Justin Baldoni Responds to Isabela Ferrer’s Bullying Claim

by

Justin Baldoni is rebuking Isabela Ferrer‘s claims.

After the actress who starred in “It Ends With Us” accused the film director of harassment and dragging her into legal conflicts that she had tried to steer clear of, Baldoni’s representatives strongly criticized the court submission made on August 17th.

In response to Isabela Ferrer’s objection against the Wayfarer Parties’ proposal to serve her by alternative methods, as stated in the August 18th letter from Baldoni’s legal team to Judge Lewis J. Liman (confirmed by TopMob News), the opposition is mainly an unsuitable assault on Mr. Baldoni and his legal representatives. It has no bearing on whether Ms. Ferrer can be served through alternative service methods instead.

The filing stated that Ferrer, who portrayed a younger version of Lily Bloom (previously played by Blake Lively) in the adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s work, received the “service of the Subpoena” through her lawyer Sanford Michelman on her behalf, following Lively’s issuance of one in February 2025 during her ongoing legal dispute with Baldoni.

In July 2025, a court order (subpoena) was issued by the Wayfarer Parties to Ms. Ferrer, demanding documents that she had failed to provide or were not specifically required by Ms. Lively’s subpoena. As stated in the letter, the Wayfarer Parties also attempted to serve their Subpoena twice to Mr. Michelman.

Mr. Michelman chose not to respond to the requests made by the Wayfarer Parties. Instead, he took steps to oppose their motion for an alternative method of service, without providing any reasons for his decision to reject their subpoena or why his client is reluctant to provide testimony.

In simpler terms, Baldoni’s lawyers claimed that Ferrer’s lawyer advised them they should have contacted Ferrer’s talent agent instead of communicating directly about the subpoena. However, their letter stated that they believed it was more suitable to communicate with Ferrer’s lawyer rather than her talent agent regarding the subpoena.

Following their assertion that it was Lively’s group who initially issued the subpoena towards the 24-year-old, they contended that the Gossip Girl star “should not be allowed to acquire evidence from Ms. Ferrer, while Ms. Ferrer and her legal team continue to block all attempts by the Wayfarer Parties to obtain the crucial evidence necessary for their defense preparation.

As a trusted lifestyle advisor, I find myself frequently advocating for respectful and considerate communication. In this particular case, Baldoni’s legal team has made it clear that under the current circumstances, they are open to agreeing that none of us will employ any form of communication related to Ms. Ferrer, nor rely on her testimony in any way or manner whatsoever.

TopMob News has reached out to reps for Lively and Ferrer for comment and has not yet heard back.

According to TopMob News’ report on Ferrer’s stance against being served by alternative means, her lawyer claimed that Baldoni, who is being sued by Lively for sexual harassment, and his colleagues behaved in an unprofessional manner towards Ferrer following her receipt of a subpoena from Lively.

Her argument in counseling stated that the motion filed by Baldoni on August 12 should be rejected, as it had been presented without carrying out the required effort to substantiate a request for permission to deliver a discovery subpoena to Ms. Ferrer through methods other than direct service.

As a lifestyle advisor, I’d like to clarify a point brought up in recent discussions. In this case, it was stated that my team and I failed to actively seek out the accurate residential or professional address of an individual, Ms. Ferrer. This is a point I’d like to address openly.

According to Ferrer’s attorney, after Ferrer requested that Baldoni’s Wayfarer Studios cover her legal expenses as per their film contract, she was informed by the company that they would only compensate her if she handed over control of her response to the Lively subpoena to Wayfarer first.

According to her legal team’s court filings, from then onward, Baldoni reportedly attempted to exert manipulation, threats, and control over Ms. Ferrer, as well as engaging in other unacceptable behaviors towards her. This behavior, they claim, was a response to her refusal to comply with the terms proposed by his team following their disagreement. In simpler terms, Baldoni allegedly harassed her after she did not agree with his team’s demands.

Keep reading for Lively and Baldoni’s lengthy legal battle.

Four months following the cinema release of the film adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s book “It Ends With Us,” Blake Lively submitted a complaint to the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) on December 20, as reported by The New York Times. In the complaint acquired by TopMob News, Justin Baldoni, his production company Wayfarer Studios, its CEO Jamey Heath, cofounder Steve Sarowitz, Baldoni’s publicist Jennifer Abel, her company RWA Communications, crisis communications specialist Melissa Nathan, her company The Agency Group PR LLC (TAG), contractor Jed Wallace, and his company Street Relations Inc. were named as defendants.

