Mark Gatiss’s ‘Bookish’: A Fresh Detective Drama That Leaves You Wanting More!

by

A star rating of 4 out of 5.

It’s quite clear, given his body of work, that Mark Gatiss has a deep affection for detective novels.

In Sherlock, it was clear that the series added an exciting twist to Arthur Conan Doyle’s stories, yet at its core, it served as a heartfelt tribute to the genius of the original author and his beloved character.

The affection that Gatiss has for this genre shines particularly brightly in his newest work, titled Bookish, which undoubtedly serves as a heartfelt labor of love for both the author and the performer.

In an unusual turn of events, Gatiss ventures independently in this project. He’s not tied to any intellectual property such as Doctor Who or Dracula, nor is he working with his past partners like Steven Moffat or the League of Gentlemen.

It’s not surprising, given the circumstances, that this appears to be a unique perspective, coming from an author eager not just to explore a genre and its conventions, but also to innovate and bring something fresh to it.

In an era overflowing with detective dramas on television, nearly to the brim, it’s truly remarkable how Bookish manages to distinguish itself, offering a welcome respite that feels refreshingly unique.

Instead of merely producing the series, Gatiss not only acts but also assumes the role of Gabriel Book, a proprietor of an antiquarian bookstore set in 1946 London, in the series titled Bookish. And trust me, there are more “book” references to come once you start watching this show!

The bookstore could be an essential resource for Book during his investigation to uncover clues, serving as a kind of central hub for the series. However, our focus is not on observing his regular store activities but rather on witnessing him apprehend some criminals.

Because Book seems to devote most of his time to another endeavor – aiding the police in solving intricate crimes that are particularly cunning.

In every pair of episodes, a single mystery unfolds, and at the beginning of the series, an intriguing character named Jack (Connor Finch), a recently released prisoner, enters the scene. Book and his wife Trottie (Polly Walker) are drawn to him for some enigmatic reason, and they decide to hire him for work in their shop.

In the beginning, we discover an important aspect of Book and Trottie’s union: although they were close friends, their relationship was what is known as a “lavender marriage.” This means that Book was secretly homosexual during an era when it was illegal, while Trottie sought relationships elsewhere.

One of Gatiss’s most shrewd moves in designing the show’s foundation is setting up Book as an ally of the police from the start. This allows for an existing partnership between Book and Elliot Levey’s Inspector Bliss, eliminating the need to frequently rehash how Book becomes involved in a crime or arrives at a scene. By minimizing unnecessary conflicts, the narrative flow is smoother and more efficient.

In simpler terms, this implies that we delve deeply into each mystery promptly, giving ample time for their resolution within the two episodes that span each one.

In the mystery genre, this particular structure isn’t novel, yet it effectively delivers in this case. Mark Gatiss skillfully exploits the suspenseful moments for maximum impact, and intersperses it with sufficient surprises and turns to maintain engagement.

In the meantime, we delve deeper into the characters’ personalities within each enigma, rather than just focusing on their interactions with the victims. We also explore their circumstances beyond these interactions.

This aspect holds significant relevance considering the specific timeframe. Notably, Gatiss is not only intrigued by solving mysteries, but he has a particular fascination with delving into the post-war era’s implications for British society. Every character and location contributes to this inquiry.

Generally speaking, the framework is sound, yet it’s common for stories in weekly murder mysteries to lack sufficient attention and appear somewhat underdeveloped in their overall narrative.

This might be interesting mainly due to the intense nature of the material provided. The storyline involving Jack and his ties to the Books seems captivating, yet it appears rushed. On the other hand, the portrayal of Book’s homosexuality and his relationship with Trottie provides a deep emotional layer, though more development in these areas would be appreciated.

Additionally, certain characters, particularly Sergeant Morris, portrayed by Blake Harrison, and Nora, played by Buket Kömür, have rather limited roles within the storyline.

Both of them are skilled actors, but unfortunately, their talents seem underutilized in this production. Instead of playing substantial characters, they frequently serve as decorative elements to flesh out the setting, rather than characters who contribute significantly on their own.

