Mark Cuban slams Gary Gensler’s crypto rules: ‘The problem is not us, it’s you’

  • SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda calls for clear rules for crypto asset disclosures.
  • Mark Cuban and Ethereum co-founder critique SEC’s unclear crypto regulations.

As an experienced financial analyst, I believe that the ongoing debate between regulatory bodies like the SEC and crypto industry leaders like Mark Cuban and Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin highlights the urgent need for clear-cut rules and disclosures in the rapidly evolving digital asset space.


Wealthy businessman Mark Cuban has yet again spoken out publicly against Chair Gensler’s approach to cryptocurrency regulations.

Taking to X (formerly Twitter), Cuban said, 

“Crypto companies aren’t reluctant to register, but rather, the regulatory framework isn’t a good fit for their unique business models.”

He added, 

“If no one can register, the problem is not us.  It’s you.”

Mark Cuban’s dissent

The basis for Cuban’s comments was a statement issued by SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda on June 1st. He highlighted the need for “re-registration” in the case of Index-Linked Annuities and Registered Market-Value Adjustment Annuities.

In a post on X (previously known as Twitter), Alexander Grieve, the Government Affairs Lead at Paradigm, shared his rationale for finding the subject matter intriguing.

As a researcher studying regulatory developments in the cryptocurrency space, I’ve come across an interesting observation. In his footnotes, Uyeda suggested an update to form S-1 to better align with cryptoassets’ distinct traits – a proposal that, as far as I’m aware, marks the first time he has publicly advocated for a customized disclosure framework specifically designed for crypto assets.

Mark Cuban slams Gary Gensler’s crypto rules: ‘The problem is not us, it’s you’

Taking a dig at SEC Chair Gary Gensler, Grieve noted,

“The SEC under a different admin would be a very different place.” 

As a researcher studying securities filings, I can tell you that potential issuers, including asset management firms like BlackRock and VanEck, submit S-1 forms or Registration Statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when they plan to offer or sell securities. These documents provide essential information about the issuer and the securities being offered, enabling investors to make informed decisions.

The enclosed documents provide a detailed explanation of the fund architecture, investment management, and operational aspects of the proposed ETF (Exchange-Traded Fund) product.

The ongoing dispute with Gensler has brought attention to the SEC’s inconsistent approach towards regulating cryptocurrency companies. However, it is noteworthy that the SEC has yet to offer clear-cut guidelines on cryptocurrency regulation.

Buterin joins the fray

It’s worth mentioning that Cuban wasn’t alone in holding this perspective. Similarly, Vitalik Buterin, a co-founder of Ethereum [ETH], also shared this viewpoint.

As a cryptocurrency analyst, I’ve noticed that one of the most perplexing aspects of regulation in this field, particularly in the US, is the paradoxical nature of securities laws. It seems that if you create something with little or no inherent value, you can operate with relative freedom. However, if your goal is to provide transparency and certainty for customers regarding returns and associated rights, then you may find yourself labeled as a security and subjected to stringent regulations.

How will this affect Biden?

This isn’t the first time Cuban voiced against Chair Gensler.

At the Coinbase State of Crypto Summit 2024, he expressed concerns that Gary Gensler’s actions could potentially harm President Joe Biden’s prospects in the upcoming elections.

As the United States presidential election draws near, it will be intriguing to observe if the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sheds light on cryptocurrency regulations. Failure to do so could potentially influence President Biden’s reelection bid in 2024.

Read More

2024-07-02 15:04