ETF issuer Osprey wants judge to review its failed suit against Grayscale

by

💸💥 ETF Issuer Osprey Tries to Ruffle Grayscale’s Feathers… Again! 💸💥
ETF issuer Osprey wants judge to review its failed suit against Grayscale

Oh, the drama that unfolds in the hallowed halls of Connecticut’s Superior Court! Osprey Funds, that plucky ETF issuer, has asked the esteemed Judge Mark Gould to take another gander at his decision to hand a resounding win to Grayscale Investments in their $2 million unfair trade suit kerfuffle.

It seems Osprey filed a motion for reargument on Feb. 10, claiming Judge Gould’s Feb. 7 ruling came “before the close of discovery” and, well, got a bit too big for its britches by expanding the scope of an exemption under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act. Ah, the plot thickens!

As you may recall, Osprey sued Grayscale and Delaware Trust Company, the trustee of its flagship spot Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded fund (ETF), back in January 2023. They alleged that Grayscale was a bit of a fibber, falsely advertising the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC), which allowed it to be the belle of the ball.

Osprey claimed Grayscale presented the conversion of its trust into an ETF as “a foregone conclusion, when it knew that access was never likely to happen.” Ah, but Judge Gould wasn’t having it, siding with Grayscale and saying that Osprey’s suit involved accusations about buying and selling securities, which is exempt from the act.

His ruling added that at the time of Osprey’s suit, it and Grayscale “were the only two asset managers in the marketplace of opportunities for trust-based products offering ticker-based exposure to Bitcoin.” Ah, the thrill of the chase!

A year after the suit, in January 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved GBTC’s conversion to an ETF after it lost in court against Grayscale. Osprey said in July 2024 that it would settle its claims against Grayscale for just under $2 million, which Grayscale didn’t take. Ah, the thrill of rejection!

Osprey said in its Feb. 10 motion that Judge Gould’s ruling overlooked the differences between how the Federal Trade Commission and Connecticut courts treat deceptive advertising and how the FTC and courts treat securities transactions covered by Connecticut and federal securities laws. Ah, the nuances of the law!

“The limited implied exemption from CUTPA for claims based on ‘securities transactions’ has never been applied, as the Decision implicitly applied it here, to claims arising from deceptive advertising between competitors merely because they do business in the securities, asset management, or cryptocurrency industries,” Osprey wrote. 🤔

Osprey and Grayscale weren’t part of “any ‘securities transaction’ with each other,” it added, and argued its claims aren’t about a securities transaction “being deemed fraudulent, deceptive, or otherwise actionable between the parties to it.” Ah, the plot thickens!

“Rather, Osprey’s claims focus on the extent to which Grayscale’s unfair competition, based on deceptive advertising, diverted market share from Osprey,” the firm’s lawyers wrote. Ah, the drama!

Last month, Osprey flagged plans with the SEC to convert its Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) into a spot Bitcoin ETF after a deal to be acquired by rival Bitwise fell through. Ah, the twists and turns!

X Hall of Flame: Bitcoin $500K prediction, spot Ether ETF ‘staking issue’— Thomas Fahrer

Read More

2025-02-11 09:09