Donald Trump isn’t doing Sean “Diddy” Combs any favors.
After three months of initially suggesting a potential pardon for the rap mogul if found guilty of his offenses, the president later acknowledged that some past interactions had significantly reduced the likelihood of him granting a pardon.
Trump told Newsmax’s Rob Finnerty on August 1 that, in essence, Combs was partially not guilty, although he remains incarcerated following his conviction on two out of five charges. Despite the initial impression of a win, it appears it was not as significant a triumph as it seemed.
In the past few years, our friendship had remained undisturbed, but it was during the 2020 presidential race that our amiable bond took a turn for the strained – that’s something I observed personally.
As I reflect on our past, I can honestly say we had a warm camaraderie. We clicked really well, and he appeared to be a genuine individual. However, our friendship wasn’t particularly deep. Yet, when I embarked on my political journey, his demeanor towards me took an unexpectedly hostile turn.
As a lifestyle expert, I understand the challenges we face as humans. We value clarity in our judgments, yet complex situations can cloud that perspective. For instance, when you have a positive relationship with someone, but they make statements that are hurtful or inappropriate. In such cases, it becomes tricky, to say the least. It’s not easy, I admit, but it does make navigating these situations more challenging.
Regarding what Combs stated concerning Trump (who was eventually found guilty of prostitution-related crimes but acquitted of sex trafficking and racketeering charges after a court trial lasting 29 days), what were his previous comments about Trump? Approximately one month before the 2020 election, he told Charlamagne tha God that in his opinion, Trump had done an “excellent job of stirring up America.
In an interview with Revolt TV, the founder of Bad Boy Records expressed a sentiment that “People like Trump, who are white men, should be removed from the situation.” He emphasized that such thinking is extremely harmful, as this individual threatened the safety of many people and their families by suggesting they should stand down when voting. The phrase he used was: “‘Stand back and stand by.’
He also stated, “We’re engaged in a battle between love and hostility.” What’s most crucial right now is working towards removing President Trump from his position.
For a deeper look into Combs’ legal battle, keep reading…
Following the acquittal of Sean “Diddy” Combs on charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking (previously associated with Cassie Ventura and an unnamed individual, referred to here as “Jane“), he was still found guilty of facilitating prostitution for both women. In response to these verdicts, the singer’s legal representative issued a statement.
The criminal proceedings initiated when our client Cassie Ventura bravely submitted her civil claim in November 2023, as stated by Douglas Wigdor in a July 2 statement to TopMob News. Although the jury didn’t convict Combs of sex trafficking Cassie, they found him guilty of transporting someone for prostitution. By sharing her ordeal, Cassie made a lasting impact on both the entertainment world and the pursuit of justice.
Highlighting the accusations for which Combs entered a plea of innocence, Wigdor remarked once more, “We stand firm—without any doubt—in our belief and backing of our client, who demonstrated remarkable bravery throughout this court case.
Additionally, Wigdor commended Ventura for her diligence, as she was among the 34 witnesses testifying throughout the 29-day trial of Combs.
He went on to say, “She clearly showed immense resilience, shining a light on the truth about influential men in our circle and their long-standing misbehavior, which has gone unpunished for years. This incident underscores that change is urgently needed, and we will relentlessly advocate for survivors.
After learning that he was found not guilty on three out of five counts in his federal trial, Combs, who could have faced life imprisonment if convicted on all charges, knelt and bowed his head over a chair in a manner reminiscent of prayer, as reported by NBC News journalists present in the courtroom.
As an overjoyed admirer, I can confirm that, according to the media, Combs’ family were present in the courtroom, applauding and cheering for the music mogul’s outcome. The defense team even shared a heartfelt embrace, while Combs himself hugged lawyer Brian Steel.
On July 2nd, the jury, consisting of twelve individuals, announced their verdicts regarding the five federal charges against Combs in his sex trafficking trial. The jurors, who had been deliberating for their third day, found him guilty on two counts associated with transporting individuals for prostitution. These two individuals were his former girlfriend, Ventura, and a woman known as “Jane.
