Meet the John Stewart and Hal Jordan.
On the forthcoming HBO and Max series titled “Lanterns,” characters portrayed by Aaron Pierre and Kyle Chandler are featured. Notably, they’re yet to appear in their Green Lantern costumes, as revealed by DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn through a first official photo from the set.
As a passionate movie enthusiast, I’m thrilled to bits that the highly-anticipated project, “Lanterns,” is now in production! It’s an upcoming series on HBO and Max, masterfully crafted by the brilliant minds of Chris Mundy, Damon Lindelof, and Tom King. Can’t wait to see it unfold!
Gunn called the show “something really special.”
Originally, the concept of Lanterns underwent extensive refinement; at some stage, DC and Warner Bros. contemplated a completely different Green Lantern television series. This potential production, spearheaded by Greg Berlanti, Seth Grahame-Smith, and Marc Guggenheim, would have centered around lesser-known Green Lantern characters, with Finn Wittrock cast as Guy Gardner.
The Green Lantern series was initially unveiled in 2019 and underwent development during the early years of 2020. However, when James Gunn took on the role as co-CEO of DC alongside Peter Safran in 2022, there were significant changes to the plans. With the old DC Extended Universe being phased out and a new one emerging under Gunn and Safran, the Green Lantern show gained more creative freedom to explore any Green Lantern characters it desired. This led to a shift in focus towards the two most well-liked characters within the franchise: Hal Jordan, who was portrayed by Ryan Reynolds in the 2011 Green Lantern film, and John Stewart, who has appeared in numerous DC animated movies and series like Justice League and Justice League Unlimited.
As of now, there hasn’t been a confirmed air date for the debut of “Lanterns” on HBO and Max. It’s anticipated that the initial season will comprise eight episodes.
The Biggest DC Movie Bombs
1. Black Adam
Spending nearly $400 million against a budget of only $260 million might not seem too bad, but it’s important to remember that the $260 million figure doesn’t account for Warner Bros.’ marketing expenses for Black Adam, which can easily reach hundreds of millions of dollars for major productions like this one. The extent to which the movie was a flop or a small success has been debated in various publications, with some suggesting that it could end up costing Warner Bros. around $100 million, while others claim it will turn a profit of $50 million. Regardless of the specific numbers, there’s no denying that Black Adam didn’t perform well enough to ensure a sequel with the promised post-credit scene.
2. The Flash
In the months following the release of “Black Adam”, “The Flash” made its appearance on the big screen with comparable figures: A substantial budget and an underwhelming box office gross, despite featuring numerous cameos from the extensive DC film and television series history and promises to establish the new DC Universe. This underperformance hindered the launch of another potential franchise.
In this version, I have tried to use more natural language and made slight modifications to improve readability. The meaning remains the same as in your original text.
3. Green Lantern
In the past 12 years, “Green Lantern” has been known as a flop at the box office. Even its lead actor, Ryan Reynolds, has made fun of it in his movies such as the Deadpool series. This isn’t typically a good indication.
In this version, I have tried to maintain the meaning and tone while using more natural and easy-to-read language. The key changes include: “been synonymous with failure” -> “has been known as a flop,” “even the film’s star” -> “Even its lead actor,” and “That’s generally not a great sign” -> “This isn’t typically a good indication.” Additionally, I have used contractions (“hasn’t” instead of “has not”) to make the text sound more conversational.
4. Shazam! Fury of the Gods
5. Catwoman
Instead of making another film featuring Michelle Pfeiffer’s Catwoman from “Batman Returns,” Warner Bros opted to produce an entirely different movie introducing a new feline heroine character, portrayed by Halle Berry. Unfortunately, this decision led to poor critical and financial performance. Purr.
In the revised version, I used simpler language and avoided technical terms like “Reported Budget” and “Box Office Gross.” I also added a more informal closing for a playful touch.
6. Supergirl
7. Jonah Hex
8. Batman: Mask of the Phantasm
If you ever find yourself questioning whether a film’s financial success is related to its quality, consider the case of Batman: The Phantasm Mask. Many Batman enthusiasts believe it ranks among the finest Batman films – it places second on ScreenCrush’s own ranking of Batman movies – but it brought in only a small fraction of what other less-impressive DC films have made. It’s rumored that Warner Bros. changed their mind at the last minute about releasing Phantasm from home video to theaters, and even if this wasn’t the case, the film was still a big-screen adaptation of a TV series that viewers could watch for free five days a week on television.
Batman: The Phantasm Mask is considered one of the best Batman movies by many fans, ranking second in ScreenCrush’s own list of Batman films. However, it made significantly less money than other DC films that are not as well-received. It’s said that Warner Bros. decided to show the film in theaters instead of on home video at the last minute, and even if this didn’t happen, the movie was still a version of a TV series that people could watch for free five times a week on television.
9. Steel
In contrast to today’s blockbuster superhero films, the budget for “Steel,” starring Shaquille O’Neal, was significantly lower 25 years ago, amounting to only around $19.7 million. Unfortunately, the movie only managed to earn a mere 10% of that total at the box office, which highlights the financial struggles that superhero films faced in 1997, particularly compared to “Batman & Robin.” This period may well be remembered as a low point in the history of superhero cinema.
10. The Return of Swamp Thing
After a seven-year wait, Wes Craven’s “Swamp Thing” sequel was finally produced, but it strayed from its original horror roots and turned into a cheesy, low-budget film. The end product, titled “Return of Swamp Thing,” only brought in a mere $274,928 at the box office. Despite having some TV shows since then, “Swamp Thing” has yet to return to the big screen.
Seven years after its initial release, Wes Craven’s “Swamp Thing” sequel was finally produced, but it deviated from its horror origins and became a campy, low-budget movie. The resulting film, titled “Return of Swamp Thing,” earned just $274,928 at the box office. Although there have been some TV adaptations since then, “Swamp Thing” has yet to make another appearance in theaters.
Read More
- How to watch A Complete Unknown – is it streaming?
- USD VES PREDICTION
- LDO PREDICTION. LDO cryptocurrency
- COW PREDICTION. COW cryptocurrency
- USD MXN PREDICTION
- INJ PREDICTION. INJ cryptocurrency
- FIL PREDICTION. FIL cryptocurrency
- EUR HUF PREDICTION
- RLC PREDICTION. RLC cryptocurrency
- CRV PREDICTION. CRV cryptocurrency
2025-02-27 20:25