Australia fines Kraken operator $5M for regulatory breaches

As a seasoned researcher and observer of the dynamic world of finance and technology, I find myself continually intrigued by the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency exchanges. The recent ruling against Bit Trade, the Australian operator of Kraken, serves as an interesting case study that highlights both the promise and perils of this burgeoning industry.

In simpler terms, the Australian court has imposed a fine of approximately $5.1 million U.S. dollars on the local operator of the American cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, in accordance with their decision that supports Australia’s corporate regulatory body.

In a ruling on December 12th, Justice John Nicholas mandated that Kraken Australia’s operator, Bit Trade, must settle the imposed fine within 60 days, in addition to covering court expenses. The court determined that Bit Trade neglected its obligations regarding design and distribution, and functioned as an unlicensed credit facility.

The penalty is far less than the 20 million AU$ ($12.8 million) sought by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), which Justice Nicholas described as “excessive.” However, it exceeded Bit Trade’s request to limit the fine to 4 million AU$ ($2.5 million), which the judge said was “insufficient.”

A Kraken representative shared their gratitude for the court acknowledging their attempts at compliance, yet expressed disappointment regarding the final decision in this particular case, as reported to CryptoMoon.

Kraken stated, “This situation underscores the immediate requirement for tailor-made cryptocurrency regulations to tackle the issues leading to perplexity and doubt among Australian cryptocurrency investors and entrepreneurs. We strongly feel that these decisions impede economic expansion in Australia.

In September 2023, Justice Nicholas supported ASIC’s lawsuit against Bit Trade. He ruled that Bit Trade provided a “margin extension” service which enabled users to trade cryptocurrencies or fiat with leveraged trading, but failed to carry out the legally mandated Target Market Determination (TMD).

As a researcher, I’d express it this way: “Ensuring the right audience for our offerings is crucial to prevent investors from receiving unsuitable products that might cause them harm. This was emphasized by ASIC Chair Joe Longo in his December 12th statement.

As a crypto investor myself, I’d like to share some concerning figures about our community Down Under. According to Longo, around 1,100 Australians have used this particular platform, collectively paying over $7 million in fees and interest. Heartbreakingly, they collectively lost an additional $5 million, with one investor suffering a staggering loss of nearly US$4 million.

Longo stated that this result is quite important. In fact, it marks the first time ASIC has imposed a penalty on a company for not having a Terms of Market Engagement (TMD) in place. This serves as a warning to digital asset companies to be mindful of their regulatory compliance responsibilities.

According to Nicholas’ statement, he found Bit Trade’s violations to be significant and driven by the intention to boost profits.

He mentioned that the margin extension was provided “with no regard for local corporate law” until the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) took action.

Once Bit Trade learned that ASIC demanded a Technical Marketing Document (TMD) for their product, they decided to either prepare the TMD or restrict the offering of the product to professional or institutional clients, as mentioned by Nicholas.

“Instead, it continued to offer the Product to retail clients,” he added.

In a recent declaration, Longo stated that the regulatory body considers numerous cryptocurrency offerings already fall under existing legal jurisdiction.

As a researcher, I emphasize the importance of crafting these products with care, ensuring they are tailored for the ideal consumer groups. This way, we can guarantee that Australians are provided with suitable safeguards.

Deposit risk: What do crypto exchanges really do with your money? 

Read More

2024-12-12 10:00