No one would have guessed that Guy Busick would become known for such violent and shocking scenes. He didn’t grow up loving horror, but became a fan after watching the 1996 film Scream. Later, he and R. Christopher Murphy teamed up to create the darkly comedic horror film Ready or Not, where a bride named Grace (played by Samara Weaving) is hunted by her new husband’s family, who worship the Devil, in a spectacularly bloody showdown.
As a horror fan, I’ve been consistently impressed with Guy Busick’s work. He really hit his stride bringing back the classic Scream formula with the fifth and sixth films – even if it meant saying goodbye to some beloved characters. What I appreciated was how he upped the ante with three Ghostfaces causing chaos in those installments. He’s clearly versatile, though, moving from that slasher vibe to the fun, gothic energy of Abigail and even revitalizing the Final Destination series with what’s become its strongest entry. And just when you thought he was done, he returned to Woodsboro for Scream 7, again partnering with James Vanderbilt on the story. This time, we saw Neve Campbell back as Sidney, alongside a compelling new character in her daughter, Tatum, facing off against a particularly brutal Ghostface. It’s clear Busick understands what makes these franchises tick and isn’t afraid to keep things fresh.
In a recent interview with ComicBook, director Busick discussed major plot points for Scream 7, including details about Sidney Prescott’s family, the return of Stu Macher, memorable kills, and the identity of Ghostface.
I got into horror through Scooby-Doo! What first sparked your interest in the genre?
That’s a great question! The first thing that comes to mind is Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” video. It really scared me as a kid – I think I was around 7 or 8 when it came out. I quickly realized that the best way to deal with being frightened by something, whether it was a movie or a video, was to learn everything I could about it. I researched how they created the special effects, like the werewolf transformation, and that helped me feel better. I figured, ‘Okay, I understand how it’s done, so I’m not scared anymore.’ I didn’t really grow up watching horror, but my co-writer on “Ready or Not,” R. Christopher Murphy (we grew up together and he’s a big horror fan), introduced me to the genre when we were in junior high.
I didn’t really get into horror until I saw Scream. It was a surprise to my family and friends, since I’d never been a fan before. That movie just clicked for me, and I started watching all the classic horror films I’d missed. It’s a genre that consistently delivers, and there’s a ton of fantastic horror being made right now. It’s also great to see horror movies doing so well in theaters!
Now that Neve Campbell was returning for Scream 7, how did that influence the story you decided to tell?
We’d always hoped to focus a story around Sidney, and we were so happy Neve Campbell agreed to return. We presented the idea to her, and she loved it. From there, we collaborated with her closely throughout the filmmaking process. The main question driving the story was: what does Sidney’s life look like now that she’s a mother, especially with a daughter the same age she was during the original events? We really wanted to explore the challenges and complexities of their mother-daughter relationship—how they’d navigate conflict and ultimately rely on each other to get through a difficult situation. That emotional connection was at the heart of the film.
Early buzz heralded the return of Stu, Roman and Dewey. How did you land on this all-star reunion?
The idea of bringing Stu back was present from the very start of the project. I don’t recall who initially suggested revisiting previous Ghostface killers Sidney had faced, but we also really wanted to include David Arquette as Dewey. Stu was always intended to be part of the plan. While I didn’t come up with the specific way he returned – that was James’ idea – I immediately loved it. I’ve always been a fan of the character, as the original character famously says, and I consistently explored ways to bring Matthew Lillard back in that role. However, it always felt like a letdown if Stu was secretly still alive, as I didn’t want to diminish the impact of the first film.
There was some discussion about whether Stu could still be alive, but it never felt quite right to me. While I’m relieved Stu Macher is truly gone, it was a fun opportunity to surprise fans and give them a different take on the character. Matthew Lillard clearly enjoyed reprising the role – he fell right back into it. I finally got to write dialogue for Stu, even if it wasn’t the original character. We were fortunate to have Laurie Metcalf, Scott Foley, and David Arquette return as their past Ghostface characters, and I wish we’d been able to use them more. It felt like the right approach. Bringing Stu back was meant to really get under Sidney’s skin, forcing her to confront her past, her decisions, and what her life truly means. It fit the overall theme to have him reappear at the end, adding another painful twist.
Jill isn’t here, which makes you wonder if it was because of Emma Roberts’ schedule. Or, is it possible Jill is actually still alive, and we’ve been seeing Ghostfaces who were already dead?
I have no idea about Emma or whether anyone contacted her. I also care about Jill, but her death was very clear – it wasn’t just the defibrillator. Sidney actually shot her in the head, which is a much more conclusive ending than what happened with Stu.
This movie really relies on nostalgia, with scenes that strongly remind viewers of earlier Scream films. What was the reason for deliberately evoking those familiar feelings?
I definitely get caught up in nostalgia sometimes, but I also think it can be harmful if you dwell on the past too much. A little bit is okay, but it can become toxic, almost like the killers in Scream 5. They were fixated on the Stab movies and felt betrayed by the latest one, so they tried to create a real-life event for Hollywood to turn into another Stab film. It’s a commentary on how fandom can become unhealthy – something many of us in the entertainment industry can relate to, since we’re fans ourselves and have strong feelings about the things we love. Ultimately, the movie was really about the pitfalls of getting too caught up in nostalgia.