Lively claimed in the complaint that Baldoni and his Wayfarer associates initiated a complex media and digital strategy in retaliation for her expressing concerns about alleged misconduct on set. She asserted that she and other cast and crew members endured intrusive, unwelcome, unprofessional, and sexually inappropriate behavior by Baldoni and Heath.

The actress further stated that the alleged campaign against her resulted in significant damage to both her personal and professional life. The accusations detailed in the complaint include sexual harassment; retaliation; failure to investigate, prevent, or rectify harassment; aiding and abetting harassment and retaliation; breach of contract; intentional infliction of emotional distress; negligence; false light invasion of privacy; and interference with prospective economic advantage.

The following day, The New York Times released a report detailing accusations of a retaliatory smear campaign led by Baldoni and his colleagues against Lively. The report referenced her CRD complaint, featuring messages from Baldoni, publicist Abel, crisis communications specialist Nathan, and others involved in the complaint. The newspaper’s article also provided access to related court documents on their website. Speaking with the outlet, Lively expressed hope that her legal action would shed light on these underhanded tactics used to harm individuals who speak out against misconduct and offer protection for those potentially targeted in the future.

Upon hearing about Lively’s accusations, as a dedicated supporter of Baldoni, Wayfarer, and their representatives, I-Bryan Freedman-vehemently denounced her allegations. It’s disgraceful that Lively and her team would make such grave and undeniably false claims against Mr. Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios, and their associates, in a desperate attempt to salvage her tarnished reputation, which was earned through her own remarks and actions during the film campaign; interviews and press activities that were publicly observed, unedited, and allowed for open commentary and critique on the internet. These assertions are entirely fabricated, reckless, intentionally scandalous, and aimed at causing public harm while reviving a sensational narrative in the media.

I also defended Wayfarer’s choice to hire a crisis manager, explaining that this was done prior to the movie’s marketing campaign. Furthermore, I later clarified that Wayfarer’s representatives did not take any proactive measures nor retaliate against these claims; instead, they only responded to incoming media inquiries to ensure balanced and accurate reporting and monitored social activity. What is notably absent from the selectively presented correspondence is evidence of a lack of proactive measures taken with media or otherwise; all that can be seen are internal strategy sessions and private discussions among public relations professionals, which is standard practice within our industry.

After the publication of an article in The New York Times on December 21, the talent agency William Morris Endeavor (WME) ended its relationship with Baldoni. Ari Emanuel, CEO of WME’s parent company Endeavor, confirmed this to the outlet. However, it’s important to note that WME denies that Ryan Reynolds, Lively’s husband and a client of WME, was responsible for their separation from Baldoni. This claim was made by Baldoni in his subsequent lawsuit against The New York Times. In response to these allegations, WME stated to The Hollywood Reporter on January 1 that the claim about Reynolds pressuring Baldoni’s agent at the Deadpool & Wolverine premiere is untrue. They also added that Baldoni’s former representative was not present at the Deadpool & Wolverine premiere, and there was never any pressure from Reynolds or Lively to drop Baldoni as a client at any time.

After Lively’s CRD filing and an article in The New York Times, several well-known personalities expressed their support for Lively’s allegations against Baldoni. For instance, the author of It Ends With Us, Colleen Hoover, posted a message on Instagram Stories on December 21, praising Lively for her honesty, kindness, and patience.

Similarly, Jenny Slate, who portrayed the sister of Baldoni’s character Ryle, also voiced her support for Lively in a statement to Today on December 23.

Brandon Sklenar, a love interest for Lively’s character Lily Bloom, shared a link to the complaint published on The New York Times’ website and urged people to read it.

Lastly, Lively’s Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants costars-America Ferrera, Alexis Bledel, and Amber Tamblyn-publicly declared their solidarity with her.

Liz Plank recently announced her decision to step down as co-host of The Man Enough Podcast, which she shared with Baldoni and Heath. She made this announcement on Instagram on December 23rd, stating that she would no longer be a part of the show. In her message, she expressed gratitude for the trust her listeners placed in her, for the connections they forged, and for the community they built together. However, she did not provide a reason for her departure from the podcast.

