The proposal for restricting exports of a new AI chip made by the departing Biden administration has stirred opposition within the technology industry due to fears that it could hinder advancements and weaken America’s dominance in this field.
On January 13th, the White House released a plan outlining a system of limits on semiconductor sales, which would be implemented except for 18 selected allies and partners. This restriction would involve both cap and licensing policies.
The White House’s proposal has faced criticism from the tech sector. In a blog post on January 13th, Ned Finkle, Vice President of Government Affairs at Nvidia (a major chip company), stated that the plan was “misguided” and could potentially hinder “innovation and economic growth.
He stated that the proposed regulations aim to govern technology on a global scale, encompassing technologies that are commonly found in high-end gaming computers and everyday consumer devices.
Instead of addressing potential risks, the newly proposed Biden regulations might instead erode America’s international competitive edge, potentially damaging the innovative spirit that has traditionally placed the U.S. in a leading position. Finkle commented on this.
As more companies increase their investment in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Microsoft unveiled plans in September of last year to set up two AI research centers in Abu Dhabi, and has also made significant AI-related commitments over the next few years, leading up to 2024.
According to the proposal, the White House suggests allowing up to 50,000 semiconductor imports per nation (except for 18 specific ones). If there are government-to-government agreements, this limit could potentially increase to 100,000.
In specific nations, institutions have the option to buy as many as 320,000 microchips within a span of two years. Purchases of up to 1,700 chips do not necessitate an import license and will not contribute towards the limit.
Daniel Castro, vice-president at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a tech think tank, stated that forcing other countries to pick either the U.S. or China as their primary ally could lead to losing important allies, due to the potential for alienation of key partners.
In my research, I’ve observed that when faced with such a choice, numerous nations might lean towards the faction providing them continual access to AI technologies pivotal for their economic advancement and digital destinies – a privilege currently held by only one country, who has indicated intentions of withdrawing this access.
In simpler terms, Castro suggests that this framework could disadvantage U.S. businesses by imposing heavy regulations they must adhere to, while their foreign competitors could avoid these burdens. This could potentially weaken U.S. companies when competing on a global scale.
The head of the Semiconductor Industry Association, John Neufferthe, expressed concerns that policies were being expedited without giving the industry a chance to contribute their insights.
He stated that the recent regulation might unwittingly inflict permanent harm on America’s economy and its lead in semiconductors and Artificial Intelligence industries, as it allows our rivals to dominate key markets instead.
“The stakes are high, and the timing is fraught.”
Conversely, U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo endorsed this action, stating on January 13 that this policy would safeguard the nation from potential security threats related to artificial intelligence, all the while positioning the U.S. at the forefront of technological advancement.
To effectively address these genuine national security challenges, it’s crucial to consider the advancements in artificial intelligence, understand the potential of our opponents, and accommodate the wishes of our allies who want to collaborate on this technology,” she pointed out.
The recently proposed restrictions are open for public comments over the next 120 days, after which it will fall upon the incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump to implement these rules.
Read More
- RLC PREDICTION. RLC cryptocurrency
- OKB PREDICTION. OKB cryptocurrency
- CAKE PREDICTION. CAKE cryptocurrency
- TRB PREDICTION. TRB cryptocurrency
- TRAC PREDICTION. TRAC cryptocurrency
- XDC PREDICTION. XDC cryptocurrency
- FLOKI PREDICTION. FLOKI cryptocurrency
- SXP PREDICTION. SXP cryptocurrency
- ZEN PREDICTION. ZEN cryptocurrency
- POL PREDICTION. POL cryptocurrency
2025-01-14 09:38