I Still Want to See the Original Version of Jurassic Park III

by

Jurassic Park remains one of the most beloved and influential sci-fi franchises of all time, and it truly changed filmmaking. The newer Jurassic World films, especially the most recent one, have attempted to recapture the magic of the original 90s movies. However, the sequels haven’t quite lived up to the standard set by the first film, and are mostly discussed amongst dedicated fans. Simply put, they lacked the original’s innovative storytelling and compelling writing. While the second and third movies aren’t necessarily bad, they just don’t reach the same heights.

As a fan, I was really disappointed with The Lost World: Jurassic Park and Jurassic Park III. They just didn’t capture the magic of the first movie. Instead of being thrilling and unpredictable, the stories felt really familiar and predictable. One of them felt like it was just repeating the same ideas, and honestly, it was frustrating because I was hoping for something new. The other tried to be a simple dinosaur survival story, but it ended up feeling cheap and didn’t really make much of an impression. It’s a shame, because I heard the original script for Jurassic Park III was actually really promising, and the final movie just didn’t live up to that potential.

The Original Idea for Jurassic Park III Was Much Bolder

I’ve always seen the third movie as simple, disposable entertainment – and that’s all it really is. Because of that, it feels like something’s lacking. It is Jurassic Park, after all – the first film still resonates with audiences today. Even now, whenever a new installment is announced, people get excited. This franchise changed filmmaking, so you expect something truly special. Jurassic Park III had all the potential to be great, but the script was heavily revised, and the final product reflected those changes.

This early version has been online for a while, and fans have often wondered what the final product could have been if the studio had kept it. Simply put, the original concept was much stronger. What we actually saw was only the less compelling part of the story, while the better half was unfortunately cut.

The third Jurassic Park film took the safest approach: paleontologist Alan Grant (Sam Neill) is lured back to Isla Sorna by a couple in need, unknowingly joining a rescue mission. After a plane crash, the group struggles to survive, and the movie features a series of dinosaur encounters leading to a final escape. It’s simple, gets the job done, and has a few enjoyable parts, but it doesn’t really try anything new.

The first draft of the script was a lot more complex. It started with two tourists vanishing off the coast of Costa Rica, which quickly escalated into an international crisis. Dinosaurs would then begin attacking ships and washing up on shores around the region, leading to conflicts between governments and eventually a formal trial held in Costa Rica. Dr. Grant wouldn’t be involved simply as a favor, but because his specialized knowledge was officially required. It was a much more logical storyline, and it would have given the character a strong, clear purpose, making the film far more engaging.

As a fan, it was always clear to me that if dinosaurs existed, they wouldn’t just stay contained forever. The original plan for the third movie was amazing because it dove into all the real-world impacts – the politics, the economy, and the environmental issues. It felt like it could have really broadened the whole Jurassic Park universe, and they even started talking about a fourth movie! I’ve always thought this series is best when it fully embraces how huge the idea of dinosaurs existing actually is. That early script did that perfectly, treating dinosaurs as a worldwide problem, not just something happening in a park. We did eventually see that idea in Jurassic World, but it didn’t feel right – it was introduced as a surprise late in the movie instead of being the core of the story from the beginning.

What I really preferred about the original plan was how Grant was going to be portrayed. In the final movie, he feels like someone who’s just been dragged into a chaotic situation against his will. But the original idea gave him a much more compelling role: he was a key witness in a huge international case, wrestling with a difficult moral choice, and completely devoted to his research – even to the point of living on the island. That would have made him a much more complex and interesting character, explaining why fans loved him so much. I especially miss that sense of moral responsibility he embodied in the earlier concept; the final version just doesn’t have that same dramatic impact.

There were many other changes that would have significantly improved the film, even if they seemed minor on their own. For instance, the fight between the T-Rex and Spinosaurus could have been much longer, the Spinosaurus could have been killed by Velociraptors, and Billy (Alessandro Nivola) could have actually died.

While Jurassic Park III attempts a scary atmosphere, it often feels toned down. The initial script was much more intense—the pteranodon scenes were intended to be truly perilous with significant repercussions, not just brief frights. The lab where the embryos were grown was also meant to be a prominent, unsettling location, highlighting the idea that these dinosaurs aren’t majestic creatures, but the result of reckless business practices—something that would have given the series a unique edge. Unfortunately, in the finished film, these elements were reduced to mere set dressing.

The Original Idea Didn’t Happen for Many Reasons

I understand a lot of compromises were made due to the difficult production of the third film. It was incredibly chaotic, with the script constantly being rewritten and scenes changing even during filming. Originally, Michael Crichton, who wrote the books, tried to develop the story, but he left early because he couldn’t come up with a solid idea for a new movie. Other writers then took over, working with Steven Spielberg and Joe Johnston. Eventually, the script I preferred was scrapped about five weeks before filming began, because the producers thought it was too complex and didn’t give a believable reason for Dr. Grant to return to the island, which I didn’t agree with.

I also get why the studio was worried about money. A complicated story with lots of different plotlines, major dangers, political issues, and a serious mood would have cost a lot more to make – more money for special effects and a more complex script. Plus, it might not have attracted as many viewers, and the studio wanted broad appeal. That’s why they went with a straightforward rescue story with a focus on survival. It was less expensive, quicker to produce, and easier to market.

Universal Pictures aimed for a safe and simple movie, and they achieved that goal – but it lacked memorability, which was a missed opportunity. The final product feels like it runs on its own without much thought, despite having the potential to be much better. That’s why I’m still so interested in seeing the original script for Jurassic Park III realized. It wasn’t about wanting a nostalgic rehash, but because the initial concept broadened the story in a logical way, gave the characters fresh direction, wasn’t afraid to experiment with the mood, and portrayed the dinosaurs as genuinely dangerous – unlike the final version, which relied on a predictable military rescue and a happy ending. The original script clearly had a stronger, more confident vision, while the released film feels like it was watered down.

Ultimately, I stand by my original vision, even if it seems stubborn. I believe the story version that would have had significant consequences, allowed the franchise to expand creatively, and honored the spirit of the first film – rather than simply meeting a deadline – was the better choice. I understand the reasons for the changes, but the more I reflect on it, the more I feel a huge opportunity was lost. The way Jurassic Park III ended up feels like we all missed out on what could have been the most compelling installment in this beloved series.

What do you think? Leave a comment below and join the conversation now in the ComicBook Forum!

https://comicbook.com/movies/news/best-jurassic-park-sequel-the-lost-world/embed/#

Read More

2025-12-25 19:47