The Fabric of Reality: Can Spacetime Emerge From Spin?

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new theoretical approach proposes that spacetime isn’t a fundamental entity, but arises from the intricate interactions of elementary spinor particles.

This review explores how spin networks and causal fermion systems may provide a UV-complete description of emergent spacetime geometry.

The persistent incompatibility between general relativity and quantum field theory suggests spacetime geometry may not be fundamental, but rather an emergent phenomenon. This paper, ‘Gravitation and Spacetime: Emergent from Spinor Interactions — How?’, explores a framework wherein spacetime arises from the interactions of fundamental spinor particles, proposing that spin networks represent a UV-regularized description of this underlying structure. We compare diverse approaches – from loop quantum gravity to causal fermion systems – all rooted in spinor variables, highlighting a potential projection mechanism from particle interactions within causal regions onto emergent spacetime geometry. Could a unified understanding of these varied approaches reveal the fundamental constituents and dynamics driving the emergence of spacetime itself?

The Fragility of Spacetime: A Boundary to Knowledge

General Relativity, the cornerstone of modern gravitational physics, achieves astonishing accuracy in describing large-scale cosmic phenomena – from the orbits of planets to the expansion of the universe. However, this very same theory encounters fundamental limitations when applied to the realm of the incredibly small, specifically at the Planck Scale – a distance of approximately $1.6 \times 10^{-{35}} \text{ meters}$ . At this scale, the smooth, continuous fabric of spacetime predicted by Einstein’s equations is expected to give way to a turbulent, quantum foam where gravitational effects are as strong as any other fundamental force. Calculations reveal that attempting to describe gravity at such minuscule distances using General Relativity results in nonsensical, infinite values, indicating a breakdown of the theory’s predictive power. This failure isn’t merely a mathematical inconvenience; it strongly suggests that a more comprehensive theory, one that successfully merges General Relativity with the principles of quantum mechanics – a theory of quantum gravity – is essential to fully understand the universe at its most fundamental level and unlock the secrets governing spacetime itself.

The very equations that have successfully predicted gravitational phenomena for over a century – the Einstein Field Equations – ultimately falter when applied to the universe’s most extreme conditions. These equations, which elegantly connect spacetime geometry with energy and momentum, assume a continuous, smooth fabric of spacetime. However, at the Planck scale – a realm of incomprehensibly small distances – quantum mechanics suggests spacetime itself is likely granular and probabilistic, not smooth. This inherent incompatibility creates singularities – points where the equations break down and predict infinite densities – within black holes and at the universe’s very beginning. The emergence of these singularities isn’t merely a mathematical inconvenience; it signifies a fundamental limit to the Einstein Field Equations’ descriptive power, demanding a more comprehensive theory capable of unifying gravity with the quantum world and resolving these problematic predictions.

The enduring challenge in theoretical physics lies in the incompatibility between general relativity and quantum mechanics, two pillars of modern understanding. While each theory accurately describes its respective domain – the large-scale structure of the universe and the behavior of subatomic particles – attempts to combine them into a single, consistent framework consistently fail. This isn’t merely a mathematical inconvenience; it represents a fundamental conceptual gap in our knowledge. General relativity treats spacetime as a smooth, continuous fabric, while quantum mechanics dictates that energy, and therefore all physical quantities, are quantized – existing in discrete, granular units. Reconciling these drastically different views of reality demands a theory of quantum gravity, one that can describe gravity at the smallest scales and resolve the singularities predicted by general relativity, such as those found within black holes or at the very beginning of the universe. The absence of such a theory suggests that our understanding of spacetime itself may be incomplete, potentially requiring entirely new concepts to bridge the divide between the quantum and the gravitational realms.

