- Lawmakers criticized Gensler, accusing the SEC of “selective enforcement” and rogue behavior.
- Gensler defended SEC’s stance, citing non-compliance in the cryptocurrency sector.
As a seasoned analyst with extensive experience in regulatory affairs and financial markets, I find myself deeply intrigued by the escalating tensions between SEC Chair Gary Gensler and lawmakers during the recent Congressional hearing on cryptocurrencies. The accusations leveled against Gensler, such as “selective enforcement” and turning the SEC into a “rogue agency,” are certainly noteworthy and require careful consideration.
On September 24th, the much-awaited moment for the cryptocurrency industry unfolded when SEC Chairman Gary Gensler was put under close examination during his appearance before the House Financial Services Committee.
Accusations against Gensler
During the hearing, lawmakers openly voiced their criticism towards SEC Chair Gary Gensler, with Representative Pete Sessions stating that the SEC was allegedly practicing “discriminatory application” or “preferential treatment.
Rep. Patrick McHenry asserted that Gensler transformed the SEC into “a rogue agency.”
Meanwhile, Rep. Tom Emmer bluntly claimed that Gensler “abused” the agency’s enforcement tools.
This discussion highlighted the growing disagreements between regulatory bodies and the cryptocurrency sector, casting doubt on what regulatory supervision may look like in the future.
That being said, Emmer confronted Gensler directly, and stated,
“The discrepancies you’ve shown regarding this matter have hindered our nation’s progress. The individual holding the position as the SEC chair, historically speaking, has been exceptionally destructive and unlawful.
Gensler defends himself and the SEC
Responding to which Gensler added,
“The current laws are in effect. If Congress decides to modify them, they can do so, but for now, we are upholding the law. Regrettably, there are several individuals in this field who are not adhering to these laws.
Gensler staunchly defended the SEC’s “regulation by enforcement” strategy.
He stated that many individuals operating within the cryptocurrency market do not adhere to current securities regulations.
However, he faced criticism from within the agency.
Instead, Commissioner Hester Peirce suggested that the SEC ought to have abandoned the term “cryptocurrency as a security” in court many years ago.
Peirce added,
“We’ve fallen on our duty as a regulator not to be precise.”
Major cases highlighted
Throughout the five-hour meeting, Gensler encountered strong criticism concerning the Debt Box case, in which the SEC claimed a suspected fraud of approximately $50 million.
For people not aware, the case got dismissed on the 28th of May, and it was decided that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) should cover a total of $1.8 million in costs.
Furthermore, Representative Emmer alleged that SEC lawyers were creating falsehoods to bolster Chairman Gensler’s negative stance towards cryptocurrency, as well as his regulatory approach, fueling worries about the SEC’s regulatory methods.
To which Gensler replied,
“The matters in that case were not well handled.”
As a researcher, I found myself at the center of a contentious debate when 42 American politicians urged for the revocation of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121, or SAB 121. However, amidst this pressure, my resolve, symbolized by Gary Gensler in this context, held steadfast. I stood firm on upholding the integrity and relevance of SAB 121.
Under questioning from Representative Wiley Nickel, Gensler confirmed that they would persist in enforcing the rule.
“No, it’s a good accounting bulletin.”
This position received substantial backlash, highlighting the controversial dynamic between the SEC and legislators who are worried about its potential effects on the crypto market.
What’s next for Gensler?
Despite facing opposition, Congressman Brad Sherman (D-CA32), who is renowned for his strong anti-Bitcoin stance in Congress, was the lone representative who backed Chairman Gensler.
He thanked the SEC for standing up for crypto and added,
As the aftermath of the latest congressional hearing fades away, it’s fascinating to contemplate where Gary Gensler might stand by the year 2025.
Will he continue as SEC Chair, possibly being dismissed if Donald Trump regains power, or will he be nominated for Treasury Secretary should Kamala Harris win, as speculations indicate?
Read More
- DYM PREDICTION. DYM cryptocurrency
- CYBER PREDICTION. CYBER cryptocurrency
- ZK PREDICTION. ZK cryptocurrency
- JASMY PREDICTION. JASMY cryptocurrency
- POPCAT PREDICTION. POPCAT cryptocurrency
- Top gainers and losers
- SKEY PREDICTION. SKEY cryptocurrency
- TURBO PREDICTION. TURBO cryptocurrency
- RUNE PREDICTION. RUNE cryptocurrency
- GEOD PREDICTION. GEOD cryptocurrency
2024-09-25 23:04