Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 Proves Sometimes Dead Really Is Better (Review)

by

The Five Nights at Freddy’s franchise is incredibly popular and widely available, so it’s surprising that the movies haven’t captured the same appeal. While the first film was a box office success and led to a sequel, the recent release of Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 highlights a key problem: the games were more engaging than the films. The games succeeded with their unique style and mysterious stories, relying on sudden scares. However, even with the original creator heavily involved, the movies haven’t been able to recreate that magic.

Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 largely repeats the formula of its predecessor, aiming for bigger and more intense scares, animatronics, and story details. While the first film was profitable, this sequel relies too heavily on simply adding more content. The biggest issue is that the movie’s plot feels forced and overly convenient, with a weak script that easily falls apart under scrutiny.

This movie feels like a frustrating sequel because the characters don’t have clear motivations or goals – they just move from one scary situation to the next. While the actors do a good job with what they have, and the animatronic effects are still impressive, it’s not enough to overcome the film’s fundamental flaws and save Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 from being a disappointing experience.

Rating: 1.5 out of 5

PROS CONS
Practical effects are solid Script is awful, making characters unbearable
The scares are non-existent
It has no ending

Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 Goes Deep on Lore, For Better and Worse

The sequel to Five Nights at Freddy’s quickly revisits the events of the first film, and interestingly, starts with a promising idea: exploring the lasting emotional impact on the characters. The story introduces Abby, who misses the haunted animatronics, and shows Vanessa still struggling with the truth about her father. Mike is caught in the middle, simply trying to help everyone move on. This focus on character trauma is a rare approach for horror sequels, and briefly suggests this film might be different. Unfortunately, the movie quickly falls into a familiar trap: introducing yet another Freddy Fazbear’s location, complete with another vengeful ghost.

This is where Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 really starts to fall apart. The confusing storyline prevents the interesting ideas introduced early on from being developed properly. Characters appear briefly, then the scene shifts to someone else, leaving most moments feeling pointless and drawn out. The problem isn’t just weak writing—it also gives the actors very little to work with.

The movie’s script leaves Hutcherson appearing confused and unsure of his character’s purpose. While Lail is somewhat enjoyable, particularly in frightening moments, her character feels underdeveloped and confusing overall. Matthew Lillard delivers a strong performance despite limited screen time, and is a highlight of the film. Unfortunately, he doesn’t appear much. Those hoping for a meaningful reunion with Skeet Ulrich will be let down, as he’s only in one brief, easily replaceable scene.

Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 Fails in All-New Ways From the First Movie

Okay, so Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 has the same issue as the first film: it can’t quite decide what it wants to be. It swings wildly between being goofy and trying to be genuinely scary, and it doesn’t really pull off either effectively. There’s a sweet spot where humor and horror can work together – either by making you laugh before a scare, or relieving tension after – but here, those tones clash. It’s jarring, and honestly, it makes it hard to connect with the characters because you’re never sure if you should be laughing or jumping. The film just feels tonally confused.

The movie does get one thing right: a moment where the scary and funny elements actually work well together. The scene where the character Toy Chica gets her first victim is a good mix of humor, over-the-top acting, genuine fright, and violence. Unfortunately, it’s just one good scene in a movie that’s over an hour and forty minutes long, so it’s easy to blink and miss it.

The biggest problem with Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 is that it doesn’t really have an ending. You can say this without spoiling anything because the movie doesn’t follow any character arcs or build towards a final resolution. It simply stops without offering a conclusion to the story. However, despite this abrupt finish, it’s clear the filmmakers are setting things up for Five Nights at Freddy’s 3.

Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 Has Almost No Tricks Up Its Sleeve

While Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 is mostly uninteresting, there are a few brief moments that are actually enjoyable, like the quick glimpses of the Marionette moving around. Honestly, only two scenes in the movie really work well, and both heavily reference elements from the video games. The first involves Vanessa trying to deal with her deceased father in a dream, revisiting her childhood home and confronting his ghost to overcome her fears – a scene many fans will recognize as similar to the setting of FNAF4. It’s one of the few parts of the film where the direction, story, and scares all come together effectively and make sense for the character.

One of the most engaging parts of the movie is when it directly references the Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 game. Mike is trapped in a security room without a door, and his only defense is a Freddy mask. The film effectively uses elements from the game, creating suspense. However, this sequence – and much of the second half of the movie – suffers from choppy editing. The story jumps between different characters and situations without a smooth transition or clear reason, disrupting the flow and ultimately weakening what could have been a truly compelling scene.

Okay, let me tell you about Five Nights at Freddy’s 2. It feels like the filmmakers just assumed they knew what fans wanted, and honestly, the screening I saw was full of cheers – which, I guess, means it might be a slight improvement over the first film for some. But come on, we should expect more from a big adaptation like this. It’s easy to just give the audience exactly what they anticipate and throw in a quick cameo, but where’s the risk? Where’s the attempt to do something new with the material? Sadly, if you’re hoping for a genuinely interesting or even mildly scary experience, you’re going to be really let down. It plays it incredibly safe.

https://comicbook.com/movies/news/disney-is-planning-to-release-competition-to-five-nights-at-freddys-2-with-fan-favorite-franchise/embed/#

Read More

2025-12-04 19:12