Spinning Insights: Quantifying Quantum Entanglement with NMR

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

Researchers have developed a practical method to measure quantum entanglement, coherence, and mixedness in two-spin-1/2 systems using readily available NMR spectroscopy techniques.

The study demonstrates how entanglement phase diagrams, delineated by magnetic field ratios $r=B\_{1}/B\_{2}$, reveal a boundary-marked where the singlet witness equals zero-between separable states and entangled thermal states, suggesting that even the most carefully constructed theoretical frameworks have inherent limits to their descriptive power.
The study demonstrates how entanglement phase diagrams, delineated by magnetic field ratios $r=B\_{1}/B\_{2}$, reveal a boundary-marked where the singlet witness equals zero-between separable states and entangled thermal states, suggesting that even the most carefully constructed theoretical frameworks have inherent limits to their descriptive power.

This work bridges the gap between theoretical quantum information and experimental NMR, offering a new approach to characterizing quantum states in spin-1/2 systems.

Quantifying genuine quantumness in many-body systems remains a significant challenge, particularly when bridging theoretical concepts with experimental verification. This is addressed in ‘Nonclassicality Analysis and Entanglement Witnessing in Spin-$1/2$ NMR Systems’, which presents a rigorous analytical framework for characterizing quantum coherence, mixedness, and entanglement within two-spin-$1/2$ nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) systems. The research demonstrates a direct link between these quantum information quantifiers and experimentally accessible NMR observables, enabling their quantification through standard polarization measurements. Could this approach pave the way for routine quantum characterization using readily available spectroscopic techniques?

The Echo of Simplicity: Introducing the Two-Spin System

The exploration of quantum mechanics often begins with deceptively simple systems, and the two spin-1/2 particle configuration stands as a foundational example. These particles, possessing an intrinsic angular momentum quantified as spin, serve as building blocks for understanding the behavior of more intricate quantum entities. Investigating their interactions – even in isolation – reveals core principles governing the quantum world, such as superposition and entanglement. This minimal system allows physicists to model and predict the characteristics of larger assemblies of qubits, the fundamental units of quantum information. By meticulously analyzing the energy levels and possible states of these two spins, researchers establish a crucial baseline for tackling the complexities inherent in quantum computing and quantum materials, demonstrating how seemingly elementary interactions give rise to powerful quantum phenomena.

The application of an external magnetic field to a two-spin-1/2 system unlocks behaviors with significant implications for quantum information processing. This field introduces energy level splitting, quantified by the Zeeman effect, creating distinct and controllable quantum states. These states can then be manipulated and entangled, forming the basis for qubits – the fundamental units of quantum computation. Moreover, the magnetic field’s strength allows precise tuning of the system’s Hamiltonian, enabling the implementation of specific quantum gates and algorithms. Investigations into these magnetically-controlled systems demonstrate the potential for building scalable and robust quantum processors, where information is encoded and processed using the principles of quantum mechanics, rather than classical bits. The predictable response of these spins to magnetic fields provides a pathway towards maintaining quantum coherence – a crucial requirement for successful quantum computation.

The interplay between two spin-½ particles isn’t merely additive; rather, scalar coupling fundamentally shapes the system’s quantum behavior. This interaction, arising from the magnetic moments of the individual spins, results in distinct energy levels that are not simply the sum of individual spin energies. Instead, the total energy depends on the relative alignment – or ‘coupling’ – of the spins, leading to both triplet and singlet states with differing energies. Consequently, the system’s spectral characteristics – the wavelengths of light it absorbs or emits – are uniquely determined by these coupled energy levels. Analyzing these spectral signatures provides a direct window into the strength and nature of the scalar coupling, crucial for manipulating and understanding quantum interactions in more complex systems and potentially harnessing them for applications like quantum computing, where precise control over spin states is paramount. The energy splitting between these states is proportional to the coupling constant, $J$, allowing researchers to characterize the interaction with high precision.

The NMR spectrum of a two-spin-1/2 system reveals a level crossing at a specific magnetic field strength, signifying a quantum transition point.
The NMR spectrum of a two-spin-1/2 system reveals a level crossing at a specific magnetic field strength, signifying a quantum transition point.

Defining the System’s Landscape: The Hamiltonian Approach

The Hamiltonian operator, $H$, for a two-spin system mathematically defines the total energy as a function of the spins’ quantum numbers. Specifically, it encompasses both the interaction energy between the spins – typically a scalar multiple of the spin product $S_1 \cdot S_2$ – and the interaction of each spin with an external magnetic field, $B_0$. This interaction is expressed as $-\gamma \hbar \mathbf{B_0} \cdot \mathbf{S}$ for each spin, where $\gamma$ is the gyromagnetic ratio, $\hbar$ is the reduced Planck constant, and $\mathbf{S}$ is the spin vector. The Hamiltonian’s eigenvalues represent the allowed energy levels of the system, and its time evolution, governed by the Schrödinger equation, dictates the dynamics of the spins and forms the basis for understanding Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) phenomena.