The persistent challenge in modern physics lies in bridging the gap between General Relativity and quantum mechanics, a struggle fundamentally rooted in their contrasting depictions of reality. General Relativity portrays spacetime as a smooth, continuous fabric, warped by mass and energy, allowing for predictable gravitational interactions described by the Einstein Field Equations. However, quantum mechanics dictates that at the smallest scales, energy, momentum, and even spacetime itself are quantized – existing in discrete, granular units. Attempts to combine these frameworks stumble because quantizing gravity leads to mathematical inconsistencies and infinities; the smooth geometry presupposed by General Relativity simply cannot accommodate the inherent uncertainty and discreteness of the quantum world. This incompatibility isn’t merely a mathematical hurdle; it suggests that spacetime, as currently understood, may not be a fundamental property of the universe, but rather an emergent phenomenon arising from a deeper, more granular reality – a concept explored in approaches like loop quantum gravity and string theory, which attempt to redefine spacetime at the Planck scale.

A Fabric of Loops: Quantizing the Void

Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) departs from classical general relativity by postulating that spacetime is not a smooth, continuous manifold, but rather possesses a discrete, granular structure at the Planck scale. This granularity implies that fundamental geometric quantities, such as area and volume, are not infinitely divisible but are instead quantized – meaning they can only take on discrete values. The minimum measurable unit of area is approximately $10^{-{70}} \text{ m}^2$ , and correspondingly, volume is quantized as well. This quantization arises from the mathematical framework of LQG, which treats space as being woven from finite “loops” and “nodes,” resulting in a fundamentally discrete geometry rather than a continuous one. This discrete structure has implications for the behavior of spacetime at extremely small scales and potentially resolves singularities predicted by classical general relativity.

Spin networks in Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) provide a mathematical framework for describing the quantum states of spacetime geometry. These networks are composed of nodes, representing quantized volumes of space, and links, representing quantized areas. The connections between nodes are labeled with intertwiners, which dictate how these areas connect. At the Planck scale (approximately $10^{-{35}}$ meters), spacetime is not smooth but fundamentally discrete, and spin networks provide a means to represent this granular structure. The quantum state of space is then described by a specific spin network, with the properties of the network – its nodes, links, and intertwiners – determining the geometric properties of the corresponding region of space. Different spin network configurations represent different possible quantum geometries.

The quantization of general relativity is significantly aided by the introduction of Ashtekar variables, which reformulate Einstein’s equations into a form more closely resembling Yang-Mills theory. This transformation allows the application of well-established techniques from gauge theory quantization. Central to this process are holonomy loops, which describe how a vector changes when transported around a closed loop in spacetime. These loops, coupled with the Ashtekar formulation, effectively decouple the gravitational and Lorentz degrees of freedom, simplifying calculations and enabling the definition of quantum operators for geometric quantities like area and volume. The use of these variables doesn’t alter the physics, but provides a mathematical framework where quantization procedures become more manageable, offering a pathway to potentially resolving singularities and understanding the quantum nature of spacetime at the Planck scale.

The formulation of area and volume operators within Loop Quantum Gravity allows for the calculation of geometric quantities at the Planck scale, treating space itself as quantized. These operators, derived from the dynamics of spin networks and the use of Ashtekar variables, do not yield definite values for area or volume, but rather spectra of discrete eigenvalues. Specifically, area is quantized in units of $\sqrt{\gamma} l_P^2$ and volume in units of $j l_P^3$ , where γ is the Barbero-Immirzi parameter, and $l_P$ is the Planck length. This discretization implies that spatial geometry is not smooth at the Planck scale, but composed of discrete quanta of area and volume, fundamentally altering the classical notion of continuous spacetime.

Correlations as Genesis: Spacetime from Within

Causal Fermion Systems (CFS) posit that spacetime emerges not as a pre-existing arena, but as a consequence of correlations between fermionic projector states. These states, representing the possible configurations of fermions, are mathematically linked through a correlation functional. The resulting structure defines a spacetime region based on the commutation properties of these projectors; specifically, events are causally related if their associated projectors commute within a defined double cone structure. This approach differs from traditional spacetime models by grounding the causal structure directly in the quantum properties of matter, rather than postulating spacetime as a fundamental entity. The resulting geometry is therefore derived from the algebraic relations between fermionic states, and is not imposed a priori. $\mathcal{C} = \{ \rho : [ \rho(x), \rho(y) ] = 0 \}$ represents the causal domain determined by commuting projector states.