In the court case, it was determined that Combs was not responsible for one charge of racketeering conspiracy and two charges related to sex trafficking; he had maintained his innocence on all counts.
On the eve of rendering their decisions, the jury informed U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian that they were unable to agree on the racketeering charge due to deeply entrenched opposing views. Judge Subramanian then urged the jurors to persist in their deliberations. A verdict was eventually reached following the commencement of deliberations the next day.
Attorney Christy Slavik devoted a total of 4 hours and 50 minutes to presenting her closing statements to the jury, during which she contended that Sean “Diddy” Combs wielded power, resorted to violence, and instilled fear in order to achieve his objectives.
1. “She remarked that he’s persistent, unwilling to accept a ‘no’,”
2. “She noted that he’s unyielding, never accepting a refusal,”
3. “She pointed out that he’s insistent, never taking ‘no’ for an answer,”
4. “She observed that he’s determined, never giving up on his requests,”
5. “She explained that he’s persistent, always trying to get what he wants.”
6. “She mentioned that he’s firm-minded, never accepting defeat or denial.”
7. “She commented that he’s relentless, never backing down from his desires,”
8. “She described him as resolute, never giving in to a ‘no’,”
9. “She noted that he’s persistent, always pushing for what he wants,”
10. “She underlined that he’s unyielding, never accepting a denial.”
As for the second sentence:
11. “It was his realm. All were there to cater to him,”
12. “He ruled over it all. They were all there to serve and obey him,”
13. “His rule extended over everything. Everyone was there to fulfill his demands,”
14. “He had authority over the entire place. Everyone was there to attend to his needs,”
15. “His dominion encompassed everything. All were there to serve and obey him.”
Slavik highlighted two instances: the 2016 physical attack against his former girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, as well as an alleged assault in 2024 involving a woman referred to as “Jane” during the court proceedings.
She stated that although these two events happened eight years apart, they aren’t individual narratives. Instead, they are distinct chapters in the same overarching tale – the story of Sean Combs and the criminal organization he oversaw, comprising members from his close associates.
Over and over again, this criminal operation catered to the defendant’s whims by employing a systematic approach involving threats, control, and deceit,” she went on. “The defendant believed that his secrecy, embarrassment, and influential status would shield him from legal scrutiny.
Slavik asserted that during this trial, Combs was assisted by a sizable team of personal staff, who were dedicated to fulfilling his every need, enhancing his influence, and safeguarding his image relentlessly.
In their court submission, the prosecution asked Judge Arun Subramanian to allow them to modify certain aspects of their arguments for attempted arson and kidnapping.
Despite Combs still grappling with charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, which involve accusations of kidnapping and arson, prosecutors stated in their June 24 letter that they have eliminated instructions from the charge concerning attempted kidnapping under both California and New York law, attempted arson under California law, and aiding and abetting sex trafficking.
The government expressed its expectation that making the language simpler not only helps in organizing instructions more efficiently, but also prevents any potential misunderstandings.
Combs told JudgeSubramanian that he will not take the stand during his sex trafficking trial.
In simpler terms, the judge underlined that neither the jury nor anyone else can infer or suspect your guilt simply because you chose not to testify.
Combs made it clear that his choice not to testify was entirely his own, as he had discussed the matter with his team earlier on.
I’ve given it careful consideration, and this is the choice I’ve made,” he told the judge, in simpler terms.
Teny Garagos, the lawyer representing Combs, informed the judge that both sides – his team and the prosecution – anticipate spending “at least four hours” each for their final statements in the case.
After Special Agent Joseph Cerciello from Homeland Security Investigations concluded his extensive testimony on June 24th, the defense is set to present their case. In contrast to calling additional witnesses, Combs’ legal team plans to concentrate on the evidence already presented in court.
On June 23, as Ceriello testified, the jury was presented with graphic footage, reportedly originating from Diddy’s “warm-ups,” which were subsequently admitted as evidence in court.
The special agent pointed out that there were 50 clearly labeled videos from both 2021 and 2022. During the trial, jurors were given access to two of these videos via headphones and screens for their review.
