Entangled Fermions: Probing New Physics with Polarized Collisions

Author: Denis Avetisyan


Researchers are exploring how the quantum properties of fermion-antifermion pairs, created in high-energy lepton collisions, can reveal insights beyond the Standard Model.

The study investigates how different new physics scenarios-including scalar, vector, and tensor interactions-manifest in correlations observed in particle collisions, revealing distinctions in purity <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\Gamma\Gamma</span>, concurrence <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">{\cal C}</span>, the Bell-CHSH observable <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">{\cal B}\_{\rm CHSH}</span>, and measures of entanglement like helicity-basis SREM2M\_{2} and beam-basis SREM2(z^)M\_{2}^{(\hat{z})}, all as functions of the scattering angle <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\cos\Theta</span> at a center-of-mass energy of 500 GeV and an effective field theory cutoff scale of <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">\Lambda/3</span>, demonstrating how these observables vary across different polarization settings-unpolarized, PP, PN, NP, and NN-to characterize the underlying physics.
The study investigates how different new physics scenarios-including scalar, vector, and tensor interactions-manifest in correlations observed in particle collisions, revealing distinctions in purity \Gamma\Gamma, concurrence {\cal C}, the Bell-CHSH observable {\cal B}\_{\rm CHSH}, and measures of entanglement like helicity-basis SREM2M\_{2} and beam-basis SREM2(z^)M\_{2}^{(\hat{z})}, all as functions of the scattering angle \cos\Theta at a center-of-mass energy of 500 GeV and an effective field theory cutoff scale of \Lambda/3, demonstrating how these observables vary across different polarization settings-unpolarized, PP, PN, NP, and NN-to characterize the underlying physics.

This review details how measurements of purity, concurrence, and Rényi entropy from polarized collisions can be used to probe four-fermion operators and test effective field theory predictions.

Despite the Standard Model’s successes, fundamental questions regarding fermion interactions remain open to new physics. This motivates the study presented in ‘Quantum properties of heavy-fermion pairs at a lepton collider with polarised beams’, which explores how polarised lepton collisions can illuminate the quantum correlations within heavy-fermion pairs. By analysing spin density matrices and quantum observables-such as purity, entanglement, and Rényi entropy-we demonstrate that beam polarisation significantly enhances sensitivity to both Standard Model parameters and potential new interactions parametrised by four-fermion operators. Could precision measurements of these quantum properties at future colliders unlock a deeper understanding of fermion couplings and reveal signatures beyond the Standard Model?


Beyond the Standard Model: Unveiling the Universe’s Hidden Interactions

Despite its remarkable predictive power, the Standard Model of particle physics is not considered a complete theory. Evidence suggests its limitations at energy scales beyond those currently accessible in experiments, hinting at a more fundamental underlying structure. This isn’t necessarily a failure of the model, but rather an indication that it’s an effective description of reality valid only up to a certain energy. Phenomena like dark matter, neutrino masses, and the matter-antimatter asymmetry in the universe cannot be explained within the Standard Model’s framework. Furthermore, theoretical considerations, such as the hierarchy problem – the vast difference between the weak scale and the Planck scale – strongly suggest the existence of new particles and interactions at higher energies. Consequently, physicists are actively exploring extensions to the Standard Model, seeking to uncover the new physics that may lie just beyond our current reach, potentially revealed through high-energy collisions or precision measurements.

Effective Field Theory, or EFT, offers a powerful and systematic approach to exploring physics beyond the Standard Model by acknowledging that new, high-scale interactions are likely not directly observable, but rather manifest as subtle modifications to known processes. Instead of postulating specific new particles, EFT focuses on describing the effects of unknown high-energy physics through a series of added terms to the Standard Model Lagrangian. Crucially, these new interactions are often parameterized by \text{Four-Fermion Operators}, which describe interactions involving pairs of fermions – fundamental particles like quarks and leptons. The strength of these operators, determined by experimental data, effectively captures the influence of the unknown high-energy physics at lower, accessible energies, allowing physicists to constrain potential new theories and search for deviations from Standard Model predictions with greater precision.

The search for physics beyond the Standard Model often focuses on how new interactions subtly alter the behavior of known particles. These potential interactions don’t simply introduce entirely new forces, but rather modify how fundamental fermions – quarks and leptons – interact with each other and with the force-carrying bosons. Characterizing these modifications requires extremely precise measurements of fermion interactions, looking for deviations from the predictions of the Standard Model. Any observed anomaly, however small, could signal the presence of new physics, potentially revealed through changes in scattering cross-sections, decay rates, or the subtle shifts in particle properties. This necessitates increasingly sophisticated experiments and theoretical frameworks to disentangle the effects of these potential new interactions from the established Standard Model processes, a task demanding both experimental ingenuity and theoretical precision to map out the landscape of possible beyond-the-Standard-Model scenarios.