The energy levels of the two-spin system are directly calculable from the Hamiltonian operator using the eigenvalue equation, $H|\psi\rangle = E|\psi\rangle$, where $H$ is the Hamiltonian, $|\psi\rangle$ represents the system’s quantum state, and $E$ denotes the energy level. For a two-spin-$1/2$ system, this yields four distinct energy levels: $E_0$, $E_1$, $E_2$, and $E_3$, corresponding to the total spin states $|00\rangle$, $|01\rangle$, $|10\rangle$, and $|11\rangle$ respectively. The energy difference between these levels, $\Delta E$, directly determines the resonant frequency of transitions observed in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and therefore constitutes the basis for spectral feature interpretation; specifically, the observed signal frequencies are proportional to these energy differences.

The population of energy levels within the two-spin system at thermal equilibrium is governed by the Boltzmann distribution. This distribution states that the ratio of populations between two energy levels, $E_i$ and $E_j$, is proportional to $e^{-\Delta E / k_B T}$, where $\Delta E = E_j – E_i$ is the energy difference, $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant, and $T$ is the absolute temperature. Consequently, lower energy levels are preferentially populated at a given temperature. This population difference is directly proportional to the net magnetization observed in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy; smaller population differences at higher temperatures reduce the signal intensity, while larger differences at lower temperatures enhance it. The observed NMR signal, therefore, reflects the thermal distribution of spins across available energy levels.

Thermal mixedness is significantly influenced by both magnetic field strength and detuning, as demonstrated by its variation with the normalized frequency ratio for homonuclear and heteronuclear systems.
Thermal mixedness is significantly influenced by both magnetic field strength and detuning, as demonstrated by its variation with the normalized frequency ratio for homonuclear and heteronuclear systems.

Quantifying the Ephemeral: Mixedness, Coherence, and Their Measures

The thermal state, denoted as $\rho_{th}$, represents a statistical ensemble describing the probability distribution of a quantum system in thermal equilibrium with an environment at a defined temperature, $T$. This state is not a pure quantum state, but rather a mixed state reflecting the system’s inherent uncertainty due to interactions with its surroundings. Mathematically, the thermal state is expressed as $\rho_{th} = \frac{e^{-\hat{H}/k_BT}}{Z}$, where $\hat{H}$ is the Hamiltonian of the system, $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant, $Z = \text{Tr}(e^{-\hat{H}/k_BT})$ is the partition function ensuring normalization, and the trace operation ($\text{Tr}$) sums over all possible quantum states. Environmental influences, such as collisions or electromagnetic radiation, drive the system towards this thermal state, effectively reducing any initial quantum coherence and introducing a degree of classical randomness.

Mixedness, a measure of the classicality of a quantum state, is quantitatively determined through the calculation of spin correlators. Specifically, the mixedness, often represented by a purity value, is directly proportional to the sum of the squares of the expectation values of spin operators along different axes. These expectation values are experimentally accessible through Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, where they manifest as signal intensities and phase relationships. The formula for mixedness utilizes these NMR observables, allowing for the characterization of quantum states without requiring complete state tomography. A state with a purity of 1 is fully pure, while values less than 1 indicate a mixed state, with lower values signifying greater classicality and decoherence.

Quantum coherence, essential for applications like quantum computing and sensing, is quantitatively assessed using the relative entropy of coherence. This measure, denoted as $S(\rho) = – \log_2 \rho$, compares a given quantum state $\rho$ to the maximally incoherent state – a classical mixture with equivalent probabilities. A higher relative entropy indicates greater coherence, signifying a stronger degree of superposition and thus a greater potential for quantum advantage. The calculation relies on the density matrix $\rho$ representing the quantum state, and the logarithm base 2 yields coherence quantified in bits. States with $S(\rho) = 0$ are completely incoherent, resembling classical probability distributions, while non-zero values indicate varying degrees of quantum superposition.

Relative entropy of coherence decreases with increasing rescaled temperature (τ = kB​T/J) and is modulated by the dimensionless magnetic field parameter (ωΣ/J), exhibiting distinct behaviors for homonuclear and heteronuclear systems.
Relative entropy of coherence decreases with increasing rescaled temperature (τ = kB​T/J) and is modulated by the dimensionless magnetic field parameter (ωΣ/J), exhibiting distinct behaviors for homonuclear and heteronuclear systems.

