Bitcoin Shaken: Wall Street’s New Puppeteer 🎭

by

In the labyrinths of Wall Street, Robbie Mitchnick, the crypto maestro at BlackRock, proclaimed that Bitcoin’s trajectory has irrevocably shifted. No longer tethered to the whims of miners, its fate now dances to the tune of exchange-traded funds-ETF, for the uninitiated. The hallowed “halving cycles,” once the heartbeat of Bitcoin’s rhythm, are now but a faint whisper in the cacophony of ETF-driven demand. 🎶

ETF Inflows: The New Leviathan 🐋

“It’s not over,” Mitchnick declared, dismissing the notion that the latest sell-off signifies Bitcoin’s demise. “This is the fifth cycle,” he mused, “and each time Bitcoin has soared higher than before.” Yet, he delivered a stinging rebuke to those clinging to halving events as Bitcoin’s metronome: “At this point, the halving is almost irrelevant. ETF inflows dwarf it-many, many times over.” 🪙

Mitchnick’s narrative places Wall Street firmly at the helm of Bitcoin’s future. BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF, IBIT, has shattered records, growing faster than any ETF in history. But the real story, he argued, lies not in assets under management but in the shifting cadre of holders. Initially dominated by retail investors, IBIT now sees nearly half its holders from wealth advisory and institutional channels. 🏦

The institutional embrace, though nascent, is broadening. “Family offices, asset managers, sovereign wealth funds-they’re all dipping their toes,” Mitchnick remarked. Yet, he cautioned, adoption remains sparse. Position sizes hover between 1% to 3%, with correlation being the linchpin. One pension CIO, he recounted, is “literally” watching Bitcoin’s correlation metrics. If it behaves like “digital gold” rather than a leveraged tech stock, it’s a “slam dunk” for portfolios. 📊

Despite this, Bitcoin’s short-term gyrations remain distinctly “crypto.” Mitchnick pointed to October 10’s $21 billion liquidation event as a leverage-fueled frenzy, contrasting it with the stoic ETF buyers who barely flinched. “ETF outflows? Tiny,” he scoffed. This divergence, he argued, underscores why cycles will attenuate-ETF capital absorbs shocks without panic exits. ⚡

He dismissed claims that Bitcoin’s underperformance against gold in 2025 undermines its “uncorrelated hedge” thesis. Bitcoin surged from the high $60s to over $100,000 in late 2024, even peaking at $126,000 before October’s crash derailed momentum. Year-to-date results, he insisted, reflect sequencing and leverage, not a structural flaw in Bitcoin’s value proposition. 📈

On supply dynamics, Mitchnick acknowledged early holders taking profits at psychological levels but rejected the notion of Bitcoin being in an “IPO moment.” Ultra-early investors, whose cost basis is $100 or $500, naturally trim positions at $100,000. “At some point, you take chips off the table,” he quipped, advocating patience over short-term leveraged trading. 🎲

He tempered expectations of universal adoption, citing central banks as tail-risk buyers rather than base-case participants. The near-term path instead winds through pensions, insurers, and sovereign wealth funds, whose conviction hinges on Bitcoin’s medium-term behavior and policy clarity. 🏛️

Mitchnick’s advice for allocators navigating their first ETF drawdown was blunt: “Don’t mistake derivatives noise for broken fundamentals.” Bitcoin, he argued, remains 65% of the crypto market cap for a reason-most tokens, he warned, “are or will be totally worthless.” 💣

The ultimate test for Bitcoin, he concluded, lies in whether it behaves as institutions expect. “People must look beyond short-term moves,” he urged, “and focus on medium and long-term performance.” As of press time, BTC traded at $105,497. 🕰️

Read More

2025-11-12 07:14