What Happened To California’s 2020 Move To Put Health Records On Blockchain?

What Happened To California’s 2020 Move To Put Health Records On Blockchain?

As an analyst with a background in both technology and healthcare, I find the proposed use of blockchain technology for healthcare records during the Covid-19 pandemic intriguing. While the idea was ultimately not implemented due to privacy concerns and public backlash, it showcases the potential for this innovative technology in the realm of healthcare.


In August 2020, the Covid-19 pandemic reached its height. As a result, numerous countries imposed lockdowns, limiting access to various public areas for their citizens. Anticipation was high for vaccines announced by pharmaceutical companies, but the first U.S. dose wouldn’t be distributed until December that year.

Despite this, regional lawmakers and administrative bodies sought methods to control the illness outbreak whilst reopening the nation. The California legislature presented one possibility: securing citizens’ health data on a blockchain.

What Happened To California’s 2020 Move To Put Health Records On Blockchain?

As a researcher studying access control measures for various venues, I recommend collecting data on individuals’ coronavirus infection history and vaccination records. By doing so, we can ensure accurate and efficient screening processes. This information would be crucial in determining an individual’s eligibility to enter specific venues based on their vaccination status.

The lawmakers maintained that this action would allow specific businesses to reopen under restricted conditions, thereby reducing the risk of infection, and simultaneously granting immunized individuals the freedom to explore select locations.

Advocacy organizations contested that this action constituted a violation of citizens’ civil liberties. Adam Schwartz, legal counsel at the digital rights organization, Electronic Frontier Foundation, voiced concerns that such a measure would grant access to unauthorized individuals, including those lacking medical expertise, to private health records.

As a researcher studying the proposed legislation, I expressed concern over the bill’s potential implications, referring to it as a “disconcerting development.” I argued that this approach would disadvantage individuals who couldn’t afford frequent testing and emphasized the unique characteristic of blockchain, which does not allow for false diagnoses to be deleted or overlooked. Fortunately, public opposition prevented the bill from being enacted, but it did pave the way for intriguing possibilities in applying blockchain technology in novel ways.

Most individuals associate blockchain with cryptocurrencies – digital money systems, such as Bitcoin, which can be transferred between parties using wallets and bought through exchanges. However, the essence of blockchain lies in its function as a digital record-keeping system. Numerous cryptocurrencies serve as payment methods for accessing this distributed ledger’s services. Blockchain boasts features like anonymity, decentralization, security, and privacy.

These distinctive attributes have fueled the widespread adoption of cryptocurrencies as a preferred payment option across various industries such as gaming, gambling, retail, and real estate. For instance, Bitcoin casinos provide anonymity by allowing users to sign up without disclosing personal information, thereby enhancing privacy and security. Moreover, the underlying blockchain technology facilitates swift transactions, making it ideal for crypto-based gambling and e-commerce deals. Cryptocurrencies have expanded their reach beyond financial markets, enabling users to pay for travel expenses or even purchase cars, highlighting their increasing utility in our daily lives.

As a blockchain analyst, I’ve noticed that despite the uncertainty surrounding Covid vaccine records, the healthcare industry has been actively exploring the use of blockchain technology. The need for secure, accessible patient records is crucial in healthcare, yet maintaining privacy is paramount. Arika, a California-based tech firm, provides a solution through its blockchain platform. Instead of storing personal or healthcare data, their system authenticates and verifies information exchanged between patients and healthcare providers. By doing so, they contribute to the growing list of companies leveraging this groundbreaking technology for individual benefits.

In 2022, California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed bill AB 2004 relating to healthcare records, despite earlier criticism from the cryptocurrency sector for his rejection of a related bill aimed at expanding the industry’s use as an investment and transaction tool. Meanwhile, during the height of the coronavirus pandemic, he also rejected the proposal to utilize blockchain technology for sharing Covid records.

Simultaneously, he advanced a bill aimed at enabling the digital storage, transmission, and reception of personal documents such as birth and marriage certificates. This proposition would render it unnecessary for individuals to maintain physical copies of these records. Should the need arise to present them, they could effortlessly share the information on a blockchain network, thereby streamlining and expediting the process.

Read More

2024-07-03 15:12