Jessica, the person behind everything, desperately wanted Sidney Prescott to remain frozen in time – to stay exactly as she remembered her. It highlights this strange connection some people feel with celebrities – actors, musicians, innovators… We put these people on a pedestal, admiring them. Sometimes, we don’t want them to change or grow; we just want them to keep being what we expect. Jessica needed Sidney to continue being the strong survivor who defeats villains – that was her entire identity in Jessica’s mind. But Sidney had moved on. She wanted a normal life with her family and business, leaving her past behind and stepping out of the public eye. She’d shared her story in a book and felt she was finished with that chapter. Ultimately, this is a story about someone unable to let go of the past and who takes that obsession to a dangerous level.
We also wanted to give fans those familiar, nostalgic moments they love – like recreating the iconic scene of Billy Loomis entering Sidney’s bedroom, but with a new spin. This time, Sidney is the one behind the door. Those scenes were a lot of fun. However, it’s important not to rely on nostalgia too much, or it just feels like we’re trying to please people without substance. It’s a delicate balance, and we hope we’ve struck it right. We definitely enjoyed including those callbacks, though.
Sidney’s daughter is named Tatum, a tribute to Sidney’s close friend from the original Scream movie. Does introducing a character with that name suggest a new ‘final girl’ will be central to the story?
Whether things will continue to go smoothly is still uncertain. But the important takeaway from this story is that Tatum is now ready to handle whatever challenges life brings, and that’s a truly satisfying conclusion. What happens next is a separate story, and we won’t be discussing it.
I found it really powerful that their difficult relationship was repaired through this ordeal, and that the cycle of trauma could stop with Tatum. She ultimately just wanted to be strong and capable, like her mother, and she is now. In the last scene, Sidney tells Tatum she always hoped Tatum would be strong, but didn’t want her to suffer as she did. Tatum responds by acknowledging that some things are unavoidable, given their family’s history, and that they need to be prepared to face whatever comes next.
There’s some creative kills. Which one stands out?
One of my favorite moments is definitely Gale running down the first Ghostface with the van. We usually don’t reveal the killer halfway through a Scream movie, and I was really pleased we did that. I’d always wanted to subvert expectations and create a genuine ‘Who is that?’ moment, pushing the boundaries of the formula. It was a lot of fun to break the rules like that. And, of course, the multiple deaths of Jessica at the end – the constant headshots were memorable.
Director Kevin Williamson mentioned in an interview that the show needed more intense and graphic violence. He specifically wanted to know which killings should be made more violent and bloody.
I really have to give Kevin all the credit for how the movie turned out. I wrote the first few drafts with his help, and we developed the story together. When I started working on Ready or Not 2, I passed on what was basically a complete script, but he took it in some really unexpected – and fantastic – directions. Reading his drafts was amazing; he came up with things only he could, and they were brilliant and shocking. He definitely upped the ante with some of the kills. It was a lot of fun watching the footage come together, seeing the cuts and special effects. It’s definitely a bloody movie, but you have to remember the original Scream started with Drew Barrymore’s incredibly graphic death! People say this one is too much, but it’s always been a part of what makes the franchise fun.
Fans love to analyze who Ghostface killed and how. Do the scripts actually go into that level of detail? Is all of that planned out beforehand?
I’m not really sure about this, we’ll have to work it out as we go. I can take a guess, but Kevin took over the details at some point, so things changed after I was involved. You’d need to ask him directly about number 7. However, I definitely know who committed the murders in episodes 5 and 6, and can tell you about each one.
Some deaths are pretty clear-cut. Like when Lucas is stabbed by the bar tap – Jessica simply couldn’t have done that herself.
Yeah, and it’s also her own son. That would be particularly cruel.
She didn’t seem that fond of him anyways.
That would have been a really difficult task for her, going above and beyond what she’s capable of. It would have taken someone with Marco’s strength and physical ability to manage the logistics and actually lift and position him like that. She simply couldn’t have done it.
Patrick Dempsey was considered to return as Mark in Scream 3. However, when his schedule didn’t allow it, did the filmmakers simply replace him with Joel McHale in the same role?
We originally intended for the character in Scream 3 to be named Mark, but it’s a common name. The decision was solidified when Sidney mentions in Scream 5 that she’s married to a Mark during a phone call with Dewey. From there, it felt natural to make the character someone in law enforcement. Once we cast Joel as Mark, we tailored the role to highlight his acting abilities, and he delivered an amazing performance, showcasing a wide emotional range. I was really excited to help give him such a great part.
I’ve always been a big fan of his, so it was great to see him play a character who was both funny and strong – a good father, a dedicated police officer, and someone genuinely charming. I really hope the character returns! It’s amazing when an actor completely embodies a role – you initially might not picture them in the part, but by the time you see the movie, you can’t imagine anyone else playing it. It’s a special feeling for a writer when that happens.
What do you think? Leave a comment below and join the conversation now in the ComicBook Forum!
Read More
- When Is Hoppers’ Digital & Streaming Release Date?
- 4 TV Shows To Watch While You Wait for Wednesday Season 3
- 10 Movies That Were Secretly Sequels
- Sunday Rose Kidman Urban Describes Mom Nicole Kidman In Rare Interview
- Best Werewolf Movies (October 2025)
- 10 Best Pokemon Movies, Ranked
- All The Howl Propaganda Speaker in Borderlands 4
- 10 Best Anime to Watch if You Miss Dragon Ball Super
- Did Churchill really commission wartime pornography to motivate troops? The facts behind the salacious rumour
- Seeing is Believing: Imaging All Spins in a Quantum Simulator
2026-03-11 17:13