Causal fermion systems establish causality through the use of double cones, regions of spacetime defined by light cone intervals. The causal relation between two events is determined by whether one event’s future light cone intersects the other event’s past light cone; double cones provide a mathematically precise method for assessing this intersection and therefore causal connection. Specifically, the system defines causality by requiring that the intersection of the double cones associated with two events is non-empty for them to be causally related. This approach avoids the need for pre-defined spacetime structures, instead deriving causality directly from the correlations of fermionic states, and offers a rigorous framework where causal relationships are determined by observable quantities within the system, based on $C_{xy} = \langle \psi_x | \psi_y \rangle$ , where ψ represents the fermionic projector states.

The causal structure emerging from Causal Fermion Systems is not merely compatible with fermionic quantum properties, but is directly derived from them. Specifically, the causal relationships between events are defined by the correlations present in the algebraic states of fermionic projectors. This means the spacetime geometry – and thus, the allowable causal connections – is fundamentally dependent on the quantum mechanical behavior of fermions, treating matter as the basis for spacetime rather than existing within a pre-defined spacetime. This contrasts with conventional approaches where spacetime is a background structure and fermions propagate on it. The resulting geometry is therefore intrinsically linked to the properties of these fundamental particles, establishing a direct connection between the distribution of matter and the structure of spacetime itself; alterations in fermionic states necessarily result in alterations to the causal structure.

Spinors, mathematical objects transforming under Lorentz transformations, are integral to describing the quantum states of fermions and naturally encode spacetime orientation. Their incorporation, alongside tetrad frame fields – also known as vierbeins – establishes a local connection between the internal degrees of freedom of fermions and the tangent space of spacetime. Tetrads map flat Minkowski spacetime to the potentially curved spacetime manifold, allowing for the translation between flat-space fermion fields and their curved-space counterparts. This formalism enables the definition of covariant derivatives and field equations that are consistent with both general relativity and quantum field theory, thereby demonstrating how the geometric structure of spacetime emerges from the quantum properties of fermionic fields and their associated spinor representations. Specifically, the metric tensor $g_{\mu\nu}$ can be derived from the inner product of tetrad vectors, linking the spacetime geometry directly to the quantum fields.

Beyond Prediction: Implications for Reality Itself

Current research utilizing Loop Quantum Gravity and Causal Fermion Systems proposes a novel approach to understanding black hole entropy, potentially circumventing the long-standing information paradox. These frameworks calculate entropy not from microscopic counting of states, but directly from the geometry of the black hole’s event horizon. Specifically, entropy is found to be proportional to the area of the horizon, a result derived by analyzing the intersections of fundamental quantum spinors with the horizon’s spherical surface. This geometric derivation offers a compelling explanation for the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula $S = \frac{k_B c^3 A}{4 G \hbar}$ , suggesting that information isn’t lost, but rather encoded in the horizon’s quantum structure, a result that aligns with the principles of quantum mechanics and offers a pathway toward resolving the apparent conflict between general relativity and quantum field theory in the extreme environment of a black hole.

The holographic principle, positing that all information contained within a volume of space can be represented on its boundary, receives compelling support from Loop Quantum Gravity and Causal Fermion Systems. These frameworks don’t merely accommodate the principle – they appear to require it as a natural consequence of their quantized spacetime structure. Specifically, the discrete nature of spacetime in these theories implies a finite number of degrees of freedom at any given boundary, directly correlating with the information content of the enclosed volume. This arises from the way these systems calculate entropy – linking it to the area of the boundary surface rather than the volume within – suggesting information isn’t stored in the space, but on its edges. Consequently, the universe can be viewed as a vast, intricate hologram, where three-dimensional reality emerges from information encoded on a distant, two-dimensional surface, a concept elegantly mirrored in the mathematical foundations of these quantum gravity approaches.

