Is Hyperliquid the New King of Fees, or Just Another Hype Train? 🚂💸

by

In the ever-evolving theater of decentralized perpetual futures trading, a new protagonist has emerged: Hyperliquid, affectionately dubbed HYPE. Launched in the winter of 2024, this ambitious venture has crafted its own Layer-1 blockchain, boldly surpassing Solana in the grand contest of 7-day fees. Who knew that fees could be so thrilling? 🎢

But what, pray tell, is propelling this meteoric rise? And how does our dear HYPE stack up against Solana’s native token, SOL? A question for the ages, indeed!

At the heart of Hyperliquid’s allure lies its perpetual futures DEX, a veritable playground for traders seeking up to 50x leverage on BTC, ETH, SOL, and other assets. With a fully on-chain order book and the audacity of zero gas fees, it stands in stark contrast to Solana, which, while hosting a cornucopia of decentralized applications (DApps), seems to have forgotten the art of trading efficiency.

Hyperliquid: A Centralized Paradise or Just a Fee Machine?

Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE, made its grand entrance via an airdrop in November 2024, charming 94,000 unique addresses. This distribution led to a staggering $2 billion market capitalization on day one—talk about a warm welcome! However, not all are singing its praises. Critics, like the ever-vigilant LawrenceChiu14, have raised eyebrows at the level of centralization, noting that a hefty 78% of the stake is under Hyperliquid’s watchful eye. 🧐

In a dazzling display of financial prowess, Hyperliquid raked in $12.6 million in weekly fees, outshining Solana ($11.8 million), Tron ($10.2 million), and Raydium ($9.8 million), as reported by DefiLlama. For context, Solana took a leisurely three years to reach the same milestone, while Raydium required a mere 18 months. Talk about a fast track! 🚀

Yet, one must ponder the implications of Hyperliquid’s fee efficiency, boasting a mere $638 million in Total Value Locked (TVL)—half of Raydium’s $1.25 billion and a mere fraction of Uniswap’s $4.22 billion. Uniswap, the reigning champion of DEXs, earned a staggering $22.8 million in the same timeframe, but its higher TVL only serves to highlight Hyperliquid’s impressive margins.

Another point of contention arises from the whispers of a centralized API and a closed binary source, as noted by the astute KamBenbrik. These matters warrant careful scrutiny before we crown HYPE as the king of the hill.

Hyperliquid’s Buybacks vs. Solana’s DApp Wonderland

A key differentiator in this saga is Hyperliquid’s fee structure: all fees are reinvested into the community, funding HYPE buybacks and liquidity incentives, as per its documentation. In contrast, Solana’s fees are scattered across its ecosystem, with protocols like Jupiter and Raydium each surpassing $10 million in weekly revenue. Thus, direct comparisons to Solana’s base layer may be as misleading as a magician’s trick. 🎩✨

With a market cap of $6.7 billion—outpacing Uniswap ($4.7 billion) and Jupiter ($1.8 billion)—Hyperliquid faces its share of challenges. Token unlocks are set to commence in December 2025, potentially putting pressure on HYPE’s price. Additionally, 47 million HYPE tokens are slated for distribution to core contributors in the first half of 2026, representing a staggering $940 million at current valuations. Talk about a hefty gift basket! 🎁

Hyperliquid’s ascent also casts a shadow over Solana, as some of its top DEXs, including Jupiter and Drift Protocol, venture into the realm of derivatives trading. While Solana enjoys deep integration with major Web3 wallets like Phantom and Solflare, along with a diverse DApp ecosystem featuring yield aggregators and liquid staking,

Read More

2025-02-28 01:30