results in storylines that make more sense and character choices that feel earned, rather than just being surprising. The show’s political and emotional arcs are also more consistent because everything is built on a solid foundation. For viewers disappointed with the way Game of Thrones ended, House of the Dragon delivers what was lacking: a story that feels intentional and conclusions that feel logical—though it’s still too early to say for sure, as the series hasn’t finished yet.
Doesn’t Make It Better: It Never Feels as Epic
While House of the Dragon delivers on spectacle with dragons and battles, it doesn’t quite reach the grand scale of Game of Thrones. Game of Thrones felt like it dealt with threats that could impact the entire world, like massive armies of the dead and continent-spanning wars. House of the Dragon, however, is more focused on the personal conflicts within a single family and the intricacies of politics, which makes the story feel more contained and less expansive, even when it looks amazing.
It’s not a flaw that this show is different – just a change in focus. Instead of large-scale wars across Westeros, the series concentrates on personal conflicts and political maneuvering within the court, and it does that well. However, viewers hoping for the epic, spectacle-driven moments that Game of Thrones often delivered – like the Battles of Winterfell and Blackwater Bay – might find House of the Dragon feels smaller in scope. While the drama is compelling, the stakes don’t always feel as enormous.
Makes It Better: A More Political and Intimate Plot
Although House of the Dragon isn’t about massive battles and sprawling landscapes, focusing on the Targaryen family actually makes the show stronger. It presents the struggle for power in a very personal way, highlighting how family conflicts and betrayals can change the destiny of the entire kingdom. The rivalry between Rhaenyra and Alicent, for instance, isn’t simply a fight over the Iron Throne; it’s about how individual decisions lead to significant political fallout. This type of intense, character-driven drama often feels more focused and captivating than the more widespread storylines of Game of Thrones.
Furthermore, the show’s close focus on characters makes them feel more developed. Every conversation and action directly affects their relationships and drives the main plot forward. This gives the series a clearer sense of direction and meaning than the original often had. So, if you enjoy political stories interwoven with personal drama, House of the Dragon is likely to be very rewarding.
Doesn’t Make It Better: Less Exploration of Cultures and Worlds
While House of the Dragon‘s focus on a smaller story is effective, it also makes the world feel smaller. Game of Thrones was great at showing off its huge universe, with places like Essos and Dorne, and many different cultures. This made the story feel massive and complex. House of the Dragon, however, mostly stays within Westeros and focuses on the Targaryen family. This limited scope also contributes to a lack of diverse characters and makes the series feel less expansive. We don’t get the same strong sense of a rich, varied world with unique cultures.
This change affects viewers who enjoyed how the original series made Westeros feel rich with unique cultures and stories in every location. While the new show is still strong with its political maneuvering and suspense, it doesn’t quite capture the same sense of a fully realized world. With fewer distinct places and customs, the story can sometimes feel smaller and more predictable, even with the addition of dragons and battles.
We’d love to hear what you think of both shows! Share your opinions in the comments below and join the discussion on the ComicBook Forum.
Read More
- Best Controller Settings for ARC Raiders
- 7 Home Alone Moments That Still Make No Sense (And #2 Is a Plot Hole)
- Stephen Colbert Jokes This Could Be Next Job After Late Show Canceled
- DCU Nightwing Contender Addresses Casting Rumors & Reveals His Other Dream DC Role [Exclusive]
- Is XRP ETF the New Stock Market Rockstar? Find Out Why Everyone’s Obsessed!
- 10 X-Men Batman Could Beat (Ranked By How Hard It’d Be)
- Ashes of Creation Rogue Guide for Beginners
- Kylie Jenner Makes Acting Debut in Charli XCX’s The Moment Trailer
- Cult Horror With 92% On Rotten Tomatoes Quietly Added To Netflix (& I Guarantee You’ve Seen Nothing Like It)
- Liquid Swords announces ‘consequence-heavy noir action game’ Samson: A Tyndalston Story for PC
2026-02-07 18:45