The huge popularity of the Harry Potter books and films inspired many similar stories, and a few were quite successful. When the Harry Potter movies finished, Hollywood had several options for new franchises. One book series seemed particularly promising, and filmmakers quickly decided to shoot the adaptation in Ireland.
Eoin Colfer’s Artemis Fowl, first published in 2001—four years after Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone—shared a similar premise: a young boy drawn into a hidden world of magic and mythical beings. However, Artemis Fowl quickly distinguished itself. Unlike other books trying to capitalize on Harry Potter‘s success, it featured a protagonist with a strong sense of intelligence, clever detective skills reminiscent of Sherlock Holmes, and a flair for high-tech gadgets, similar to James Bond.
The Artemis Fowl Books Were Perfect For Movie Adaptations
Eoin Colfer’s Artemis Fowl books always seemed perfect for a movie. The stories are big and visually exciting, with fantastic settings and action sequences that practically begged to be brought to life on screen.
Artemis Fowl was the opposite of a typical hero. Instead of being kind and considerate, he was known for his sharp wit and tendency to insult anyone he considered less intelligent. While he ultimately did the right thing when necessary, his inclination towards crime and disregard for traditional morality made him a compelling character.
While few young adult novels create fantasy worlds as immersive as Harry Potter, Artemis Fowl came remarkably close. The book developed a complete and fascinating underground world of People, complete with futuristic technology and a highly-trained police force. This richly imagined universe had everything needed for a successful live-action adaptation – depth, scope, imagination, and, above all, a lot of entertainment value.
As a movie reviewer, I always thought an Artemis Fowl franchise could have really taken off – there were eight books to work with! What I appreciated about the series, and what a film adaptation could have captured, is that it consistently struck a great balance between thrilling danger and playful fun. Unlike Harry Potter, which shifted from lighthearted adventures to increasingly complex and dark storylines, Artemis Fowl pretty much maintained that same exciting energy throughout the books. It knew what it was, and it stuck with it, which is something I think audiences would have responded to.
Colfer’s books weren’t formulaic. Each new installment felt like a natural progression, with Artemis slowly growing up, impactful character deaths, and thoughtful observations about the world – though they never reached the same level of darkness as the later Harry Potter books.
The Artemis Fowl Movie Was Such A Disappointment
As a huge fan of the books, it really wasn’t surprising to me that people started talking about making an Artemis Fowl movie almost as soon as the first one came out. Honestly, if things had worked out differently, I always imagined Artemis could have been a major blockbuster, competing with Harry Potter instead of coming along years later. It felt like a missed opportunity!
The project stalled, and it took over ten years for Disney to revisit the idea, this time with Kenneth Branagh directing. Even with a strong story and a popular director, the film adaptation of Artemis Fowl faced numerous problems.
The problems with Artemis Fowl aren’t due to the actors’ performances. Ferdia Shaw and Lara McDonnell, both young performers, were surprisingly good, and Judi Dench delivered exactly the kind of strong performance everyone expects from her.
I was really hoping the Artemis Fowl movie would capture everything I loved about the books, but honestly, it only hit the main points. You could tell who the characters were and the story came from Eoin Colfer’s writing, and they used the same fairy world terms, which was good. But it just felt…flat. All the little details that made the books so special – the funny dialogue, the way the Lower Elements felt like a real place with its own culture – that was all missing. It just didn’t quite feel right.
Honestly, the biggest disappointment with Disney’s Artemis Fowl movie was how bland it was. In the books, Artemis wasn’t a good guy, exactly, but he was clever and had this really cool, calculating side. He wasn’t afraid to be a bit of a jerk, which made him interesting! The movie just…smoothed all of that out. It turned him into just another typical young hero, and it totally lost what made the character special.
The movie also moved away from what made the books special in terms of its story. It combined parts of the first two Artemis Fowl novels and added a new plot device called the “Aculos.” Instead of being a unique fantasy heist film based on the first book, Artemis Fowl ended up feeling like many other young adult adventure movies made recently.
The movie Artemis Fowl was different enough from Harry Potter to potentially become a major family fantasy series. However, by making it too similar, the filmmakers ensured Harry Potter would continue to dominate the genre unchallenged.
Read More
- Hazbin Hotel season 3 release date speculation and latest news
- This 2020 Horror Flop is Becoming a Cult Favorite, Even if it Didn’t Nail the Adaptation
- Where Winds Meet: How To Defeat Shadow Puppeteer (Boss Guide)
- 10 Chilling British Horror Miniseries on Streaming That Will Keep You Up All Night
- Dolly Parton Addresses Missing Hall of Fame Event Amid Health Concerns
- Meet the cast of Mighty Nein: Every Critical Role character explained
- 🤑 Crypto Chaos: UK & US Tango While Memes Mine Gold! 🕺💸
- Jelly Roll’s Wife Bunnie Xo Addresses His Affair Confession
- 5 Perfect Movie Scenes That You Didn’t Realize Had No Music (& Were Better For It)
- You Won’t Believe What Happens to MYX Finance’s Price – Shocking Insights! 😲
2025-11-26 17:31