The interpretation of data from high-energy particle collisions-such as those produced at the Large Hadron Collider-relies heavily on a precise understanding of fundamental particle interactions. Any deviation from predictions based on the Standard Model could signal the presence of new physics, but discerning genuine signals from background noise demands a detailed characterization of potential modifications to known interactions. Researchers utilize frameworks like Effective Field Theory to systematically explore these possibilities, searching for evidence of new forces or particles influencing how fermions-the building blocks of matter-interact. This careful analysis isn’t merely about confirming or refuting theoretical predictions; it’s about constructing a more complete picture of the universe at its most fundamental level, potentially revealing entirely new phenomena beyond the reach of current understanding and paving the way for future discoveries.

The scalar four-fermion interaction exhibits varying stabilizer Rényi entropies, <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M_2M_2</span>, depending on the parameters: in the helicity basis, these are visualized across the <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(\eta_S, \beta)</span> plane, and in the beam basis across the <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(\delta_S, \cos\Theta)</span> plane.
The scalar four-fermion interaction exhibits varying stabilizer Rényi entropies, M_2M_2, depending on the parameters: in the helicity basis, these are visualized across the (\eta_S, \beta) plane, and in the beam basis across the (\delta_S, \cos\Theta) plane.

Defining Quantum States: The Density Matrix Formalism

The ρ representing the FinalStateDensityMatrix is a Hermitian operator that completely defines the quantum state of the produced fermions. Unlike a wavefunction which describes a pure state, the density matrix accommodates both pure and mixed states, accounting for any statistical mixture of possible outcomes. All measurable information about the fermion’s spin is encoded within the matrix elements of ρ, including polarization, entanglement with other particles, and correlations between spin components. Consequently, a complete knowledge of the FinalStateDensityMatrix is equivalent to a complete specification of the quantum state of the final state fermions, providing a basis for analyzing their production mechanisms and properties.

The production characteristics of final state fermions are directly modulated by both the production angle, denoted as θ, and the initial polarization of the incident beams. θ defines the angular distribution of the produced fermions relative to the beam axis, impacting observable decay rates and angular correlations. Initial BeamPolarization, a vector quantity, describes the degree to which the incoming particles are spin-aligned; variations in this parameter influence the overall spin density matrix of the final state fermions and, consequently, their decay asymmetries. Precise knowledge of these production parameters is therefore crucial for accurately reconstructing the FinalStateDensityMatrix and inferring the underlying interaction responsible for fermion production.

The FinalStateDensityMatrix reflects the specific quantum mechanical properties of the fermion production process, and is therefore sensitive to the type of interaction governing that process. γ matrices appear in the interaction terms defining VectorLikeInteraction and AxialVectorLikeInteraction, leading to unique contributions to the density matrix related to vector and axial-vector currents. ScalarInteraction, involving a simple scalar coupling, contributes a term proportional to the identity matrix, altering the overall magnitude of certain density matrix elements. TensorInteraction, characterized by a rank-2 tensor coupling, introduces a more complex contribution, influencing the angular distribution of the produced fermions as encoded within the density matrix. Distinguishing between these contributions is essential for determining the underlying interaction responsible for fermion production.

Reconstructing the FinalStateDensityMatrix is critical for determining the characteristics of the interaction producing the fermions because the matrix encapsulates the complete quantum state information. Different interaction types – VectorLike, AxialVectorLike, Scalar, and Tensor – each contribute a unique signature to the elements of the density matrix. Analysis of these elements allows for differentiation between these interaction types and, crucially, provides parameters defining the strength and nature of the underlying force mediating the fermion production. Therefore, precise determination of the FinalStateDensityMatrix is essential for experimental verification or refutation of theoretical models predicting these interactions.

The beam-basis stabilizer Rényi entropy <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">M_2^{(\hat{z})}</span> reveals the interaction’s structure across the <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(\sin^2\bar{\Phi}, \cos\Theta)</span> plane for axial-vector-like interactions <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(\cos\eta_A = 0)</span>.
The beam-basis stabilizer Rényi entropy M_2^{(\hat{z})} reveals the interaction’s structure across the (\sin^2\bar{\Phi}, \cos\Theta) plane for axial-vector-like interactions (\cos\eta_A = 0).

Mapping Entanglement: Metrics for Quantum State Characterization

Quantifying entanglement requires metrics derived from the \text{FinalStateDensityMatrix}. Concurrence and the Bell-CHSH observable are two such metrics. Concurrence assesses the degree of entanglement, with a value of 0 indicating a completely disentangled state. The Bell-CHSH observable, bounded between 0 and 2, provides a measure of the violation of local realism and is directly related to the strength of the entanglement present in the quantum state. Both metrics allow for a numerical determination of entanglement, facilitating the comparison of different quantum states and processes.

