SEC has taken ‘too expansive’ a view of crypto, says former commissioner

As a researcher with experience in securities regulation, I find Troy Paredes’ remarks at the TokenizeThis 2024 conference thought-provoking. His concerns about the SEC’s expansive view of what constitutes a security under the Howey test resonate with me.


During his tenure as a commissioner at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) from 2008 to 2013, Troy Paredes expressed concerns that the regulatory body might be extending its reach too far in determining which digital assets fall under the category of securities.

At the TokenizeThis 2024 conference in Miami on May 9, I, as an analyst, reported that Paredes mentioned SEC Chair Gary Gensler appeared to express clear views regarding the definition of a security under the Howey test during his speech. Nevertheless, he highlighted that the SEC was yet to address a significant issue – the jurisdictional aspect concerning digital assets.

“Paredes explained that if an entity doesn’t fall under the definition of a security according to securities laws, then it falls outside the SEC’s jurisdiction. The commission, in Paredes’ opinion, has adopted a broad interpretation of what qualifies as a security based on the Howey test.”

SEC has taken ‘too expansive’ a view of crypto, says former commissioner

As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed that many people, both inside and outside the SEC, seem to be preoccupied with determining whether certain tokens qualify as securities. However, they’re not giving enough attention to how we can adjust the existing regulatory framework to effectively govern digital assets. There is a significant amount of ambiguity among firms trying to adhere to regulatory guidelines in this rapidly evolving space.

Critics argue that the SEC has adopted a “enforcement-driven regulatory approach” towards crypto companies providing tokens or services to U.S. citizens. The commission has initiated lawsuits against Binance, Kraken, and Ripple, and reportedly plans to take enforcement action against Robinhood following the issuance of a Wells notice.

As a researcher exploring the regulatory landscape of digital assets, I’ve noticed that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken actions that have sparked reactions from various lawmakers aiming to limit the commission’s jurisdiction over these assets. On May 8, a significant number of representatives in the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution intending to reverse an SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin concerning banks holding customers’ digital assets. However, President Joe Biden has announced his intention to veto this bill.

Read More

2024-05-09 22:47