Bitcoin’s Censorship Crisis: A Multisig Scandal! 🚨

by

Ah, the noble Bitcoin, once a bastion of freedom, now ensnared in a web of multisig machinations! 🧠💸 Enter Luke Dashjr, sage of Bitcoin Knots, who dares to propose a hardfork so audacious, it would make a monk blush. 🤡

Behold, the plan: a trusted multisig committee, wielding the power to retroactively edit the blockchain-like a scribe with a quill and a grudge! 📜🔥 Their noble aim? To erase Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), a cause as virtuous as a nun’s prayer. Yet, the question lingers: who shall guard the guardians? 🕵️‍♂️

A hardfork, you say? A grand upheaval where nodes must either upgrade or risk becoming relics of a bygone era. 🔄✨ But lo, the true conflict lies not in code, but in ideology: Bitcoin Knots vs. Bitcoin Core, a clash of titans as ancient as the hills. 🏔️

The Multisig Mirage

Leaked whispers reveal Dashjr’s scheme: a quorum of sages to “cleanse” transactions, replacing harmful data with zero-knowledge proofs. A trick as old as the hills, yet dressed in the garb of progress. 🧙‍♂️

Dashjr, ever the enigma, declares, “Bitcoin dies or we trust someone!” A choice as tempting as a tavern’s ale. Yet, where is the trust? In a committee? A council of sages? 🤷‍♂️

The Peril of Permission

Experts scoff, warning that such power could birth a world where KYC and AML reign supreme, and Bitcoin’s “permissionless” dream crumbles like a sugar cube in a storm. 🌩️

When confronted, Dashjr retorts, “You write of lies!” A denial as flimsy as a paper crown. 🎩

The Ongoing Farce

Thus, the debate rages: how to balance law, governance, and the sacred principle of censorship? A conundrum as perplexing as a riddle posed by a jester. 🤖

Read More

2025-09-26 11:40