It’s worth noting that Plank’s exit came shortly after Emily Lively’s complaint against Baldoni and his associates at Wayfarer, though it’s unclear whether the two events are related. In her message to followers, Plank reaffirmed her commitment to the values they had built together and thanked them for their support over the past four years. She also mentioned that she would have more to share soon as she worked through the recent developments. Finally, she expressed a continued commitment to supporting those who speak out against injustice and holding accountable those who stand in their way.

In a lawsuit filed against him, his company, and several others on December 24th in New York, Baldoni’s former publicist Stephanie Jones and her agency, Jonesworks LLC, have accused him of conspiring with his current publicist Abel and crisis communications specialist Nathan to publicly and privately attack Jones and her agency for months. The lawsuit also alleges that they breached contracts, stole clients, and orchestrated a smear campaign against Baldoni’s film co-star, all while hiding their actions from Jones.

According to Abel’s LinkedIn profile, she worked at Jonesworks until last summer. The lawsuit claims that Abel and Nathan are now falsely accusing Jones as their misconduct is exposed, defaming and attacking her in the industry.

Baldoni and Wayfarer, who are no longer clients of Jonesworks, are accused in the suit of breaking their contractual obligations with Jonesworks and refusing to settle the dispute privately through arbitration.

TopMob News reached out to the defendants for comment.

As a devoted follower, I’d like to share that in a recent article published by Variety on December 23rd, it was revealed that my lawyers obtained the texts highlighted in The New York Times piece through a subpoena issued to Jonesworks. Freedman, who represents both Nathan, Abel, and Baldoni, along with his associates at Wayfarer, clarified to the outlet that none of his clients were served subpoenas on this matter. He further mentioned his intention to sue Jones for disclosing messages from Abel’s phone to my lawyers.

Baldoni, Wayfarer, Heath, Sarowitz, Nathan, TAG, Abel, RWA Communications, Wallace and Street Relations filed a $250 million lawsuit against The New York Times Dec. 31.

In the suit obtained by TopMob, The New York Times was accused of libel, false light invasion of privacy, promissory fraud and breach of implied-in-fact contract for its article about a retaliatory smear campaign the plaintiffs allegedly conducted against Lively after she voiced concerns about purported misconduct on set.

Saying the report was “false” and based on Lively’s CRD complaint, the plaintiffs denied the accusations and alleged messages cited in the article and complaint were taken out of context.

“Despite its claim to have ‘reviewed these along with other documents[,]’ the Times relied almost entirely on Lively’s unverified and self-serving narrative,” the lawsuit said, “lifting it nearly verbatim while disregarding an abundance of evidence that contradicted her claims and exposed her true motives.”

They alleged “it was Lively, not Plaintiffs, who engaged in a calculated smear campaign.” She denied this.

The New York Times said it planned to “vigorously defend against the lawsuit.”

“The role of an independent news organization is to follow the facts where they lead,” it stated to TopMob. “Our story was meticulously and responsibly reported. It was based on a review of thousands of pages of original documents, including the text messages and emails that we quote accurately and at length in the article.”

On that very day, I chose to take legal action against Baldoni, Heath, Sarowitz, It Ends With Us Movie LLC, Nathan, TAG, and Abel in New York City. As outlined in court documents obtained by TopMob News, my lawsuit accuses the defendants of various offenses including sexual harassment, retaliation, negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false light invasion of privacy, among others.

These allegations were initially detailed in the CRD complaint I filed earlier that month. Regarding the lawsuit Baldoni and his associates filed against The New York Times, which did not include me as a defendant, my legal team stated to TopMob that this lawsuit does not alter the claims made in my initial CRD and federal complaints.

My lawyers further clarified that the premise of the lawsuit suggesting I had no intention of filing a lawsuit against Baldoni and Wayfarer is false, as evidenced by the federal complaint I filed today.

In the legal action brought by Baldoni and his companions against The New York Times, the plaintiffs conveyed that their actions are far from over. According to court documents, there are more wrongdoers involved, and it’s important to note that this won’t be the final lawsuit they file.

In a January 2 interview with NBC News, Baldoni’s attorney Freedman affirmed that they indeed intend to instigate legal action against Lively as well.

