Will Bitcoin Miners Be Forced to Follow the Price Down the Rabbit Hole?

by

The recent sell-off of Bitcoin appears to be no trifling matter; rather, it resembles a deeper affliction than the mere caprices of a technical correction. Indeed, we find ourselves on the precipice of a level that significantly impacts the economics of mining, thus altering the risk profile of this ever-tumultuous market.

As we approach the esteemed figure of $70,000, Bitcoin abruptly transitions from a market driven solely by traders’ whims to one wherein the behaviors of miners and network economics come into play. It is for this reason that such a price point assumes greater importance than any trendline or moving average currently at hand.

Bitcoin Enters the Stressful Realm of Mining

With the current network difficulty and electricity costs hovering around $0.08 per kWh, the latest mining data portrays a rather alarming pressure band.

A substantial number of Antminer S21-series machines, which represent a considerable portion of the global hashrate, find their shutdown prices clustered in the vicinity of $69,000 to $74,000 per BTC.

In plain terms, should the price languish below this range, many miners will cease to find their operations profitable.

Bitcoin possesses a propensity to fluctuate thousands of dollars in either direction; however, what distinguishes this particular moment is who finds themselves under duress, rather than the rapidity of the price’s movements.

Above the fabled $70,000 mark, mining remains a lucrative venture. Yet, below it, profitability becomes a selective affair, allowing only the most efficient miners to flourish, whilst those of middling efficiency face the specter of losses.

This predicament not only exerts pressure upon price but also upon cash flow, balance sheets, and behavior.

A Shutdown Price Does Not Constitute a Price Floor

It is crucial that we maintain precision in our discourse.

A shutdown price is not to be misconstrued as a guaranteed support level. The miners are not the arbiters of Bitcoin’s price; indeed, markets may trade beneath the breakeven point for mining operations for protracted periods.

Nevertheless, shutdown prices delineate zones where behavior undergoes transformation, and it is behavior that propels market movements during times of stress.

The Consequences Should Bitcoin Descend Below $70,000

Should Bitcoin experience a fleeting dip below $70,000 before swiftly recovering, one might find the impact relatively benign. However, if the price chooses to linger beneath this threshold, a series of second-order effects begin to accumulate.

Firstly, the less robust miners may find themselves compelled to liquidate their BTC reserves to meet electricity and hosting obligations. Some may even resort to shutting down their machines, thereby diminishing the overall hashrate.

Most crucially, negative sentiment tends to perpetuate itself as headlines transition from “volatility” to “mining stress.”

Individually, none of these factors spell disaster; however, together they possess the potential to amplify the downward spiral.

Mining stress becomes particularly perilous when it coincides with liquidity challenges.

At present, Bitcoin finds itself grappling with:

  • Tight global liquidity
  • A diminished appetite for risk
  • ETF outflows and derivatives liquidations

If mining stress adds an element of forced selling atop these existing pressures, the market may plummet far more swiftly than fundamentals alone would suggest.

This is how sharp, disorderly moves may transpire – not due to any inherent flaw within Bitcoin, but rather because multiple pressures conspire in concert.

Read More

2026-02-02 22:16