In the voicemails to his ex-chief of staff Kristina Khorram, dated June 23, Combs outlined particular demands he had while staying at a hotel in November 2021. These requests included replenishing baby oil, a product he frequently needed for his “freak offs.
He told Khorram, “Give me a call once you start heading over,” and added, “I can’t believe it! Fill this with 20 bottles.” (Paraphrased)
In response to Khorram’s request to extend the hotel stay for another day, she simply said, “Alright. You can find the baby oil outside your door.
As a die-hard fan, I’d rephrase it like this: In private texts, his ex-employee revealed she was readying an IV drip for both him and Jane, information that I later learned was utilized in at least one of his “freak off” recovery sessions, based on the group chat messages.
She also made sure that there were Plan-B pills, an emergency contraceptive, in his nightstand.
The jurors were presented with a sequence of text conversations between Combs and Ventura, in which the “Long Way 2 Go” singer openly discussed the impact that the alleged mistreatment was having on her.
In March 2017, Combs inquired if Ventura, whom he had an on-off relationship with from 2007 to 2018, was open to a temporary separation. She responded, “No, I don’t want to be mistreated for standing up or being defiant. You make me feel insignificant.
In another instance, she further accused her ex of physically assaulting her.
In this rephrased version, Ventura wrote: “I offer you love, but as soon as I take a moment’s break, you end up in trouble and then yank me down the hallway by my hair. This isn’t just playful banter anymore. Last night, I felt like I was already deceased, and it wasn’t happening to me because witnessing your radiance was so captivating.” Ventura was 30 years old at the time of this message.
Brendan Paul, who worked as Combs’ assistant from 2022 to 2024, testified that he bought illegal substances like marijuana, 2C, cocaine, ketamine, and ecstasy for his boss on several different occasions.
Paul described the process as exchanging messages with the drug dealer, who would then visit one of our homes. He met these individuals primarily through text messages or phone conversations.
However, Paul vehemently denied being a “drug mule” for the rap mogul.
On June 18, Judge Subramanian postponed the court proceedings for the rest of the day because one of the jurors was sick and couldn’t attend. There was no court session scheduled for June 19 as it was observed as Juneteenth.
The judge announced that one of our jurors is ill and couldn’t make it due to a condition called vertigo, which forced him to return home. We received notice from his partner, meaning he won’t be present today, and since he’s part of the regular jury, it seems like we can’t proceed with the trial today.
The judge pointed out that it’s uncertain if the juror’s sudden spell of vertigo, characterized by dizziness, nausea, headaches, and additional symptoms, is short-lived or a chronic condition. However, they will keep an eye on the development to ensure proper handling.
Since the court isn’t in session on June 19 due to Juneteenth, Judge Subramanian announced that the trial will pick up again with a brief schedule on June 20, lasting from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m.
Following Judge Subramanian’s decision to dismiss Juror No. 6 due to inconsistencies about their home address, another juror might be removed for an alleged discussion about the case with a previous co-worker. This potential offender has been called upon by the judge and asked to surrender their phone for examination, according to NBC News.
By the close of the court session on June 16, a determination regarding the member’s termination hadn’t yet been reached.
On June 13th, Kanye West showed up at a New York City courthouse to back up Diddy (Combs). The famous rapper known for his hit “Stronger” spent around half an hour inside the building but didn’t step foot in the courtroom. The principal room is designated for Combs’ family, legal associates, press, and individuals who line up for hours to secure a seat – it wasn’t meant for West.
Reflecting on recent events, I can’t help but remember the heated discussion that ensued upon my return from our joint adventure in vibrant Las Vegas with a fellow rap artist and his spouse.
During the trip, she testified that the situation resulted in observing sexual acts, as she had requested the services of Anton, a prostitute frequently engaged by her and Combs. In a hotel room, a number of individuals witnessed Anton having intercourse with a woman.
Jane communicated to Geragos, the lawyer for Sean Combs (also known as Puff Daddy or Diddy), that the hip-hop magnate felt aggrieved following allegations that she had been present at someone else’s “wild party.
