What Went Wrong With Every Texas Chainsaw Massacre Sequel?

by

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre is a landmark horror film that has greatly impacted the genre, though its follow-ups haven’t lived up to the original. The 1974 film, directed by Tobe Hooper, powerfully reflected the anxieties of the Vietnam War era through a terrifying story about a cannibalistic family in the Texas countryside.

The original Texas Chainsaw Massacre feels disturbingly realistic, and remains terrifying even today. Though director Tobe Hooper returned 12 years later for The Texas Chainsaw Massacre Part 2, the sequel was a much more lighthearted and different film than the groundbreaking original.

The first movie was so scary and successful that it led to many sequels, but none of them lived up to the original. Even setting aside spin-offs and remakes, the core Texas Chainsaw films have always been a letdown. Leatherface is a potentially great villain, but the series as a whole hasn’t quite figured out how to deliver consistent scares.

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre Part 2 (1986)

The biggest problem with The Texas Chainsaw Massacre Part 2 was the editing. The sequel revisits the terrifying cannibal family as they harass a radio DJ while being pursued by a man seeking revenge for a past tragedy. Unlike the first film, Part 2 tries to be more humorous and lighthearted.

The sequel wasn’t a failure because of its tone—in fact, its satirical style is what makes it enjoyable. The movie cleverly pokes fun at horror sequels and offers a commentary on how horror films are made for profit. However, the editing process significantly hurt the film, as some scenes dragged on too long while others were cut short, ultimately weakening its impact.

It’s unlikely The Texas Chainsaw Massacre Part 2 will ever be fully appreciated, as there’s no director’s cut and the director, Tobe Hooper, is no longer with us. While the sequel was initially quite ambitious, its attempts at satire don’t really succeed. It’s probably the strongest film in the series after the very first one, but that isn’t saying much.

Leatherface: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre III (1990)

Following a sequel that strayed too far from the original, Leatherface: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre III went in the opposite direction. The film centers on a couple’s road trip that leads them to Leatherface and his dangerous family. Similar to the first movie, most of the terrifying events unfold around the family’s farmhouse, and it revisits many iconic scenes.

Leatherface had the potential to be a decent slasher film, but it was ultimately hurt by censorship. It originally received an X rating, which led to the removal of many of its most violent scenes. Even though the movie wasn’t great to begin with, the initial, uncut version never stood a chance, and the film failed with both critics and audiences. The censorship definitely didn’t help its chances.

The third film in the Texas Chainsaw Massacre series falls into a common trap for the franchise: it disregards previous storylines and largely retreads the plot of the original. While revisiting familiar territory might seem like a safe bet, Leatherface lacks the raw intensity and horror of the first movie, making it a fairly uninspired entry.

The Return Of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1995)

Even though The Return of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre starred two popular young actors, the movie wasn’t successful. It’s about a group of high school students on their way to prom who take a wrong turn and encounter a terrifying cannibalistic family in rural Texas. The film was finished in 1995, but wasn’t widely released until 1996 and 1997.

Describing The Return of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre is tough, because the final movie feels disjointed and confusing – like a bunch of puzzle pieces thrown together randomly. It was heavily edited, with scenes rearranged, cut, and trimmed without a clear purpose, ultimately making it more strange than frightening.

The movie tries to create mystery by hinting at a powerful, hidden group pulling the strings, but it just makes the plot more confusing. While it tries to be thought-provoking with dark humor, the editing completely destroys any potential for a deeper story. And because it’s not genuinely frightening, The Return of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre doesn’t really succeed as a horror film.

Texas Chainsaw 3D (2013)

Texas Chainsaw 3D tried to capitalize on the short-lived 3D trend, but unfortunately, it worsened the problems of an already struggling film series. The movie centers on a young woman who unexpectedly inherits a house in Texas and learns she’s connected to the infamous Sawyer family. It disregards the storylines of several previous sequels and generally ignores established continuity.

Following a passable remake and a weak follow-up, Texas Chainsaw 3D attempts to reconnect with the original series, but it doesn’t really make a difference. The film lacks thrilling scares and surprisingly tries to portray Leatherface as a sympathetic character. The 3D effects are pointless, and it’s obvious the filmmakers weren’t interested in honoring the legacy of the franchise.

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2022)

Recently, many older movie franchises are getting new sequels, and Netflix’s Texas Chainsaw Massacre is one of them. The film follows a group of young people who go to a deserted Texas town hoping to fix it up, but they accidentally bring Leatherface back to life, and he starts killing again. Notably, the 2022 movie completely ignores all the sequels that came before it.

Setting aside the predictable scares and low-budget feel, the latest Texas Chainsaw film doesn’t really have a clear point. While it tries to add depth by referencing darker themes related to its characters, the connection feels forced and almost disrespectful. Ultimately, the movie indulges in typical slasher-film violence but also awkwardly attempts to offer social commentary.

Updating the Texas Chainsaw Massacre series could have worked, but the new Netflix movie missed the mark. The original film was a powerful reflection of the 1970s, while the 2022 sequel just felt like a low-budget copy.

Read More

2025-12-14 16:37