The purity of the final quantum state, a measure of its mixedness, is quantified by the Purity metric and ranges from 0.25, representing a maximally mixed state with no coherence, to 1, indicating a pure state. This value is directly determined by the beam polarization parameters 𝒫 and 𝒫¯. A purity value closer to 1 signifies a more coherent and less mixed state, while a value approaching 0.25 indicates a state with maximal statistical uncertainty. The specific values of 𝒫 and 𝒫¯ therefore dictate the degree of mixedness present in the final quantum state.

Stabilizer Rényi Entropy quantifies the degree of non-stabilizer resources present in a quantum state, which are necessary for implementing universal quantum computation beyond the capabilities of stabilizer quantum circuits. This metric ranges from 0 for maximally entangled states – requiring minimal non-stabilizer resources – to a maximum value dependent on the polarization parameters |𝒫|=|𝒫¯|=−1+2≃0.644. Higher values of Stabilizer Rényi Entropy indicate a greater need for non-stabilizer operations to achieve full quantum computational power, providing a precise measure of the state’s suitability for complex quantum algorithms.

Quantification of entanglement in the final state reveals initial conditions of zero concurrence, indicating the absence of entanglement prior to interaction. The Bell-CHSH observable, a measure of correlation, attains a maximum value of 2, directly proportional to the product of the beam polarization parameters |𝒫𝒫¯|. Stabilizer Rényi Entropy, inversely related to entanglement, ranges from 0 – representing maximal entanglement – up to a polarization-dependent maximum value of approximately 0.644, achieved when |𝒫|=|𝒫¯|=−1+2≃0.644. These metrics collectively characterize the quantum state, allowing for differentiation between various interaction scenarios and providing a detailed understanding of entanglement dynamics.

The tensor interaction exhibits varying degrees of entanglement, as demonstrated by the purity Γ, concurrence <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">{\\cal C}</span>, and Bell-CHSH observable <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">{\\cal B}_{\\rm CHSH}</span> which are dependent on the parameters <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(\\sin^{2}\\tilde{\\Phi},\\cos\\Theta)</span> and <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false">(\\beta,\\cos\\Theta)</span>.
The tensor interaction exhibits varying degrees of entanglement, as demonstrated by the purity Γ, concurrence {\\cal C}, and Bell-CHSH observable {\\cal B}_{\\rm CHSH} which are dependent on the parameters (\\sin^{2}\\tilde{\\Phi},\\cos\\Theta) and (\\beta,\\cos\\Theta).

The study meticulously outlines a pathway to discern quantum entanglement within fermion-antifermion pairs-a demonstration of probing beyond simple efficiency. This resonates with Karl Popper’s assertion that “The more we know, the more we understand how little we know.” The paper doesn’t merely seek to detect entanglement, but to quantify it via observables like Rényi entropy and concurrence, acknowledging the inherent limitations of measurement and the need for rigorous analysis. Such a commitment to acknowledging uncertainty is crucial; a focus solely on extracting information without understanding its epistemic boundaries risks automating flawed assumptions and accelerating towards potentially harmful outcomes. The work exemplifies a principled approach to exploring the quantum realm, acknowledging the necessity of continually refining understanding.

Where Does the Quantum Road Lead?

The pursuit of quantum entanglement in heavy-fermion pairs, as detailed in this work, is not merely an exercise in particle physics. It is, implicitly, a calibration of values. Any algorithm designed to detect entanglement – to discern correlation from mere coincidence – encodes assumptions about what constitutes a meaningful connection. The precision demanded by polarized beam collisions forces a confrontation with the limits of measurement, and, by extension, the limits of knowing. The very act of quantifying purity, concurrence, or Rényi entropy is a declaration of what is considered ‘information’ in this context.

Future investigations must move beyond simply observing these quantum properties. The effective field theory approach, while powerful, risks becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy if not paired with rigorous scrutiny of the underlying assumptions. A measurement confirming ‘new physics’ is meaningless if the framework used to interpret it is blind to its own biases. Sometimes, fixing code is fixing ethics – ensuring the algorithms used to analyze these collisions do not systematically disadvantage certain theoretical models or interpretations.

The true challenge lies not in pushing the boundaries of detection, but in broadening the scope of inquiry. What vulnerabilities are inherent in relying on these observables as sole arbiters of reality? What unseen correlations might be discarded in the pursuit of quantifiable entanglement? The quantum world offers a mirror; it reflects not just the universe, but the values of those who seek to understand it.


Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.09558.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-01-15 06:58