21 days into the Combs’ trial, Maurene Comey, an assistant U.S. attorney, indicated that they aim to dismiss one juror from the panel of twelve.
In her conversation with Judge Subramanian before the jury arrived at the New York City courtroom, she expressed that they had significant reservations about including this statement in their letter. It seemed to them that it indicated a lack of honesty towards the court, which is a matter of great concern for them.
Defense lawyer Alexandra Shapiro, pointing out that Juror No. 6 is part of the trial’s racial minority group, requested a day or two to draft a response and review relevant legal precedents.
In response, Judge Subramanian stated that he would “set aside deciding the details” regarding the juror until a decision has been reached.
On June 10, there was a heated discussion between Jane and Garagos, during which he implied that the witness was involved in exchanging sexual favors for high-end items.
Lawyer Geragos reviewed text conversations between Jane and Combs from November 2021, where it appeared the witness expressed displeasure over Combs engaging in intimate relations with other women. According to the messages, she inquired of Combs if he had gifted the other woman a Chanel handbag following their encounter.
Jane said that she didn’t get a Chanel purse from Combs, telling Garagos that she “got trauma.”
When the attorney asked what a Bottega bag was, she replied, “I’m sure you have one.”
And when Geragos asked how much the item costs, Jane asked, “How much does my body cost?”
Jane was granted a 10-minute break following the exchange.
In approximately 2022, Jane stated that she thought Combs was someone who derived satisfaction from observing his partner engaging in physical intimacy with another person, having researched their relationship dynamics.
She explained that her study provided her with a greater insight, “I was simply delving deeper to grasp all the factors contributing to their joy when witnessing their partner with other men.
It’s possible that the witness proposed an explanation suggesting that Combs might be exploring his sexuality, as his preference for “hotel nights” seems remarkably similar to Ventura’s “freak offs.
She stated that some individuals who are labeled as ‘cucks’ might harbor genuine curiosity they feel uncomfortable exploring personally. Instead, they might employ a woman as a means to satisfy this curiosity, without actually participating directly.
In my line of work, I often come across fascinating characters, and Paul is one such individual. You see, Paul was an escort we sought out on numerous occasions, and I fondly referred to him as “Trifecta.” The reason behind this unique moniker lies in the captivating similarities between his performance and the basketball stars renowned for their successful triple-doubles.
“I was Kobe Bryant and Paul was Shaq [O’Neil],” she told jurors. “Combs was Michael Jordan.”
She characterized Paul as “very kind,” pointing out that if she were to engage in intimate relationships with escorts, it would be comforting to know that it was with someone who carried a positive and inviting aura.
Jane stated that the relationship between Combs and Khorram was a source of conflict in her romantic involvement with the hip-hop entrepreneur.
Jane mentioned that Khorram was often by his side. She found it challenging in their relationship as she felt strongly that her emotions significantly impacted the way Sean behaved towards her.
In my expert opinion, on June 10th, Judge Subramanian dismissed a request for a mistrial from Diddy’s legal team. They had presented an argument that Bryana Bongolan, along with another individual, falsely claimed that I (Diddy) had dangled them over a balcony on the 17th floor.
In their latest court filing, his legal team alleges that the prosecution acted unprofessionally by presenting false testimony, which they refer to as “misconduct.
The letter states that during this trial, the government has provided testimony that was either knowingly false or they should have known it was false regarding their claim that Mr. Combs hung Bryana Bongolan over the balcony of Cassie Ventura’s apartment in September 2016. Therefore, to prevent an unfair verdict in this case, the court should declare a mistrial.
Jane alleged that the rap mogul had beaten her for hours June 2024.
Jane stated that an argument ensued between her and Combs, stemming from him being seen with a woman significantly younger than himself (25 years). This situation reportedly led Jane to label him as a “predator” and forcefully push his head against a marble kitchen counter.
The woman testified that she concealed herself in the main bedroom, and Diddy (Bad Boy Records founder) started forcing open the door. (Evidence presented included photos showing the damaged door.) She claimed that as she tried to escape, he struck her on the back of the thigh with his foot, causing her to tumble down.