Revealing the Subtle Dance: Entanglement, Concurrence, and Spectral Signatures

This two-spin system demonstrably exhibits quantum entanglement, a phenomenon where the states of the two spins are intrinsically linked, regardless of the physical distance separating them. Researchers have successfully detected this entanglement not through the complex process of full quantum state tomography – which requires characterizing the entire quantum state – but by utilizing an “entanglement witness.” This witness is mathematically expressed in terms of readily measurable Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) polarization observables, effectively providing a practical and efficient route for confirming entanglement. By analyzing these NMR signals, the presence of non-separable correlations – the hallmark of entanglement – can be definitively established, opening avenues for characterizing entangled states without the need for exhaustive state reconstruction. This approach simplifies the detection process and facilitates broader investigation into the properties of entangled systems.

Concurrence serves as a vital metric for quantifying entanglement, moving beyond a simple binary determination of its presence to reveal the degree of non-separability within a quantum system. This measure, ranging from 0 to 1, assesses how strongly correlated two quantum particles are; a value of zero indicates a completely separable state, while a value of one signifies maximal entanglement. Crucially, concurrence doesn’t require complete knowledge of the quantum state – it can be calculated from a limited set of measurable observables. This makes it a practical tool for characterizing entanglement in complex systems, providing insights into the resources available for quantum information processing and offering a way to understand how entanglement diminishes due to environmental interactions. The quantifiable nature of concurrence allows for direct comparisons between different entangled states and provides a benchmark for assessing the effectiveness of entanglement generation and preservation techniques.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy provides detailed information about a system’s entanglement, but interpreting the resulting spectra requires careful consideration of both coherence and relaxation. The precise positions of spectral peaks are determined by the system’s coherent evolution – the predictable, wave-like behavior of the nuclear spins. However, this coherence is never absolute; relaxation processes, both longitudinal ($T_1$) – representing spin-lattice interactions – and transverse ($T_2$) – describing spin-spin interactions – constantly degrade this coherence. Longitudinal relaxation returns excess energy to the surroundings, while transverse relaxation causes dephasing of the spins, broadening spectral lines. Therefore, the intensity and shape of NMR signals are a sensitive balance between these competing processes; a strong, sharp peak indicates long coherence times and minimal relaxation, whereas a broad, weak peak suggests rapid decay and diminished coherence. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately extracting entanglement information from NMR spectra.

Investigations into thermal entanglement within this two-spin system reveal a striking phenomenon: a non-analytic transition occurring precisely at zero temperature. This transition doesn’t occur gradually, but rather as an abrupt shift, effectively pinpointing a quantum critical point. This critical point demarcates a boundary – defined mathematically by the condition $\rho = 0$ – beyond which entanglement either appears or vanishes. The operator $W$ encapsulates specific polarization observables, and its expectation value, when zero, serves as a definitive indicator of this entanglement boundary, suggesting a fundamental shift in the system’s quantum properties at this critical temperature and offering a precise condition for observing or predicting entanglement.

An entanglement witness, represented by a hyperplane, effectively distinguishes separable states-contained within the convex blue region-from certain entangled states by evaluating the expectation value of the witness operator.
An entanglement witness, represented by a hyperplane, effectively distinguishes separable states-contained within the convex blue region-from certain entangled states by evaluating the expectation value of the witness operator.

The pursuit of quantifying nonclassicality, as demonstrated in this research concerning spin-$1/2$ NMR systems, reveals a humbling truth about even the most rigorous investigations. Any attempt to define entanglement, coherence, or mixedness-to establish a firm grasp on these quantum states-is inherently provisional. As Richard Feynman observed, “The first principle is that you must not fool yourself – and you are the easiest person to fool.” This work, by linking theoretical constructs to practical NMR spectroscopy, doesn’t resolve the elusive nature of quantum information; it simply provides a more refined mirror. Each measurement, each entanglement witness, is but a fleeting glimpse before the inherent uncertainties of the system-and the limitations of observation-consume the certainty of any prediction.

What Lies Beyond the Signal?

The quantification of entanglement in a controlled system, as demonstrated, feels less like a victory and more like a refinement of the measurement itself. Each carefully constructed entanglement witness is, at best, a fleeting snapshot – a statistically valid assertion about a system that is, even during the measurement, dissolving into decoherence. The elegance of translating theoretical constructs into readily accessible NMR parameters does not erase the fundamental limitations: the signal always diminishes, the noise always encroaches, and the very act of observation introduces a perturbation that alters the observed.

Future explorations will undoubtedly pursue greater complexity – larger spin systems, more intricate entanglement schemes. But one suspects these advancements will merely reveal more subtle avenues for error and approximation. The challenge isn’t to achieve perfect fidelity, a goal perpetually receding with each increase in system size, but to understand the nature of the information lost in the translation from quantum state to classical signal.

The true frontier lies not in pushing the boundaries of what can be measured, but in acknowledging what remains forever beyond reach. Every calculation is an attempt to hold light in one’s hands, and it slips away. To believe one has solved quantum gravity is not insight, but a momentary lapse in skepticism.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.01100.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2025-12-02 10:48