U.S. Bitcoin ETFs: ‘Good’ for crypto or not? Analyst weighs in

As an analyst with a background in financial regulation and experience in the crypto industry, I believe that while the U.S. Bitcoin ETF approval was a significant step forward for the crypto market, it does not definitively validate crypto legitimacy in the United States.

As a crypto investor, I can’t help but feel a mix of emotions regarding the US spot Bitcoin ETF approval in January. On one hand, I see it as a significant step towards mainstream acceptance and legitimization of cryptocurrencies. However, on the other hand, I also worry that it might attract institutional investors in large numbers, potentially driving up the price and increasing volatility. Ultimately, only time will tell how this development unfolds for the crypto market.

In a recent conversation with Bitcoin Magazine, Neel Maitra, a previous cryptocurrency expert at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), expressed a reluctant view towards the January approval, which may not bode well for the market.

Part of his speech stated,

The approval was reluctant and only applied to Bitcoin, which isn’t a positive sign for the crypto market as a whole.

Maitra referred back to the SEC’s denial of Bitcoin ETF proposals over the past seven years, which he used as evidence to bolster his points, before the courts eventually compelled the SEC to take action.

The regulatory body made it clear that their recent approval for Bitcoin (BTC) investments doesn’t extend to the entire crypto market. This approval is specifically for BTC and should not be interpreted as a blanket approval for all cryptocurrencies.

Divergent views on Bitcoin ETF impact

Despite Franklin Bi, a partner at Pantera Capital, holding a opposing perspective, in an interview with “The Block,” he stated that the approval of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs served as verification for cryptocurrencies.

He further commented,

“People are encouraged by the approval as it indicates that the regulatory landscape for digital assets continues to progress in a favorable manner.”

The executive remarked that the approval served as confirmation for numerous institutional investors that cryptocurrency represents a significant technological development deserving of further investigation.

True to Bi’s word, U.S. spot BTC ETFs have seen massive interest from institutional players.

BlackRock, the foremost global asset manager, made a successful launch of its Bitcoin ETF and is contemplating the digitization of real-life assets using blockchain technology.

Despite the approvals, regulatory scrutiny towards Uniswap (UNI) and Consensys’ MetaMask hasn’t waned. In fact, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken legal action against both entities.

As an analyst, I would rephrase it as follows: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has yet to explicitly define whether Ethereum (ETH) falls outside the definition of a security. This ambiguity led Consensys to file a lawsuit against the SEC, aiming to clarify ETH’s status in the courts.

In an independent turn of events, a class action lawsuit has been filed against Coinbase, alleging that the cryptocurrency exchange deceived investors by selling them “securities” such as Solana (SOL), Near (NEAR), and UNI, among others, without properly disclosing this fact.

After the approval of Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in January, there is now more regulatory certainty for the cryptocurrency. On the other hand, Ethereum (ETH) and various crypto projects and tokens encounter ongoing regulatory uncertainties.

Will it take more than ETF approval to validate crypto legitimacy in the U.S.?

2024-05-06 13:11

Divergent views on Bitcoin ETF impact

Read More