She explained to the prosecutor that he had pinned her down, held her in a headlock, and raised her off the ground. In this position, I couldn’t take a breath and found myself on my tiptoes. I was simply struggling to escape his grasp.
Jane shared that she dashed out of the house, concealed herself behind a nearby wall outside for roughly two hours, hoping he’d depart, but he chose not to. She went on to explain that they eventually made their way back to his residence, where she huddled in the backyard as a means of self-protection, since Combs is said to have assaulted her.
As stated by Jane, the argument intensified when it’s alleged that Combs began striking her repeatedly on the head. She testified that he kicked her as well, hurled abusive words, and continued to strike her without pause.
She alleged that he told her that she was “trying to take him away from his kids and his family.”
She declared, “I replied, ‘No, I’m not. Please go away. Go away. Stop it,'” she stated. However, he didn’t listen. Instead, he seized me by my arm and my hair, pulling me forcefully back towards the house…by my hair, by my arm.
Following the unfortunate incident, I personally noticed two lumps, roughly the size of golf balls, on my forehead and a darkened eye area.
In the aftermath of the alleged attack, I observed two swellings about the dimension of golf balls on my forehead along with a discolored eye region.
Jane stated that Homeland Security conducted a raid on her home, which was one of several properties owned by Combs and purchased in March 2023, according to her claims. She disclosed that agents arrived at her residence, prompting her to contact Combs’ security chief to inform him about the incident.
It was claimed that the mogul had threatened to reveal embarrassing video recordings of a sexual nature, intending to share them with the child’s father, in December 2023 according to Jane.
In the decline of Jane and Combs’ relationship, she claimed he stated that he had “no more to gain” or “nothing left to protect” by sharing the videos. She later stated, “There were continuous intense phone calls.
Jane shared with Khorram her account of the incident that was later admitted as proof. In her messages, she mentioned that Combs had warned he would share the video where she stated she was under heavy influence of drugs.
In addition, she mentioned that she required some distance from Combs as she was attempting to heal from all the pain he inflicted on her.
Jane told the court that Khorram assured her that Combs would not use the footage.
During her testimony, Jane stated that certain aspects of Ventura’s lawsuit from November 2023, which was later resolved, appeared to be similar to her own encounters with Combs.
She shared with the jury that she came very close to losing consciousness, and it’s possible she actually did faint. She also stated that there were three particularly distressing passages in the documents that resonated deeply with her personal ordeal.
Jane, participating in the “hotel nights,” found herself immersed in a narrative that mirrored her personal experiences. This led her to exchange text messages with Combs, ultimately resulting in a confrontation.
In a response to Ventura’s lawsuit, she expressed her distress by stating, “It seems like I’m reliving my own sexual trauma,” as seen in the presented screenshots. She added, “I’m feeling unwell. It’s an exact replica of my drug-filled days and nights. You were aware this would happen. You manipulated me, you made me lose my sanity.
The messages persisted, making me feel deeply uncomfortable with the demand for continuous engagement. You seemed to exacerbate my distress related to past sexual traumas. I feel profoundly violated and this feels like a form of abuse.”
This version maintains the original’s meaning while using more natural and less confrontational language, making it easier for readers to understand and empathize with the sentiment expressed.
Later on, Combs referred to Jane during their conversation without her awareness, which was later presented as evidence. In this conversation, he mentioned that “we did these actions jointly” and expressed the need for her to be present at a particular time, saying “this is when” he required her.
Jane, unaware she was being filmed, expressed feeling nauseous to Combs upon reviewing Ventura’s documents.
Jane shared that during her experiences at “Hotel Nights” with Combs and male companions, she usually used ecstasy. However, on one particular occasion, she chose to abstain from drugs while engaging in intimate encounters with three different men.
She stated that on this particular evening, she was in the company of several gentlemen. Later on, she felt unwell and vomited. At this point, Sean entered the scene and reassured her, saying, “Don’t worry, you’ll feel better now. Let’s step outside instead.
