Powell Survives! 🤯 Fed Meetings Remain Secret

by

A peculiar challenge to the sanctum of Federal Reserve policy, presented as a ‘lawsuit’ – though one suspects a rather theatrical performance – by the Azoria Capital enterprise. It seemed a fleeting shadow, this attempt to pierce the veil of closed-door deliberations, a whisper against the granite edifice of established order. One wonders if those submitting such petitions truly believe in their efficacy, or merely seek a momentary flicker of attention in the vast, indifferent expanse of public discourse. A bit like shouting into the wind, no? 🌬️

The Murmurs Silenced: Transparency Denied at the Federal Reserve

It transpires, in a procession of events that border on the… whimsical, that Chairman Powell’s inner circle remains shrouded in mystery. The exchange-traded fund progenitor, James Fishback, a character of intriguing ambition, appears to have launched this legal volley on July 24th. A young man, a dropout, fond of pronouncements, and apparently, of a certain former President. One detects a pattern of… exuberance.

(Mr. Fishback, alongside a familiar figure. The correlation, one assumes, is left to the discerning observer. A tableau of… aspiration?)

Azoria, it is alleged, took umbrage at the Federal Open Market Committee’s preference for privacy, invoking the spirit – though perhaps misinterpreting the letter – of the 1976 Sunshine Act. A noble intention, certainly. But Judge Howell, a woman of, shall we say, pragmatic temperament, deemed the FOMC outside the act’s jurisdiction. And not without a touch of acerbic commentary, suggesting this legal endeavor was less about transparency and more about… marketing. The audacity! To use the courts as a promotional vehicle! 🎭

“The courts, you see, are rather occupied,” the Judge is reported to have observed, with a dryness that could curdle milk. “Employing them for commercial promotion is… frowned upon.” One can almost hear the sigh. 😌

This, however, is not Mr. Fishback’s debut in the arena of legal contention. It appears he previously engaged in a dispute with his former employer, Geenlight Capital, contesting, amongst other things, the accuracy of his former job description. A ‘head of macro,’ he claimed. Geenlight begs to differ. One suspects the truth resides somewhere amidst the shifting sands of perception.

(Mr. Einhorn, observing the proceedings with what appears to be… guarded amusement. A silent witness to the unfolding drama.)

Further adding to the narrative, Mr. Fishback seemingly exaggerated the magnitude of his financial achievements at Geenlight. A claim of “over $100 million in profits”, swiftly refuted by the firm’s legal team. A touch of embellishment, perhaps? A poet’s license applied to the realm of finance?

“Absolutely no authority,” the countersuit proclaims, with a satisfying degree of finality. “No responsibility for profits.” A stark pronouncement.

Meanwhile, within the walls of the Federal Reserve, the committee convenes. To cut rates, or not to cut rates? The question hangs in the air, a silent echo of broader economic anxieties. The current President, one notes, offers his own… forceful suggestions. Mr. Fishback, a devotee of the Department of Government Efficiency – a name redolent of bureaucratic fervor – echoes the President’s sentiments.

“If they are merely private citizens,” he posed in a recent online missive, “shouldn’t they be arrested for trespassing?” A delightfully provocative thought. And then, the grand finale: “Maybe we just lower the rates ourselves.” 🤪 A vision of radical directness.

Read More

2025-07-30 07:28