
Even though Battlefield 6 just came out, EA and Battlefield Studios are already releasing a much-talked-about battle royale mode called Battlefield Redsec. It combines the classic Battlefield gameplay with features popular in other battle royale games. I was excited to try it, even though I don’t usually play shooter games. However, I was disappointed to find out it didn’t have a solo mode. It seemed unbelievable that one of the year’s biggest first-person shooter releases would leave out something so many players, including myself, expect as standard.
The choice to only offer Duos and Squads at the game’s launch, and not include a solo queue, is puzzling. It makes you wonder about the game’s overall design and how it caters to different types of players. Why leave out those who prefer to play alone? Electronic Arts and DICE haven’t said if solo play will be added later, and players – including myself – are voicing their disappointment.
Battlefield 6’s New Battle Royale Rules—Unless You’re Alone

I’ve had a lot of fun playing Battlefield Redsec. I especially love Gauntlet – the changing obstacles and round-based matches are really engaging. I’ve also enjoyed playing with teams of two or four, but it’s best when I can play with friends. Teamwork is crucial to win in Battlefield 6’s battle royale, and it’s hard to succeed with players I don’t know. The battle royale gameplay is great – it feels as good as the regular multiplayer – but I really wish there was an option to play solo.
I usually like to play games by myself, not because I don’t enjoy playing with others, but it’s just difficult to find a time when everyone is available to play as a team. People are busy these days, and playing solo is often the easiest solution. Unfortunately, Battlefield Redsec doesn’t have a solo mode, so I end up playing with random players and hoping we can work together well enough to win.
Playing in pairs or squads in Battlefield 6 really demands teamwork, especially with how the game is designed. I’ve lost matches because my teammates didn’t stick together or focus on what needed to be done. When you’re on your own against a well-coordinated four-player squad, it’s nearly impossible to win. It’s frustrating enough that I’m considering stopping playing until the developers add a solo mode.
Battlefield 6 Needs to Add Solo Play to Battle Royale, and Fast

Making it possible to play alone (solo queue) should be a major focus for both business and design teams. It would attract more players, as not everyone has friends to play with or the ability to schedule regular team sessions. Personally, I often don’t play when solo options aren’t available – I prefer not to depend on others. Giving players the chance to play alone, especially when they’re looking to relax after a busy day, is really important. Facing teams of coordinated players when you’re playing by yourself just isn’t fun.
Battlefield has always encouraged players to work together, but usually in classic multiplayer modes where teamwork feels natural. This is different from battle royale games, where players expect to be able to rely on their own skills. If Battlefield doesn’t quickly add a team-focused mode, many players – including me – might stop playing the current battle royale mode altogether.
Launching without a solo mode feels like a misstep for battle royale games, which are usually all about letting players play how they want. Games like Fortnite have very popular and well-designed solo modes. Call of Duty, Battlefield’s main competitor, has experimented with solo play in Warzone and seen positive results. With Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 coming out this year, the developers of Battlefield Redsec need to act quickly to gain an advantage.
Why Solo Mode Is Important and How Battlefield Can Make It Work

Why is a solo mode so important in a team-focused game like Battlefield 6? It’s about more than just personal preference – it’s about how you want to experience the game. A solo mode gives you control. You decide how fast or slow to play, what tactics to use, and when to fight. You don’t have to depend on teammates who might not cooperate or communicate. I personally prefer solo play in battle royales because I like being fully in charge of my success or failure.
It’s understandable why Battlefield Studios is cautious about adding a single-player mode. The way the game is designed right now doesn’t really lend itself to solo play. The class system is built around teamwork, where players complement each other’s skills and bring different strengths to battles. Plus, the game’s item drops are tied to your chosen class – like Recon players finding sniper rifles and Support players getting light machine guns. If the game had a solo mode, everyone might just pick the Assault class for extra firepower, similar to what happened during testing for the game Marathon, where players all chose the invisible character. Luckily, these problems could be fixed with a few adjustments.
First, we need to eliminate classes, letting players freely choose any perk, trait, piece of gear, or weapon they find. This will give them the flexibility to customize their equipment during gameplay, instead of being restricted to a single class build. Second, we can improve the game’s flow by adjusting how often and where vehicles appear. Currently, encountering a tank without the right equipment usually means instant defeat, but we can reduce vehicle spawns and provide players with more ways to take them out.
Ultimately, these changes can motivate players to be more daring. Rewarding risky plays – like getting kills, achieving high rankings, or using smart tactics – with extra experience or in-game currency creates exciting opportunities. Allowing players to destroy the environment is a simple way to push them away from cautious, stealthy approaches and instead encourage more active engagement. This also adds new strategic options. I think incorporating the dynamic objectives from the Gauntlet mode into solo play would be great, as it would further promote player-versus-player combat.
The biggest disappointment with Battlefield 6’s battle royale is that it shows so much promise. The core gameplay is excellent – it feels smooth and responsive, and the destructible environments are a great addition. It really looks impressive. However, by not including a solo play option, the developers have unfortunately hindered what could have been a truly groundbreaking release.
What do you think? Leave a comment below and join the conversation now in the ComicBook Forum!
Read More
- Steam RPG From 2023 Being Removed Next Month and PC Users Aren’t Happy: “Huge Potential Wasted”
- Yakuza Maker’s Next PS5 Game Gets a Brief Behind-the-Scenes Video
- Deadlock The Doorman Guide: Big Tips & Tricks
- Kunitsu-Gami: Path of the Goddess ‘Mazo Talisman: Yashichi Waves’ update launches in July
- ‘My Name Is Jeff’: Channing Tatum Played Another Jeff In Roofman, And Is Considering Legally Changing His Name
- ‘LEGO Batman: Legacy of the Dark Knight’ Reveals Its 7 Main Batsuits
- Alabaster Dawn Demo is Now Available on PC
- Gears of War: Reloaded is Now Available
- Preview: Teamwork Is the True Terror of Little Nightmares 3
- No Upgrade Path for the Belated PS5 Version of Yakuza 0 Director’s Cut
2025-10-28 23:12