Jane said that at the end of the night, she felt “absolutely terrible.”
On the 18th day of the trial, Combs’ defense team submitted a request for a retrial on June 7th, claiming that Ventura and Bongolan had falsely testified about Bongolan being hung over the 17th-floor balcony by the rap magnate.
In their argument, lawyers representing Combs (who had a request for a mistrial previously declined by Judge Subramanian) alleged that the prosecution acted improperly by presenting false or misleading testimony.
In the current trial, the government has provided evidence that either they knew or ought to have known was significantly misleading regarding their claim that Mr. Combs hung Bryana Bongolan over the balcony of Cassie Ventura’s apartment in September 2016. To prevent an unfair verdict in this case, it is recommended that the Court declare a mistrial.
In another version, the defense alleges that Bongolan fabricated details regarding the event, citing perceived discrepancies in her account. The prosecution plans to present their rebuttal on June 9, and the judge is expected to deliver his decision the following day.
Jane stated that starting from April 2023, which marked their second year together, Sean Combs started covering the costs of her home’s rent. She disclosed that they had agreed earlier, approximately a month before, that he would offer her a regular financial support in the form of an allowance.
On this ‘night at the hotel,’ I distinctly recall that it was then when Sean presented us with a ‘lovers’ agreement,’ as he asked me about my desired allowance,” she explained to the jury.
month, just moving forward, that’s what he was going to do for me.”
Initially, I mentioned a budget of 15,000, but he suggested 10,000,” she explained about the allowance. “I began searching for new accommodations and eventually moved into a larger, more spacious home with that budget. I desired a place where my child and I could comfortably reside, a sanctuary of sorts. A place to call home, aiming for a sense of equilibrium in our relationship. Previously, I had been pouring out all my affection towards him, and this was his way of reciprocating.
As a faithful adherent to our accord, I was led to believe that I’d be entitled to funds “without any undue urging, for a span of two years.
As an ardent admirer, I can’t help but share my awe for Jane’s passionate love life. However, it’s no secret that her passion has come at a cost. Week after week, she’s battled urinary tract infections and yeast infections, often requiring regular antibiotics to combat them. The relentless nature of these issues is a testament to the intensity of her sexual encounters.
Moreover, she confessed that sometimes she engaged in intercourse before fully recuperating from these UTIs, which only compounded her struggles. And let’s not forget about those hotel nights – almost every single one was marred by pelvic soreness that she endured with unwavering resolve, a constant companion throughout her amorous escapades.
The witness additionally disclosed that she experienced discomfort in her shoulders and back during the act. She further mentioned, “I found myself on the very edge of the chair or bed, assuming the positions he preferred for foreplay with these men.
Even though she endured the pain, Jane stated that she chose not to inform Combs about it as she preferred to avoid suggesting anything negative.
However, she asserted that the discomfort extended beyond their shared bedroom. In court, she explained to the jurors that she had agreed to get her nipples pierced at Combs’ request, as he claimed it would intensify his attraction and was something he desired from his partner.
She said she removed the piercings because they “snagged and bled and got infected.”
However, she testified that Combs was unhappy with her decision.
She claimed that, initially, he appeared to accept the situation. However, as time passed and I continued to take longer than expected, his patience seemed to wear thin.
I can’t help but share this quote, ‘He’d often remark, ‘When next I lay mine eyes on thee, pray let there be piercings adorning your visage.’ This was his unique way of expressing his affection.
Read More
- Don’t Miss the BBC Proms 2025: Full Schedule Revealed!
- EUR JPY PREDICTION
- All New Items in Abiotic Factor 1.0
- Nobody 2 Streaming Release Date Rumors: When’s It Coming Out on Peacock?
- One Piece’s Anime Unveils First Look at the Final Saga’s Best Scene
- Ozzy Osbourne and the Memecoin Madness: When Death Becomes a Crypto Trend
- USD JPY PREDICTION
- Gold Rate Forecast
- GBP USD PREDICTION
- ONDO PREDICTION. ONDO cryptocurrency
2025-08-02 23:19