Solana not comparable to Terra Luna: Justin Bons clears FUD

  • Justin Bons defended Solana’s economic design, dismissing comparisons to Terra Luna’s collapse.
  • Despite bearish trends, MACD signaled potential bullish momentum for Solana’s price recovery.

As a seasoned analyst with over two decades of experience in the financial markets, I have seen my fair share of market fluctuations and project comparisons that sometimes lack merit. In the case of Solana [SOL], I find Justin Bons’ perspective on its economic design to be quite insightful and well-grounded.


Despite the overall surge in the cryptocurrency market, Solana (SOL) experienced a decline of 2.21% over the past 24 hours. This dip occurred as the total market capitalization of all cryptocurrencies increased to $2.07 trillion, registering a growth of 0.65%.

However, there were some growing concerns over SOL’s economic framework.

Concerns surrounding Solana

Critics have made comparisons between Solana and Terra Luna, a blockchain initiative that faced collapse in 2022.

According to Justin Bons, founder and CIO of Cyber Capital, these worries or fears have been considered unwarranted and overblown by him.

In response to the growing rumors and concerns,  Bons stated,

The design of Solana’s economy is top-notch. Its long-term inflation rate is 1.5%, and half of the base fee generated is burned, creating scarcity. This setup, with tail inflation promoting long-term sustainability and burning ensuring scarcity, is ideal. The concerns about Solana’s economics being fear-mongering are unfounded.

What’s more to it?

Bons clarified that the economic structure of SOL operates along traditional lines, sharing similar foundations with established blockchains such as Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH).

In the initial phases of numerous blockchains, such as Solana (SOL), there’s typically an extended period of higher-than-normal inflation rate. This inflation rate eventually diminishes progressively – a strategy often employed intentionally in the creation of many digital currencies.

Bons notes that the economic structure of Solana resembles Ethereum’s following its EIP-1559 update, as it includes methods to regulate inflation by eliminating transaction fees through burning.

Is the Terra Luna comparison justified?

Bons believes Solana’s token economics are sound and not comparable to Terra Luna’s collapse. 

He added, 

In essence, the primary distinction lies in scalability – SOL can expand, while ETH cannot at this point. Based on my argument, I believe that in the long term, a scalable platform offering lower transaction fees would attract significantly higher revenue due to its capacity to accommodate more users.

Regarding the distribution issues of SOL tokens, Bons pointed out that Solana’s forthcoming token releases offer more advantages over other rising blockchain platforms like Aptos, Sui, and Sei.

He said, 

The chains in question possess much larger impending releases, and their distribution patterns lean heavily toward insiders, which is starkly different from SOL. Consequently, the intense criticism against SOL doesn’t align with the present situation.

He concluded the argument by emphasizing his point when he said,

The design of SOL has a sound economic structure; failing to acknowledge this is akin to burying one’s head in the sand!” (Or more casually: “SOL’s economic setup is pretty solid, ignoring that fact is like sticking your head in the sand!”)

SOL’s price action explained

Despite some worries, Solana’s price progress hasn’t been impressive, according to the RSI, which stays below the neutral point, suggesting a downward market movement or a bear market.

On the other hand, the MACD presents a somewhat contrasting scenario; the MACD line is seen above the signal line, implying that positive momentum prevails, which could potentially indicate a pathway towards recovery.

Solana not comparable to Terra Luna: Justin Bons clears FUD

Read More

2024-09-19 09:44