The discussion about Baldoni and Lively didn’t end with just the headlines. For example, some social media users suspected that Reynolds, Lively’s husband, made fun of Baldoni in his film “Deadpool & Wolverine” through the character Nicepool.

Reynolds has not spoken publicly about these rumors, but Baldoni’s lawyer, Freedman, did share his thoughts. During an interview on The Megyn Kelly Show (available on YouTube as of Jan 7), Freedman stated: “In my opinion, if your wife is sexually harassed, you don’t make light of Justin Baldoni’s situation. You treat it seriously. You file complaints through HR, raise the issue, and follow legal procedures. What you don’t do is joke about it or mock the person.

In their statement, Lively’s legal team explained that the case against Wayfarer in the Southern District of New York concerns substantial accusations of sexual harassment and retaliation. They emphasized that this is not a petty disagreement or he-said-she-said situation, but rather a matter of unlawful retaliation by Wayfarer and their associates against Lively for attempting to ensure safety on the film set. Furthermore, they stated that since the lawsuit was filed, there have been further attempts to attack Lively.

They urged everyone to remember that sexual harassment and retaliation are illegal in all workplaces and industries. They warned against deflecting from such misconduct allegations by blaming the victim or portraying the offender as the victim instead. They also highlighted that media statements do not serve as a defense for the claims made by Lively, and that they will be presenting their case in court.

As a lifestyle expert, I’d rephrase it like this: In response, Justin Baldoni’s legal representative, Freedman, shared with TopMob an interesting perspective. “It’s ironic indeed that Blake Lively is alleging Justin of manipulating the media when her own team preemptively distributed doctored documents to the New York Times before even submitting the complaint.” He further stated, “We will unveil all the evidence that demonstrates a recurring pattern of intimidation and threats aimed at controlling the film. This won’t be unexpected given Blake Lively’s history of leveraging others to send threats and bully her way to get what she desired. We have solid proof and much more to back this up.

As an ardent fan, I’m compelled to share some exciting news – Heath Baldoni, Wayfarer, Abel the publicist, Nathan the crisis communication specialist, and It Ends With Us Movie LLC have filed a lawsuit against Blake Lively, her publicist Leslie Sloane, Sloane’s firm Vision PR, Ryan Reynolds, and others in New York on January 16th.

According to the suit obtained by TopMob News, we, the plaintiffs, are accusing all defendants of civil extortion, defamation, false light invasion of privacy, breach of good faith, interference with contracts, and negligent interference with prospective economic advantage. We vehemently deny Lively’s allegations of sexual harassment and a smear campaign against us.

Instead, we accuse her of seizing control over It Ends With Us, collaborating with Reynolds, Sloane, Jones, and others to tarnish our reputation in the press after she faced backlash for marketing the film. However, Lively claims she promoted the movie according to Sony’s marketing plan.

In the lawsuit, we allege that the defendants conspired with The New York Times to publish a false and damaging report. Although the outlet has stood by its report, we believe Lively was either misled or intentionally deceived.

Part of our statement to TopMob reads: “Blake Lively was either severely misled by her team or intentionally and knowingly misrepresented the truth.

As an ardent fan, I’ve found myself deeply disturbed by the recent turn of events unfolding between my beloved star, Ava Lively, and her alleged abuser, Baldoni. In a statement to TopMob News, her legal team has branded this lawsuit as “just another chapter in the abuser playbook.” They further explained that it’s an age-old tactic: when a woman speaks up with solid evidence of sexual harassment and retaliation, the alleged abuser tries to reverse the roles of the victim and offender. This is what experts refer to as DARVO – Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim Offender.

They also accused Baldoni of retaliating against her once she made allegations, claiming that he’s trying to mislead people into believing Lively seized creative control and estranged the cast from him instead. The team is confident that evidence will prove otherwise. They asserted that the cast and others had their own negative experiences with Baldoni and Wayfarer. Furthermore, they stated that Sony asked Lively to oversee their cut of the film, which was then chosen for distribution and became a massive success.

To add fuel to the fire, her lawyers slammed Baldoni’s response to Lively’s harassment allegations. They argued that his defense is classic – “she wanted it, it’s her fault.” Moreover, they justified his actions by blaming Lively’s attire. In essence, while the victim concentrates on the abuse, the abuser focuses on the victim. This desperate attempt to attack Lively will not refute the evidence in her complaint and will ultimately fail.