The content seems a tad excessive – it appears that Gatiss is overflowing with topics he wishes to discuss in this piece, and his mind is brimming with creative ideas. However, there could be just one or two more than what’s suitable for a six-part series, given the need to adhere to some conventional genre elements.

Setting everything else aside, it’s quite apparent that Bookish excels for several reasons, with the most striking being its distinctive tone.

Gatiss truly understands the atmospheric nuance that suits a show like this. Given your familiarity with the Bookish, Gabriel Book bookstore setting, it’s clear you’re referring to a series that isn’t focused on portraying the grim realities of a murder’s impact on a community in a harsh or gritty manner. Instead, it likely emphasizes other aspects, such as the charm and quirkiness of the bookstore and its characters.

This story leans towards the end of the spectrum where murders serve as intriguing mysteries rather than evoking strong emotions. It’s not quite like typical cozy crime stories we’re familiar with – instead, it echoes the style of Agatha Christie, with a hint of Hercule Poirot’s detective work throughout.

Occasionally, due to its quirks and certain characters reminiscent of the ’40s, one might think it leans towards satire. But it’s important to note that it never fully crosses that line into actual parody.

It skillfully navigates the balance, ensuring that each episode brims with humor, levity, and subtle nods to the viewers, all while maintaining the gravity of the profound, personal narratives it addresses.

Additionally, it’s worth noting that Gatiss takes center stage in this production, making it feel incredibly personal and tailored to his unique style. One can’t help but wonder if another actor could have delivered such a captivating portrayal.

Without a doubt, the character exhibits some peculiar traits – from his exaggerated pipe-smoking habit to his distinctive rapid speech pattern. He embodies the archetypal television detective, yet manages to do so in a way that feels endearing and respectfully reminiscent of past portrayals, rather than falling into tired cliches.

As a film critic, I must say that the lead detective in this series isn’t your typical gruff, hard-boiled character. Instead, there’s a cool aloofness about him that sets him apart from his predecessors. He remains something of an enigma, yet each episode offers a tantalizing glimpse into his complex personality, gradually revealing more about him as the story unfolds.

It seems there may be some ambiguity regarding the shooting sequence, but occasionally, it gives the impression that Gatiss is simultaneously discovering the character of Book and growing increasingly confident in his choices, which might explain why each decision appears well-considered.

It’s not just him doing excellent work here; Walker, Finch, and Levey all excel in their roles, and the scripts ensure they receive proper recognition. Their characters become just as essential to the show’s atmosphere as Book does, resulting in a rich, well-rounded world that isn’t solely focused on one individual.

Gatiss and his team have gathered a remarkable group of guest actors, including Joely Richardson, Daniel Mays, and Paul McGann. Each one will bring their characters to life within each separate mystery. Their acting talent significantly enhances the entire show, making it stand out when compared to other contemporary detective series.

The visual appeal of the program significantly enhances its impact, as top-notch production design creates a highly engaging and immersive experience.

As a cinephile who’s got a soft spot for Mark Gatiss and detective dramas, I can confidently say that “Bookish” is right up my alley. While it may offer some unexpected depth in exploring the emotional journeys of its characters and societal issues of the time, it primarily sticks to the familiar genre conventions rather than attempting a groundbreaking transformation.

In this case, it indeed excels. The series is remarkably engaging and introduces a captivating new television detective, intricately designed mysteries, and an enthralling perspective of post-war London.

This does not disappoint at all. The show is incredibly gripping and offers us a fresh TV detective, skillfully woven plots, and a compelling glimpse into post-war London life.

To put it simply, one of the main criticisms about the first season lies in the fact that certain aspects and personalities seem not fully utilized – especially given that we’re aware that another season is planned, which could address this concern.

I’m optimistic that if Gatiss remains engaged for the long term, we might have numerous additional seasons ahead of us. It certainly seems this series has the potential to continue indefinitely.

Read More

2025-07-16 02:36