Released in 1985, Back to the Future launched Michael J. Fox (fresh off his success with Family Ties) into movie stardom and established director Robert Zemeckis as a master of action and comedy. Zemeckis had already demonstrated this skill with Romancing the Stone, but Back to the Future truly cemented his reputation for blending genres and creating broadly appealing films. Despite the return of the director and most of the original cast, the two sequels didn’t quite live up to the original’s success.
While the sequels, Back to the Future Part II and Back to the Future Part III, aren’t bad movies, they definitely don’t capture the same energy and excitement as the first Back to the Future. Let’s take a closer look at how they compare.
3) Back to the Future Part II
Although it’s fun to watch Back to the Future Part II and see how wrong its predictions about 2015 were, it’s the slowest-paced movie in the trilogy. Still, it’s a significant film because it and its follow-up were among the first to be filmed consecutively. Notably, the future version of the villain Biff Tannen seems heavily inspired by a real-life businessman who later became a controversial public figure – someone many people either loved or hated.
One problem with the two sequels is that they largely retread the same ground as the original movie. While this does create a connection to the 1985 film, it also makes them feel uninspired. Especially in Part II, the sequels often just replay familiar scenes without adding much depth, aside from shifting the setting to the future. If you liked seeing Biff and his crew pursue Marty McFly in the 80s, you’ll find a similarly silly chase sequence in the year 2015, though this time Marty’s on a hoverboard.
2) Back to the Future Part III
While Back to the Future Part III shares some of the same problems as its predecessor, it handles them more effectively. The film further proves how valuable Thomas F. Wilson was to the series. As Buford “Mad Dog” Tannen, he delivers the trilogy’s most threatening villain, creating a similar sense of urgency to the original – the stakes are high, and Marty’s very existence is on the line.
Okay, look, I’m a huge Back to the Future fan, and I always thought Part III was a little underrated. But honestly, the thing that really elevates it over Part II for me is Mary Steenburgen. She was exactly what that movie needed! Her performance as Clara Clayton was just so charming and sweet, and it gave Doc Brown a chance to really develop as a person. It’s a perfect addition to the whole story, in my opinion.
1) Back to the Future
It’s hard to say anything new about Back to the Future – it’s one of the most iconic movies of the 1980s, and everything has pretty much already been said. It’s a rare film where all the elements – the story, acting, directing, and music – came together perfectly.
This movie expertly balances thrilling situations with a fun, upbeat feel, and the actors have fantastic chemistry. Unlike some films that depend solely on their stars, this one has a strong story too. Like classics such as Gremlins and E.T., Back to the Future is a must-see for everyone when they’re young, but it’s just as enjoyable as an adult. It truly is a magical movie experience.
Read More
- Kunitsu-Gami: Path of the Goddess ‘Mazo Talisman: Yashichi Waves’ update launches in July
- Deadlock The Doorman Guide: Big Tips & Tricks
- Steam RPG From 2023 Being Removed Next Month and PC Users Aren’t Happy: “Huge Potential Wasted”
- Alabaster Dawn Demo is Now Available on PC
- ‘LEGO Batman: Legacy of the Dark Knight’ Reveals Its 7 Main Batsuits
- ‘My Name Is Jeff’: Channing Tatum Played Another Jeff In Roofman, And Is Considering Legally Changing His Name
- Yakuza Maker’s Next PS5 Game Gets a Brief Behind-the-Scenes Video
- Gears of War: Reloaded is Now Available
- Preview: Teamwork Is the True Terror of Little Nightmares 3
- No Upgrade Path for the Belated PS5 Version of Yakuza 0 Director’s Cut
2025-11-03 00:45