As a dedicated follower, I’d like to share an update about the behind-the-scenes footage from ‘It Ends With Us.’ My legal team released this footage, stating that it contradicts the characterization made by Ms. Lively about me. They explained that the scene in question was intended to portray our characters falling in love and yearning for closeness, with both actors maintaining professionalism and mutual respect throughout.

However, Ms. Lively’s legal team argues that this footage supports her claims in the lawsuit, stating that every moment was improvised by me without prior discussion or consent. They shared that the video shows Ms. Lively leaning away and repeatedly asking for our characters to just talk. According to them, any woman who has experienced inappropriate workplace touching can relate to Ms. Lively’s discomfort.

In simpler terms, they wrote a letter to the judge managing their case, asking him to restrict Freedman, the lead attorney for Baldoni, from making any public comments during the ongoing court proceedings to prevent inappropriate behavior.

A recently leaked seven-minute voice note by Baldoni reportedly sent to Lively during the filming of “It Ends With Us” revealed some interesting insights. The note suggested that Baldoni referenced the movie’s rooftop scene, which Lively had rewritten, and how this change was discussed during an alleged meeting with Reynolds and their mutual friend Taylor Swift.

Baldoni expressed his admiration for Lively in the recording, stating, “It’s amazing to have friends like you, especially since you’re two of the most creative people out there.” He further added, “The three of you together is simply incredible.”

In the note, Baldoni also appeared to apologize to Lively for his initial tepid response to her script, saying, “I made a mistake. One thing you should know about me is that I will own up to my mistakes and apologize when needed.

Exactly one month following when Lively initiated a legal action against Baldoni, a court hearing was scheduled for March 9, 2026.

According to TopMob News’ obtained documents, Baldoni’s team updated their January 16 response against Lively, Reynolds, Sloane, and Vision PR Inc. in the U.S. District Court by adding The New York Times. In the revised claim, Baldoni accused Lively and her associates of colluding for months and spreading false information to The New York Times. The filing asserts that the newspaper selectively chose and manipulated communications without proper context and intentionally edited them to deceive.

Baldoni unveiled a website detailing his legal dispute with Lively, featuring his revised court complaint and a chronology of significant events related to the case. This timeline reportedly included supposed screenshots of text conversations between Lively, Reynolds, and Baldoni.

The website’s debut occurred a month following Freedman’s statement that they intended to disclose “every single text message” between the two parties.

“We aim for transparency,” said Baldoni’s attorney during an interview with NBC News on January 2nd. “We want the evidence to be accessible. We want people to form their own opinions based on the facts.

Originally, Lively’s lawyers filed an updated lawsuit, asserting that two additional female colleagues who worked on the film ‘It Ends With Us’ had privately expressed discomfort due to Baldoni’s conduct on set. The revised complaint, obtained by TopMob News, stated that Lively was not the only one expressing concerns about Baldoni. Their experiences were recorded back in May 2023, and notably, contrary to the version of events that the defendants have constructed, Baldoni acknowledged the complaints in writing at the time. He understood that other women, aside from Lively, had also expressed discomfort and voiced their concerns about his behavior.

The updated complaint did not reveal the identities of the two supporting witnesses, as Lively explained they would testify due to a hostile environment created by the defendants’ retaliation campaign, characterized by threats, harassment, and intimidation.

In response, Freedman issued a statement to TopMob, claiming that the lawsuit contained “unsubstantiated hearsay,” and suggested that the unnamed individuals were no longer willing to corroborate Lively’s allegations or support her publicly.

Following Baldoni’s claims that Sloane was spreading harmful tales that painted him as a sexual offender and executing a defamatory campaign at Lively’s behest, Sloane submitted a motion to withdraw from the ongoing legal case.

According to documents acquired by TopMob News, Sloane’s legal representative contended that there was no solid grounds for the allegations against Sloane and claimed she was unfairly involved in the lawsuit as a tactic to divert attention away from Lively’s claims, serving as a smokescreen.

Nick Shapiro, a previous Deputy Chief of Staff at the CIA, was recruited by Lively to provide legal communication advice for handling an ongoing sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit in the Southern District of New York, as reported by a member of her litigation team at Willkie Farr & Gallagher to Variety on February 28.

