Jurassic Park’s Stupidest Mistake Nailed by Expert, 32 Years Later

by

After three decades, Jurassic Park continues to be one of the most outstanding science fiction horror films that vividly portrays the dangers associated with human overconfidence. Detailed assessments only serve to amplify the catastrophe’s severity. John Hammond, despite being surrounded by advanced technology, failed to take a moment to ponder the potential consequences of his relentless pursuit of his personal ambition. If he had done so, perhaps he would have given more thought to the price tag of his shortcuts and lack of readiness before diving headfirst into his dream.

During a conversation with Chris Killian from ComicBook, Matt James, Colossal Bioscience’s Chief Animal Officer, shared the major hurdle that caused the downfall of John Hammond’s vision. Lamenting the common theme in sci-fi films where “innovative technology is portrayed as inherently evil and destined for misuse,” James demonstrated his expertise by pinpointing the mistake made by Hammond’s team: they failed to adequately consider the potential risks and consequences of their groundbreaking work.

Let me share some thoughts on Jurassic Park briefly. The construction was lavish, but it was constructed in a hurricane-prone area that depended on electric fences for safety without any backup power source! Quite convenient indeed. As an animal care expert, my first suggestion would be to construct cement walls to contain everything and then use electric fences as an additional measure to prevent animals from escaping. Lastly, I’d ensure that all systems had a redundant backup power supply.

It’s important to note that the plan for the raptors involved keeping them within concrete walls, but when the power fences on top of these walls malfunctioned (due to Nedry), they managed to escape. However, it’s crucial to remember that the pen was intended as a temporary solution; the novel explains that the raptors were housed in this pen while their enclosure was being reinforced. In essence, taller walls would have sufficed to keep them contained, as demonstrated by the Indominus Rex enclosure in Jurassic World.

As a cinephile, I must confess that had the backup generator been part of the plot in “Jurassic Park”, our hearts might not have raced quite as much. The thrill of watching chaos unfold would have been replaced with scenes of monotonous power supply.

However, it’s hard to deny James’ point – why wasn’t this potential solution ever considered? If a reliable backup system had been in place, the dinosaur-filled adventure might have taken a different turn, leaving us viewers yearning for more action-packed escapades. But alas, we can only imagine what could have been!

Real-Life “Jurassic Park” Expert Opinion Is Devastating For One Original Character

In considering Jurassic Park’s security system and James’s expert testimony, it seems reasonable to direct criticism towards Robert Muldoon (played by Bob Peck), who was responsible for both park safety and the animals’ wellbeing. As a pessimist who feared the raptors even in their reinforced enclosures, one might expect him to advocate for more robust and straightforward precautions. However, it’s possible that he did propose such measures but faced resistance from the park’s true antagonist?

Essentially, Muldoon was just a manifestation of Hammond’s broader problem – a lethal mix of unrealistic hope and neglect towards crucial figures such as Nedry, despite his claims of sparing no expenses. It’s not surprising that he overlooked essentials like backup generators or reinforced walls to conceal the exhibits: he had no reason to anticipate the terrors his vision could bring forth. Instead, Hammond sought companions who were as optimistic as him, which was evident in his frustration towards the “litigious lawyer” being the only one to stand with him.

What Colossal Tech Will Be in The Next Generation of Sci-Fi Films

James additionally discussed Colossal’s collaborations with prominent Hollywood film studios and their plans for involvement in forthcoming productions. Subsequently, James detailed the anticipated technological advancements that could feature in future dystopian science fiction films.

In the process of creating Exodiff, or artificial womb technology, it’s likely that narratives will emerge about how humans are utilizing this technology in ways we hadn’t considered before. These stories might explore the concept of surrogacy, where parents aren’t physically carrying their own children during pregnancy. It could lead to discussions about the emotional bond between mothers and their offspring when they are no longer directly involved in the pregnancy process. However, it is important to note that this paraphrase does not imply or suggest that mothers who use this technology will stop loving their children. Instead, it opens up a conversation about potential changes in family dynamics due to technological advancements.

As a movie enthusiast, I must confess that one aspect often overlooked in films like Jurassic Park is the belief that a private entity could undertake something as audacious as reviving extinct species, such as dinosaurs, without any regulatory supervision. The truth is, Colossal operates within a heavily regulated environment, with numerous bodies including the USDA, US Fish and Wildlife, FDA, and EPA playing significant roles in our day-to-day operations. It’s essential to remember that the government’s influence extends far and wide across everything we do, and Hollywood tends to brush this aspect aside.

Perhaps he’s suggesting that the true Jurassic Park was the government, which overlooked regulating what Hammond did? It certainly sparks thought. For further details, check out Colossal’s work on their official website.

Looking for the latest buzz in geek entertainment? Make sure to add us as your preferred source in Google – FIND US HERE.

https://comicbook.com/movies/news/jurassic-park-characters-ruined-jurassic-world-movies/embed/#

Read More

2025-09-07 21:40