Star Trek Fans Can’t Believe All the Continuity Plotholes In One of the Franchise’s Most Beloved Episodes (But Does It Matter?)

by

When Star Trek: The Next Generation first aired in 1987, it faced high expectations. The Original Series had already become beloved by fans, and TNG needed to both honor the world created by Gene Roddenberry and establish its own following. The Season 2 episode “The Measure of a Man” was a turning point, signaling the show’s potential and its journey towards becoming a classic.

Despite being a fan favorite, the episode “The Measure of a Man” has some logical flaws. While praised for its dramatic courtroom setting, it raises questions about established Star Trek lore. The episode centers on whether Data deserves rights as a sentient being, but it seems odd that this hasn’t been decided already – Data had been a successful Starfleet officer for over twenty years and was even the second-in-command on the Federation’s main ship. Shouldn’t this issue have been addressed much earlier?

The Data Dilemma That The Next Generation Fans Are Still Debating

The episode takes an unexpected turn from a simple comment. As an admiral departs the bridge, he casually tells Picard that Commander Maddox will be working on Data, adding, “See to it.” This seemingly minor statement suddenly treats Data as if he’s just another piece of equipment, which feels wrong considering everything The Next Generation had shown us. Data didn’t just appear on the Enterprise – he’d gone to Starfleet Academy, served for 25 years, and earned a command position. That process would have involved thorough reviews, promotions, and psychological assessments. Surely, someone along the way would have acknowledged Data as an individual, or at least realized he wasn’t a typical Starfleet device.

This episode makes things worse by adding details to Maddox’s past. Data learns that Maddox rejected his Starfleet application, arguing he wasn’t truly aware. However, this also reveals that everyone else on the review board believed Data was sentient and qualified. Essentially, Starfleet already settled this issue years ago, making the current debate in the episode feel unnecessary and repetitive.

The legal proceedings seem to disregard Data’s established position and responsibilities as a Starfleet officer who commands others and is accountable for many lives. It’s also strange that no one in Starfleet recognizes him, considering he’s a unique figure – the first and only android to serve. If this were happening in reality, Data would be famous throughout the Federation. When Riker demonstrates that Data can be deactivated during the trial, the courtroom reacts with surprise, but it’s not particularly shocking; after all, any living being can be rendered unconscious or disabled.

Why the Inconsistencies in “The Measure of a Man” Don’t Really Matter 

Once you start finding flaws in this episode, it’s hard to stop. Nevertheless, “The Measure of a Man” remains one of the strongest episodes of TNG. While its placement in the timeline isn’t ideal – it probably would have made more sense if it happened earlier in Data’s career, when he was a cadet – the episode’s central philosophical questions still resonate if you can overlook that. It’s a bit like the TOS episode “The Galileo Seven,” where Spock unexpectedly acts as if he’s never led people before. Both stories might have been more effective as lessons for younger characters, but they still manage to work well.

Despite some plot holes, “The Measure of a Man” remains a powerful episode. Fans argue that sci-fi courtroom dramas aren’t meant to be legally perfect, and Star Trek often shows Federation officials acting on their own. In fact, many criticisms of the episode’s logic were already addressed by Picard within the story itself. The important thing is that Picard proved his point: Maddox was incorrect, Data’s freedom was secured, and those who doubted Data’s humanity were forced to reconsider. The episode successfully achieved its goal.

A memorable line from a previous Star Trek: The Next Generation episode states, “There can be no justice so long as laws are absolute.” While not a perfect legal argument, “The Measure of a Man” is a compelling story, likely because it was written by Melinda Snodgrass, who was a lawyer before becoming a Star Trek writer. Her legal background probably contributes to the story’s enduring relevance.

What do you think about this discussion? Do any of the conflicting points stand out to you? Share your thoughts in the comments and join the conversation on the ComicBook Forum!

https://comicbook.com/tv-shows/list/5-weird-star-trek-tv-series-plot-holes-i-still-cant-get-over-decades-later/embed/#

Read More

2025-10-27 01:13