Shapiro, who served for CIA from 2013 to 2015 during Obama’s administration, subsequently held positions as Visa’s vice president of worldwide security and communications and Airbnb’s global crisis management leader. Following a three-year stint at the rental firm, he established his own consulting company, 10th Avenue Consulting LLC.

The New York Times requested to be removed from a $400 million legal case, which additionally involves Lively, Baldoni, Sloane, and Sloane’s business, according to documents acquired by TopMob News.

As a dedicated follower, I’d like to share that in legal filings, it was emphasized that my team’s story has been making headlines, but some might say it’s one-sided. However, it’s crucial to note that I don’t believe The New York Times should be involved in this dispute.

Additionally, you may recall that the initial $250 million lawsuit I and my associates at Wayfarer initiated against The New York Times was dismissed. This dismissal occurred after The New York Times became a part of the subsequent $400 million lawsuit, as reported by Deadline upon obtaining relevant court documents.

After The New York Times requested dismissal, Judge Lewis J. Liman approved a temporary halt on the exchange of information or documents between parties, as detailed by TopMob News’ obtained documents. This filing asked for a temporary pause in the sharing of information, pending the judge’s review of The New York Times’ February 28 motion.

Judge Liman’s March 4 document stated that The New York Times presented significant reasons and demonstrated a high likelihood that their dismissal motion would be successful. He also mentioned that Baldoni’s team would not face unfair prejudice due to the stay while the court considers the pending motion.

In response, a spokesperson for The New York Times told TopMob News, “We’re grateful for today’s court decision, which underscores the significance of First Amendment principles at play here. The court has decided to halt Mr. Baldoni from imposing discovery requests on The Times in a case that should not have been initiated against us.

As a devoted admirer, I can’t help but share my thoughts on the recent buzz. When Baldoni alleged that Lively was exploiting her friendship with Swift to gain more creative control over It Ends With Us, his legal team even went as far as seeking a subpoena for the singer. However, Swift’s representative wasn’t about to let this slide and swiftly responded!

In simpler terms, the representative confirmed to TopMob News on May 9 that Taylor Swift has not been part of this movie’s production process. She didn’t take part in casting decisions, didn’t compose the music, and hasn’t even watched an edited version or provided feedback on it.

The representative stated that Taylor Swift had a connection to the movie primarily due to allowing one of her songs, ‘My Tears Ricochet,’ to be featured. They explained that since 19 other artists also licensed their songs for the film, the subpoena seeking Taylor’s involvement appears intended to generate public interest using sensational headlines rather than focusing on the actual details of the case.

Baldoni’s attorneys withdrew their request later that month, per Lively’s legal team.

In a ruling, the judge dismissed the countersuit aimed at Lively, Reynolds, their publicist Sloane, Sloan’s company Vision PR, and The New York Times. This dismissal occurred because Baldoni and his legal team were unable to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims of defamation or civil extortion.

On Instagram Stories, Lively expressed her feelings about facing a reprisal lawsuit, which not only caused legal distress but also attempted to instill an unwarranted sense of embarrassment. She added that while her case was ultimately dismissed, she acknowledged that many others lack the necessary means to counter such lawsuits.

She expressed, ‘I express my love and gratitude towards those who have supported me. While I may know some of you, there are many more that I do not, but rest assured, I will always cherish and advocate for each one of you.’

Instead, Baldoni’s lawyer informed TopMob News in a statement that Lively’s claim of victory was actually misleading.

Baldoni’s legal representative communicated to TopMob News through a statement that Lively’s declaration of winning was, in fact, not accurate.

The attorney stated that the matter at hand involves unfounded allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation, along with an alleged smear campaign, which Miss Lively’s own team deems ‘untraceable’ since they can’t substantiate something that didn’t occur in the first place.

After sitting for a legal interview at her lawyers’ office in New York, Lively was reported to have engaged in a confrontation with Baldoni. However, her attorneys later disputed this portrayal, stating that there was no need for her to be accompanied by a large group of people while testifying.

As per Lively’s argument, it was stated that Baldoni was present in the room with the other defendants mentioned in her lawsuit, along with each defendant’s legal representative.

Read More

2025-08-19 20:18