Conventional physics often assumes a fundamental limit to how finely spacetime can be divided, dictated by the Planck length. However, loop quantum gravity and causal fermion systems propose a different perspective: the granular structure of spacetime isn’t necessarily fixed at this scale. Instead, the effective scale of geometry appears to be dynamically determined by the density of particle interactions and the inherent timing provided by Compton clocks – natural oscillators arising from particle dynamics. This means regions with higher particle densities would exhibit a finer granularity, while sparser regions would have a coarser structure. Consequently, the regularization length used in calculations – a crucial parameter to avoid infinities – isn’t a universal constant like the Planck length, but rather a locally determined value reflecting the environment’s particle activity. This framework suggests that spacetime’s fundamental scale isn’t an absolute limit, but an emergent property intimately linked to the distribution of matter and energy within it, potentially offering a more nuanced understanding of quantum gravity and the universe’s deepest structures.

Current theoretical frameworks, notably Loop Quantum Gravity and Causal Dynamical Triangulations, propose a radical shift in understanding gravity – not as a fundamental force, but as an emergent phenomenon rooted in entropy. This perspective posits that gravity arises from the tendency of systems to maximize their entropy, much like the second law of thermodynamics dictates. Crucially, the scale at which this emergence occurs isn’t necessarily fixed at the traditionally assumed Planck length. Instead, the relevant ‘regularization length’ – the scale below which quantum effects dominate – is determined by the density of particle interactions and the inherent ‘clocks’ provided by Compton wavelengths. This offers a potential resolution to issues requiring arbitrary cutoffs in quantum field theory, suggesting gravity’s strength and behavior are intrinsically linked to the underlying microstructure of spacetime and the distribution of matter and energy within it. Consequently, gravity isn’t imposed on spacetime; rather, spacetime geometry itself emerges from the statistical behavior of its constituent parts, offering a compelling alternative to conventional gravitational models.

The exploration of spacetime as an emergent phenomenon, detailed within the study, resonates with a fundamental principle of self-organization. Rather than imposing a structure from above, the interactions of spinor particles, represented by spin networks, give rise to geometry. This mirrors the idea that order doesn’t require architects; it arises from local rules. As Richard Feynman once stated, “The best way to understand something is to create a model of it.” The paper’s construction of spacetime from fundamental interactions embodies this philosophy, offering a model where the universe isn’t governed by pre-defined structures, but by the influence of countless connections and their emergent properties, a tangible demonstration of governance without interference.

The Road Ahead

The assertion that spacetime itself is not fundamental, but a consequence of underlying spinor interactions, shifts the focus from constructing gravity to understanding how its appearance is simply a natural outcome. This work, grounded in spin networks and causal fermion systems, suggests that global regularities emerge from simple rules at the Planck scale, offering a potential pathway towards a UV-complete theory. However, a significant hurdle remains: translating the abstract structure of spin networks into a predictive framework capable of reproducing the established successes of general relativity – and beyond. Simply having a UV-finite theory isn’t enough; it must also look like the universe it describes.

Future investigations will likely need to concentrate on the dynamics of these spinor networks. How do interactions propagate? What mechanisms give rise to the observed large-scale homogeneity and isotropy? And crucially, can a deeper understanding of entanglement within these networks illuminate the nature of dark energy and dark matter? Any attempt at directive management – at forcing spacetime to behave in a certain way – seems unlikely to succeed. Instead, the emphasis should be on identifying the fundamental principles governing the interactions, and allowing the geometry to arise as an emergent property.

The ultimate test will be whether this approach can resolve the long-standing tension between quantum mechanics and general relativity. If spacetime is indeed emergent, the very notion of a singular spacetime metric may prove to be an approximation, valid only at macroscopic scales. The true fundamental description will likely reside in the dynamics of the underlying spinor systems, a realm where the conventional tools of geometry and topology may need to be radically rethought.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.00070.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

The Fragility of Spacetime: A Boundary to Knowledge

A Fabric of Loops: Quantizing the Void

Correlations as Genesis: Spacetime from Within

Beyond Prediction: Implications for Reality Itself

The Road Ahead

See also: